Learning Scores and Economics Instruction

William B. Walstad, Olga Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia
{"title":"Learning Scores and Economics Instruction","authors":"William B. Walstad, Olga Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia","doi":"10.1177/05694345231207868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explains how economics instructors can incorporate pretest and posttest assessments into their economics courses to make testing and related teaching more dynamic and interactive with students. Such assessments allow the correct and incorrect responses to pretest and posttest items to be used by instructors to create four learning scores that reveal different pathways of student learning—positive, retained, negative, and zero. Learning scores provide more insights into learning progression among students during an instructional unit or a course than is possible with the typical posttest only assessment. The study explains how learning scores can be used by economics instructors to analyze classroom or group learning, to diagnose individual student understandings or misunderstandings, and assess how each test item contributes to student learning. It discusses the practical applications and extensions of learning score analysis that make it realistic for economics instructors to use and addresses measurement concerns.","PeriodicalId":85623,"journal":{"name":"The American economist","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American economist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/05694345231207868","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explains how economics instructors can incorporate pretest and posttest assessments into their economics courses to make testing and related teaching more dynamic and interactive with students. Such assessments allow the correct and incorrect responses to pretest and posttest items to be used by instructors to create four learning scores that reveal different pathways of student learning—positive, retained, negative, and zero. Learning scores provide more insights into learning progression among students during an instructional unit or a course than is possible with the typical posttest only assessment. The study explains how learning scores can be used by economics instructors to analyze classroom or group learning, to diagnose individual student understandings or misunderstandings, and assess how each test item contributes to student learning. It discusses the practical applications and extensions of learning score analysis that make it realistic for economics instructors to use and addresses measurement concerns.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学习分数和经济学指导
本研究解释了经济学教师如何将测试前和测试后的评估纳入他们的经济学课程,使测试和相关教学与学生更具活力和互动性。这种评估允许教师使用对测试前和测试后项目的正确和不正确的反应来创建四种学习分数,这些分数揭示了学生学习的不同途径-积极,保留,消极和零。学习成绩在一个教学单元或一门课程中提供了更多关于学生学习进展的见解,而不是典型的后测评估。该研究解释了经济学讲师如何使用学习分数来分析课堂或小组学习,诊断个别学生的理解或误解,并评估每个测试项目对学生学习的贡献。它讨论了学习分数分析的实际应用和扩展,使经济学讲师能够实际使用和解决测量问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
The Michael Szenberg Prize for the Best Article Published by The American Economist
IF 0 The American economistPub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI: 10.1177/05694345231154682
Carlos J. Asarta
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Applying Normative Ethics to Teach Economic Concepts: A Proposal Leveraging Peer Resources to Promote Undergraduate Education and Well-being Book review: For a Dollar and a Dream: State Lotteries in Modern America Learning From a Laureate: Dr. Vernon L. Smith Undergraduate Economics Program Enhancements to Increase Doctoral Program Participation by Under-Represented Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1