Does LinkedIn cause imposter syndrome? An empirical examination of well‐being and consumption‐related effects

IF 8.9 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Psychology & Marketing Pub Date : 2023-10-20 DOI:10.1002/mar.21926
Ben Marder, Ana Javornik, Kang Qi, Sebastian Oliver, Laura Lavertu, Kirsten Cowan
{"title":"Does LinkedIn cause imposter syndrome? An empirical examination of well‐being and consumption‐related effects","authors":"Ben Marder, Ana Javornik, Kang Qi, Sebastian Oliver, Laura Lavertu, Kirsten Cowan","doi":"10.1002/mar.21926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We attend to the unexamined intersection between professional social network site (SNS) usage and imposter syndrome. Specifically, we provide the first examination of: do such sites cause imposter thoughts (“others think I am more competent than I think I am”); if so, why and when this happens, and what effect this has on well‐being and consumption‐related results. Supported by objective self‐focused attention theory and two online experiments, we show that professional SNS usage heightens professional self‐focused attention, triggering imposter thoughts. This results in negative emotions and consumption‐related effects. We further examine two boundary conditions, showing that effects are reduced for individuals high in narcissism or work centrality. From these findings, we extend the sociocognitive theorization of the imposter phenomenon by uncovering, first, context‐specific self‐focused attention as the reason “why” people feel imposter‐ish in particular circumstances and second, consumption‐related consequences. We further contribute imposter thoughts as a new alternative explanation for negative emotions experienced whilst using professional SNSs.","PeriodicalId":48373,"journal":{"name":"Psychology & Marketing","volume":"8 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology & Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21926","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract We attend to the unexamined intersection between professional social network site (SNS) usage and imposter syndrome. Specifically, we provide the first examination of: do such sites cause imposter thoughts (“others think I am more competent than I think I am”); if so, why and when this happens, and what effect this has on well‐being and consumption‐related results. Supported by objective self‐focused attention theory and two online experiments, we show that professional SNS usage heightens professional self‐focused attention, triggering imposter thoughts. This results in negative emotions and consumption‐related effects. We further examine two boundary conditions, showing that effects are reduced for individuals high in narcissism or work centrality. From these findings, we extend the sociocognitive theorization of the imposter phenomenon by uncovering, first, context‐specific self‐focused attention as the reason “why” people feel imposter‐ish in particular circumstances and second, consumption‐related consequences. We further contribute imposter thoughts as a new alternative explanation for negative emotions experienced whilst using professional SNSs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
领英会导致冒名顶替综合症吗?幸福和消费相关影响的实证检验
摘要:我们关注专业社交网站(SNS)使用与冒名顶替综合症之间未经研究的交集。具体来说,我们提供了第一次检查:这些网站是否会引起冒名顶替的想法(“别人认为我比我认为的更有能力”);如果是这样,为什么和何时会发生这种情况,以及这对健康和消费相关结果有什么影响。通过客观自我集中注意理论和两个在线实验,我们发现职业社交网络的使用提高了职业自我集中注意,引发了冒名者思想。这导致了负面情绪和消费相关的影响。我们进一步研究了两个边界条件,表明对高度自恋或工作中心性的个体的影响降低。根据这些发现,我们扩展了冒名顶替现象的社会认知理论,首先,情境特定的自我关注是人们在特定情况下感到冒名顶替的原因,其次,消费相关的后果。我们进一步提出冒名顶替思想作为使用专业社交媒体时所经历的负面情绪的一种新的替代解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
20.90%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Psychology & Marketing (P&M) publishes original research and review articles dealing with the application of psychological theories and techniques to marketing. As an interdisciplinary journal, P&M serves practitioners and academicians in the fields of psychology and marketing and is an appropriate outlet for articles designed to be of interest, concern, and applied value to its audience of scholars and professionals. Manuscripts that use psychological theory to better understand the various aspects of the marketing of products and services are appropriate for submission.
期刊最新文献
The bittersweet of consumer–human brand relationships in the social media context Eliminating customer experience pain points in complex customer journeys through smart service solutions The purity premium effect: The asymmetrical value change around pure products When “good enough” is not good enough: How maximizing benefits financial well‐being Beyond humans: Consumer reluctance to adopt zoonotic artificial intelligence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1