Reconstruction of the external ear using implant-supported alloplasts—Our experience

Rayan Malick, M.E. Sham, Thyagraj Jayaram Reddy, P.C. Jacob
{"title":"Reconstruction of the external ear using implant-supported alloplasts—Our experience","authors":"Rayan Malick, M.E. Sham, Thyagraj Jayaram Reddy, P.C. Jacob","doi":"10.4103/njms.njms_160_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Surgical reconstruction of the missing external ear is difficult, and the results are often far from satisfactory. An implant-retained auricular prosthesis is a suitable alternative. Microtia, malformation, deformity, and partial or complete loss of the external ear may be due to various congenital or acquired factors. A case series of three patients treated with implant-retained auricular prostheses is presented in this article. For each missing pinna, two titanium implants were placed in the temporal bone. After 6 months of osseointegration, the implants were loaded. All three cases were rehabilitated with a bar and clip retained prosthesis. There were two male and one female patient with an average age of 16.6 years. One patient had unilateral absence of external ear and two had bilateral absence. A total of 10 implants were placed, 4 on the right side and 6 on the left. The average post rehabilitation follow-up was 18 months. Peri-implant tissue reactions were observed at two sites. The implant-retained auricular prosthesis is an alternative treatment approach with good retention and patient satisfaction. Long-term follow-up is required to assess delayed sequelae.","PeriodicalId":18827,"journal":{"name":"National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/njms.njms_160_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Surgical reconstruction of the missing external ear is difficult, and the results are often far from satisfactory. An implant-retained auricular prosthesis is a suitable alternative. Microtia, malformation, deformity, and partial or complete loss of the external ear may be due to various congenital or acquired factors. A case series of three patients treated with implant-retained auricular prostheses is presented in this article. For each missing pinna, two titanium implants were placed in the temporal bone. After 6 months of osseointegration, the implants were loaded. All three cases were rehabilitated with a bar and clip retained prosthesis. There were two male and one female patient with an average age of 16.6 years. One patient had unilateral absence of external ear and two had bilateral absence. A total of 10 implants were placed, 4 on the right side and 6 on the left. The average post rehabilitation follow-up was 18 months. Peri-implant tissue reactions were observed at two sites. The implant-retained auricular prosthesis is an alternative treatment approach with good retention and patient satisfaction. Long-term follow-up is required to assess delayed sequelae.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用种植体支持的同种异体重建外耳-我们的经验
手术重建缺失的外耳是困难的,结果往往远不能令人满意。植体保留式耳廓假体是一种合适的选择。外耳小、畸形、畸形、部分或完全丧失可能是由于各种先天性或后天因素造成的。本文介绍了三例采用人工耳假体治疗的患者。对于每个缺失的耳廓,在颞骨内放置两个钛植入物。骨整合6个月后,植入物被加载。所有病例均采用棒夹式假体修复。男2例,女1例,平均年龄16.6岁。单侧外耳缺失1例,双侧外耳缺失2例。共放置10个种植体,4个在右侧,6个在左侧。康复后平均随访18个月。在两个部位观察种植体周围组织反应。植体保留型耳假体是一种具有良好固位性和患者满意度的替代治疗方法。需要长期随访以评估迟发性后遗症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Soft skills for personal development of the surgeon for improved outcomes for patient and surgeon. Oral rhabdomyosarcoma of mandibular region: A case report. Evaluation of efficacy of simvastatin in bone regeneration following local application in third molar extraction socket: A randomized control trial. Comparative evaluation of implant stability and crestal bone level between tapered and cylindrical implants in the posterior regions of the mandible: A prospective, randomized, split-mouth clinical trial. Comparative and clinical evaluation between piezoelectric and conventional rotary techniques for mandibular impacted third molar extraction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1