Association Between Disease-Modifying Therapy and Information Processing Speed in Multiple Sclerosis

Albert Aboseif, Moein Amin, James Bena, Kunio Nakamura, Gabrielle Macaron, Daniel Ontaneda
{"title":"Association Between Disease-Modifying Therapy and Information Processing Speed in Multiple Sclerosis","authors":"Albert Aboseif, Moein Amin, James Bena, Kunio Nakamura, Gabrielle Macaron, Daniel Ontaneda","doi":"10.7224/1537-2073.2023-010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Background: Cognitive impairment (CI) is common in multiple sclerosis (MS). Processing speed (PS) is often affected, making it an ideal target for monitoring CI. This study aims to evaluate the association between disease-modifying therapy (DMT) use and intensity and longitudinal changes in Processing Speed Test (PST) scores for individuals with MS. Methods: A retrospective analysis of individual PST scores at a single MS center was conducted. Individuals with 2 or more PST assessments were included. Scores on the PST were compared longitudinally between those who had been on a DMT for 2 or more years and those who had been off a DMT for 2 or more years and between those on high-efficacy DMTs and those on low-/moderate-efficacy DMTs. A linear regression model was approximated to evaluate the rate of cognitive change over time. A propensity score adjustment was conducted using a multivariable logistic regression. Results: The cohort was 642 individuals, 539 on DMT and 103 off DMT. Median age and disease duration was 49.7 (interquartile range [IQR] 42.4-57.9) and 16.6 years (IQR 9.3-23.0) in the DMT group, and 58.9 (IQR 52.2-65.3) and 20.0 years (IQR 14.1-31.4) in the non-DMT group. Both cohorts were predominantly female (75% DMT, 79.6% non-DMT), with a mean of 4 assessments (IQR 3-5), and an average monitoring duration of 1.9 years (1.2-2.4) in the DMT group, and 1.8 years (1.4-2.4) in the non-DMT group. After adjusting for multiple factors, DMT status and intensity were not found to be significant predictors of longitudinal PST change. Conclusions: Neither DMT status nor intensity were significant predictors of cognitive processing speed over a period of approximately 2 years. Future prospective multicenter trials are needed to further support these findings.","PeriodicalId":14150,"journal":{"name":"International journal of MS care","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of MS care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7224/1537-2073.2023-010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Cognitive impairment (CI) is common in multiple sclerosis (MS). Processing speed (PS) is often affected, making it an ideal target for monitoring CI. This study aims to evaluate the association between disease-modifying therapy (DMT) use and intensity and longitudinal changes in Processing Speed Test (PST) scores for individuals with MS. Methods: A retrospective analysis of individual PST scores at a single MS center was conducted. Individuals with 2 or more PST assessments were included. Scores on the PST were compared longitudinally between those who had been on a DMT for 2 or more years and those who had been off a DMT for 2 or more years and between those on high-efficacy DMTs and those on low-/moderate-efficacy DMTs. A linear regression model was approximated to evaluate the rate of cognitive change over time. A propensity score adjustment was conducted using a multivariable logistic regression. Results: The cohort was 642 individuals, 539 on DMT and 103 off DMT. Median age and disease duration was 49.7 (interquartile range [IQR] 42.4-57.9) and 16.6 years (IQR 9.3-23.0) in the DMT group, and 58.9 (IQR 52.2-65.3) and 20.0 years (IQR 14.1-31.4) in the non-DMT group. Both cohorts were predominantly female (75% DMT, 79.6% non-DMT), with a mean of 4 assessments (IQR 3-5), and an average monitoring duration of 1.9 years (1.2-2.4) in the DMT group, and 1.8 years (1.4-2.4) in the non-DMT group. After adjusting for multiple factors, DMT status and intensity were not found to be significant predictors of longitudinal PST change. Conclusions: Neither DMT status nor intensity were significant predictors of cognitive processing speed over a period of approximately 2 years. Future prospective multicenter trials are needed to further support these findings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多发性硬化症疾病改善治疗与信息处理速度的关系
摘要:背景:认知障碍(CI)在多发性硬化症(MS)中很常见。处理速度(PS)经常受到影响,使其成为监视CI的理想目标。本研究旨在评估疾病改善治疗(DMT)的使用与MS个体处理速度测试(PST)得分的强度和纵向变化之间的关系。方法:对单个MS中心的个体PST得分进行回顾性分析。有两次或两次以上PST评估的个体被纳入研究。纵向比较服用DMT 2年或更长时间的患者和停用DMT 2年或更长时间的患者以及服用高效DMT和低/中效DMT的患者的PST得分。采用近似线性回归模型来评估认知能力随时间变化的速率。使用多变量逻辑回归进行倾向评分调整。结果:该队列642人,539人服用DMT, 103人不服用DMT。DMT组的中位年龄和病程分别为49.7岁(四分位间距[IQR] 42.4-57.9)和16.6岁(四分位间距[IQR] 9.3-23.0),非DMT组的中位年龄和病程分别为58.9岁(IQR 52.2-65.3)和20.0岁(IQR 14.1-31.4)。两个队列均以女性为主(75% DMT, 79.6%非DMT),平均4次评估(IQR 3-5), DMT组的平均监测时间为1.9年(1.2-2.4),非DMT组的平均监测时间为1.8年(1.4-2.4)。经多因素调整后,发现DMT状态和强度不是纵向PST变化的显著预测因子。结论:在大约2年的时间里,DMT状态和强度都不是认知加工速度的显著预测因子。未来的前瞻性多中心试验需要进一步支持这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of MS care
International journal of MS care Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
Impact of Fingolimod Discontinuation Strategy on Recurrence of Disease Activity in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis. Expanding the Connection Between Cognition and Illness Intrusiveness in Multiple Sclerosis. Cognitive Function in Frail Older Adults With Multiple Sclerosis: An Exploratory Study Using Secondary Data Analysis. Exploring the Complexity of Falls in People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Qualitative Study. Reasons for Hospital Admission in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1