Understanding Business Intelligence Implementation Failure From Technology, Organization, and Process Perspectives

Q1 Business, Management and Accounting IEEE Engineering Management Review Pub Date : 2023-11-10 DOI:10.1109/EMR.2023.3331247
Randy A. Williams;Gazi Murat Duman;Elif Kongar;Dan Tenney
{"title":"Understanding Business Intelligence Implementation Failure From Technology, Organization, and Process Perspectives","authors":"Randy A. Williams;Gazi Murat Duman;Elif Kongar;Dan Tenney","doi":"10.1109/EMR.2023.3331247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Business intelligence (BI) systems are a suite of technologies enabling rapid decision making in modern business environments of rapidly changing market dynamics and exploding data volumes. BI implementation is intended to enable enterprises to become data driven, delivering actionable insights based on the factual synthesis of up-to-the-minute information. Contrary to its vastly increasing importance and investment, research suggests a majority of BI implementations fail to achieve successful results . Relevant studies fall short of explaining failures across various deployment sizes and their overall impact. In an effort to address the gap, this article attempts to assess the drivers of failed BI implementation across scenarios using the expert opinion of practitioners. Using the technology, organization, and process framework, the analysis provides a ranking of failure drivers under three deployment scenarios: enterprise wide, departmental or business unit level, and small team or individual-sized deployments. Practitioners cannot assume that a one-size-fits-all model for explaining BI implementation failure is appropriate. To create a more holistic evaluation framework, the analytical hierarchy process is adopted to provide the evaluation of significance for each perspective and criterion under alternate scenarios. The findings will enable decision makers to make more informed investment decisions, providing significant savings while contributing to literature via a customizable data-driven model.","PeriodicalId":35585,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Engineering Management Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Engineering Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10314742/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Business intelligence (BI) systems are a suite of technologies enabling rapid decision making in modern business environments of rapidly changing market dynamics and exploding data volumes. BI implementation is intended to enable enterprises to become data driven, delivering actionable insights based on the factual synthesis of up-to-the-minute information. Contrary to its vastly increasing importance and investment, research suggests a majority of BI implementations fail to achieve successful results . Relevant studies fall short of explaining failures across various deployment sizes and their overall impact. In an effort to address the gap, this article attempts to assess the drivers of failed BI implementation across scenarios using the expert opinion of practitioners. Using the technology, organization, and process framework, the analysis provides a ranking of failure drivers under three deployment scenarios: enterprise wide, departmental or business unit level, and small team or individual-sized deployments. Practitioners cannot assume that a one-size-fits-all model for explaining BI implementation failure is appropriate. To create a more holistic evaluation framework, the analytical hierarchy process is adopted to provide the evaluation of significance for each perspective and criterion under alternate scenarios. The findings will enable decision makers to make more informed investment decisions, providing significant savings while contributing to literature via a customizable data-driven model.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从技术、组织和流程角度了解商业智能实施失败的原因
商业智能(BI)系统是一整套技术,能够在市场动态瞬息万变、数据量爆炸式增长的现代商业环境中实现快速决策。实施商业智能的目的是使企业成为数据驱动型企业,根据最新信息的事实综合提供可行的见解。尽管商业智能的重要性和投资日益增加,但研究表明,大多数商业智能实施都未能取得成功。相关研究未能解释各种部署规模的失败及其总体影响。为了弥补这一不足,本文试图利用从业人员的专家意见,评估各种情况下 BI 实施失败的驱动因素。利用技术、组织和流程框架,分析提供了三种部署情景下失败驱动因素的排名:企业范围、部门或业务单位级别以及小型团队或个人规模的部署。实践者不能假定 "一刀切 "的模式适用于解释 BI 实施失败。为了创建一个更全面的评估框架,我们采用了层次分析法,在不同情况下对每个角度和标准的重要性进行评估。研究结果将使决策者能够做出更明智的投资决策,节省大量资金,同时通过可定制的数据驱动模型为文献做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Engineering Management Review
IEEE Engineering Management Review Business, Management and Accounting-Management of Technology and Innovation
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: Reprints articles from other publications of significant interest to members. The papers are aimed at those engaged in managing research, development, or engineering activities. Reprints make it possible for the readers to receive the best of today"s literature without having to subscribe to and read other periodicals.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Front Cover Introducing IEEE Collabratec A Multimetric Approach for Evaluation of ChatGPT-Generated Text Summaries Call for Papers: Special Issue on Supply Chain Digitalization in the Age of (R)Evolution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1