External auditory canal injuries in maxillofacial trauma – Proposal of a symptom-based treatment algorithm with a report of twelve cases

Elavenil Panneerselvam, Ramkumar Ceyar Kuppuswamy Alagesan, Vaishnavi Sripathi, Geetha Sridharan, Sasikala Balasubramanian, Krishnakumar Raja Vegasana Balakrishna
{"title":"External auditory canal injuries in maxillofacial trauma – Proposal of a symptom-based treatment algorithm with a report of twelve cases","authors":"Elavenil Panneerselvam, Ramkumar Ceyar Kuppuswamy Alagesan, Vaishnavi Sripathi, Geetha Sridharan, Sasikala Balasubramanian, Krishnakumar Raja Vegasana Balakrishna","doi":"10.4103/njms.njms_188_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Injury to the external auditory canal (EAC) may occur following facial trauma. They manifest as otalgia, ear bleeding, otorrhea, facial palsy, or altered hearing. But literature regarding its management is sparse. The study aimed to identify the incidence and types of EAC injury in facial trauma, grade their severity, and propose a symptom-based treatment algorithm. Patients and Methods: This was a prospective case series involving patients with signs/symptoms of EAC injury following maxillofacial trauma. The EAC was evaluated by clinical examination, imaging, endoscopy, and audiometry. Clinical findings were graded into mild, moderate, and severe. Treatment was matched to clinical findings according to the proposed algorithm. The outcomes of the study were incidence and types of EAC injury in facial trauma and resolution of presenting signs/symptoms. Data were analyzed for descriptive statistics using SPSS software (v26; IBM, Armonk, NY). Results: A total of 88 patients reported with maxillofacial trauma during a 6-month period. Signs/symptoms of EAC injury were observed in 41 patients, of which 12 (11 males and 1 female) were confirmed with a diagnosis of EAC injuries. Eight patients demonstrated only cartilaginous injuries while three had bony injuries. Treatment was successful in 11 out of 12 patients, with a best point estimate of 0.86 (Z score-1.959, 95% CI). Conclusion: Clinical findings of EAC injury mandate thorough investigation to ascertain the site and severity of the injury. Symptom-based treatment of EAC injuries produces an effective resolution of signs/symptoms and improved treatment outcomes.","PeriodicalId":18827,"journal":{"name":"National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/njms.njms_188_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Injury to the external auditory canal (EAC) may occur following facial trauma. They manifest as otalgia, ear bleeding, otorrhea, facial palsy, or altered hearing. But literature regarding its management is sparse. The study aimed to identify the incidence and types of EAC injury in facial trauma, grade their severity, and propose a symptom-based treatment algorithm. Patients and Methods: This was a prospective case series involving patients with signs/symptoms of EAC injury following maxillofacial trauma. The EAC was evaluated by clinical examination, imaging, endoscopy, and audiometry. Clinical findings were graded into mild, moderate, and severe. Treatment was matched to clinical findings according to the proposed algorithm. The outcomes of the study were incidence and types of EAC injury in facial trauma and resolution of presenting signs/symptoms. Data were analyzed for descriptive statistics using SPSS software (v26; IBM, Armonk, NY). Results: A total of 88 patients reported with maxillofacial trauma during a 6-month period. Signs/symptoms of EAC injury were observed in 41 patients, of which 12 (11 males and 1 female) were confirmed with a diagnosis of EAC injuries. Eight patients demonstrated only cartilaginous injuries while three had bony injuries. Treatment was successful in 11 out of 12 patients, with a best point estimate of 0.86 (Z score-1.959, 95% CI). Conclusion: Clinical findings of EAC injury mandate thorough investigation to ascertain the site and severity of the injury. Symptom-based treatment of EAC injuries produces an effective resolution of signs/symptoms and improved treatment outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颌面部外伤外耳道损伤——基于症状的治疗方法的提出(附12例报告)
目的:外耳道损伤可发生在面部外伤后。表现为耳痛、耳出血、耳漏、面瘫或听力改变。但有关其管理的文献很少。本研究旨在确定面部外伤中EAC损伤的发生率和类型,对其严重程度进行分级,并提出基于症状的治疗算法。患者和方法:这是一个前瞻性病例系列,涉及颌面部外伤后EAC损伤的体征/症状患者。通过临床检查、影像学检查、内窥镜检查和听力学检查评估EAC。临床表现分为轻度、中度和重度。根据提出的算法将治疗与临床结果相匹配。该研究的结果是面部外伤中EAC损伤的发生率和类型以及表现的体征/症状的缓解。数据采用SPSS软件(v26;IBM,阿蒙克,纽约州)。结果:在6个月的时间里,共有88例患者报告了颌面部创伤。41例患者观察到EAC损伤的体征/症状,其中12例(11男1女)确诊为EAC损伤。8例仅有软骨损伤,3例有骨损伤。12例患者中有11例治疗成功,最佳点估计为0.86 (Z评分-1.959,95% CI)。结论:EAC损伤的临床表现需要深入调查,以确定损伤的部位和严重程度。以症状为基础的EAC损伤治疗可有效缓解体征/症状并改善治疗结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Soft skills for personal development of the surgeon for improved outcomes for patient and surgeon. Oral rhabdomyosarcoma of mandibular region: A case report. Evaluation of efficacy of simvastatin in bone regeneration following local application in third molar extraction socket: A randomized control trial. Comparative evaluation of implant stability and crestal bone level between tapered and cylindrical implants in the posterior regions of the mandible: A prospective, randomized, split-mouth clinical trial. Comparative and clinical evaluation between piezoelectric and conventional rotary techniques for mandibular impacted third molar extraction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1