Ley orgánica de regulación de la eutanasia: conocimiento e implicación de los médicos en España tras un año de su aplicación

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Revista clinica espanola Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rce.2023.09.003
G. Pujol-Fontrodona , J.M. Domínguez-Roldan , R. Valero
{"title":"Ley orgánica de regulación de la eutanasia: conocimiento e implicación de los médicos en España tras un año de su aplicación","authors":"G. Pujol-Fontrodona ,&nbsp;J.M. Domínguez-Roldan ,&nbsp;R. Valero","doi":"10.1016/j.rce.2023.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and aims</h3><p>The Organic Law Regulating Euthanasia (LORE, for its initials in Spanish) came into force in June 2021. This study aims to examine knowledge of the LORE among physicians licensed in Spain as well as their involvement with and the impact of the law.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This work is a descriptive, cross-sectional study conducted by means of a survey. Information was gathered through a self-administered questionnaire.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The survey was answered by 1446 physicians licensed in Spain. The sample's demographic characteristics were as follows: 54.7% were women, the mean age was 52<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->14 years, and 66.0% worked in a hospital. Catalonia was the autonomous community with the most participants (44.6%). Regarding specialties, anesthesiology and resuscitation had the highest number of participants (21.9%), followed by family and community medicine (18.5%). The LORE was known in detail by 24.3% of physicians, 58.0% had a positive opinion of it, and 31.1% had direct experience with the euthanasia procedure. Practitioners working in the hospital setting perceived the law more favorably compared to those in the primary care setting (62.3% vs. 47.3%, <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.01).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Most doctors did not have in-depth knowledge of the LORE, although a majority supported its existence, particularly those in hospital medicine. Most physicians who viewed the LORE negatively were male, older, and worked in primary care. A minority of physicians considered registering as conscientious objectors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21223,"journal":{"name":"Revista clinica espanola","volume":"223 10","pages":"Pages 596-603"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista clinica espanola","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014256523001674","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims

The Organic Law Regulating Euthanasia (LORE, for its initials in Spanish) came into force in June 2021. This study aims to examine knowledge of the LORE among physicians licensed in Spain as well as their involvement with and the impact of the law.

Methods

This work is a descriptive, cross-sectional study conducted by means of a survey. Information was gathered through a self-administered questionnaire.

Results

The survey was answered by 1446 physicians licensed in Spain. The sample's demographic characteristics were as follows: 54.7% were women, the mean age was 52 ± 14 years, and 66.0% worked in a hospital. Catalonia was the autonomous community with the most participants (44.6%). Regarding specialties, anesthesiology and resuscitation had the highest number of participants (21.9%), followed by family and community medicine (18.5%). The LORE was known in detail by 24.3% of physicians, 58.0% had a positive opinion of it, and 31.1% had direct experience with the euthanasia procedure. Practitioners working in the hospital setting perceived the law more favorably compared to those in the primary care setting (62.3% vs. 47.3%, p < 0.01).

Conclusions

Most doctors did not have in-depth knowledge of the LORE, although a majority supported its existence, particularly those in hospital medicine. Most physicians who viewed the LORE negatively were male, older, and worked in primary care. A minority of physicians considered registering as conscientious objectors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
安乐死组织法:西班牙医生在实施一年后的知识和参与
背景和目标规范安乐死的《组织法》(LORE,西班牙语首字母缩写)于2021年6月生效。本研究的目的是检查在西班牙执业医师的知识,以及他们的参与和法律的影响。方法本研究是一项描述性的、横断面的调查研究。信息是通过一份自我填写的问卷收集的。结果1446名西班牙执业医师参与了调查。样本的人口学特征为:女性54.7%,平均年龄52±14岁,66.0%在医院工作。加泰罗尼亚是参与人数最多的自治区(44.6%)。在专业方面,参与人数最多的是麻醉和复苏(21.9%),其次是家庭和社区医学(18.5%)。24.3%的医生了解安乐死的细节,58.0%的医生对此有积极的看法,31.1%的医生有安乐死的直接经验。与初级保健机构的从业人员相比,在医院工作的从业人员对法律的看法更有利(62.3%对47.3%,p <0.01)。结论大多数医生对LORE的了解并不深入,尽管大多数医生支持它的存在,特别是医院医学的医生。大多数对LORE持负面看法的医生是男性,年龄较大,从事初级保健工作。少数医生考虑注册为出于良心拒服兵役者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista clinica espanola
Revista clinica espanola 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
73
审稿时长
28 days
期刊介绍: Revista Clínica Española published its first issue in 1940 and is the body of expression of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (SEMI). The journal fully endorses the goals of updating knowledge and facilitating the acquisition of key developments in internal medicine applied to clinical practice. Revista Clínica Española is subject to a thorough double blind review of the received articles written in Spanish or English. Nine issues are published each year, including mostly originals, reviews and consensus documents.
期刊最新文献
Transmisión de un brote de sarampión en la sala de espera de urgencias: el papel de la vacunación Sarampión en la sala de urgencias: el enemigo sigue ahí Seguimiento y tratamiento de la enfermedad tromboembólica venosa a largo plazo: recomendaciones del Grupo de Enfermedad Tromboembólica de la Sociedad Española de Medicina Interna 2024 Abordaje terapéutico de las crisis agudas de porfirias hepáticas Resumen ejecutivo del documento de consenso sobre la realización de la ecografía clínica: recomendaciones desde los Grupos de Trabajo de Ecografía Clínica de la SEMI, SEDAR, SEGG, SEMERGEN, SEMES, SEMFYC y SEMG
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1