Comparative evaluation of regenerative potential of injectable platelet-rich fibrin and platelet-rich fibrin with demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft in the treatment of intrabony defects: A randomized controlled clinical study
Saba Salem, Shivani Dhawan, Ena Sharma, Rajan Dhawan, Abhilasha Mukherjee, S M Sivaraman
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of regenerative potential of injectable platelet-rich fibrin and platelet-rich fibrin with demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft in the treatment of intrabony defects: A randomized controlled clinical study","authors":"Saba Salem, Shivani Dhawan, Ena Sharma, Rajan Dhawan, Abhilasha Mukherjee, S M Sivaraman","doi":"10.4103/njms.njms_39_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) being in liquid form keeps graft particles clumped together forming agglutinated steak of bone graft. It has been shown to contain more platelets and long-term deliverance of growth factors in comparison with platelet-rich fibrin (PRF). Aim: The aim of the present study was to assess regenerative potential of i-PRF and comparing it with PRF, along with demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) in the treatment of intrabony alveolar defects. Materials and Method: Thirty defect sites in 15 patients with bilateral intrabony defects were assigned randomly into two groups (Group I (Control group)- DFDBA + PRF and Group II (Test group)-DFDBA + i-PRF). Gingival index (GI), plaque index (PI), pocket probing depth (PPD), and relative attachment level (RAL) were recorded at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Linear bone growth (LBG) was recorded radiographically at baseline and 6 months. Statistical Analysis: ANOVA test and post hoc Tukey test were used to assess intragroup comparison of clinical parameters. Paired t-test was used to assess intragroup comparison of the radiographic parameter. Unpaired t-test was used to assess intergroup variations in all the clinical as well as radiographic parameters. Results: Statistically significant PPD reduction ( P = 0.005) and RAL gain ( P = 0.003) were found in Group II than in Group I, and no significant difference was found in other parameters. Percentage LBG was higher in Group II than Group I but the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion: i-PRF with DFDBA showed more favorable results as compared to PRF with DFDBA in the management of intrabony periodontal defects.","PeriodicalId":18827,"journal":{"name":"National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/njms.njms_39_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) being in liquid form keeps graft particles clumped together forming agglutinated steak of bone graft. It has been shown to contain more platelets and long-term deliverance of growth factors in comparison with platelet-rich fibrin (PRF). Aim: The aim of the present study was to assess regenerative potential of i-PRF and comparing it with PRF, along with demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) in the treatment of intrabony alveolar defects. Materials and Method: Thirty defect sites in 15 patients with bilateral intrabony defects were assigned randomly into two groups (Group I (Control group)- DFDBA + PRF and Group II (Test group)-DFDBA + i-PRF). Gingival index (GI), plaque index (PI), pocket probing depth (PPD), and relative attachment level (RAL) were recorded at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Linear bone growth (LBG) was recorded radiographically at baseline and 6 months. Statistical Analysis: ANOVA test and post hoc Tukey test were used to assess intragroup comparison of clinical parameters. Paired t-test was used to assess intragroup comparison of the radiographic parameter. Unpaired t-test was used to assess intergroup variations in all the clinical as well as radiographic parameters. Results: Statistically significant PPD reduction ( P = 0.005) and RAL gain ( P = 0.003) were found in Group II than in Group I, and no significant difference was found in other parameters. Percentage LBG was higher in Group II than Group I but the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion: i-PRF with DFDBA showed more favorable results as compared to PRF with DFDBA in the management of intrabony periodontal defects.