Measuring safety perceptions of students with behavioural problems in special education: A validation study of the safe at school questionnaire

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL British Journal of Special Education Pub Date : 2023-11-06 DOI:10.1111/1467-8578.12494
G. H. P. Van der Helm, G.J. Klapwijk, J. J. Roest, C. H. Z. Kuiper, R. H. J. Scholte, G. J. J. M. Stams
{"title":"Measuring safety perceptions of students with behavioural problems in special education: A validation study of the safe at school questionnaire","authors":"G. H. P. Van der Helm,&nbsp;G.J. Klapwijk,&nbsp;J. J. Roest,&nbsp;C. H. Z. Kuiper,&nbsp;R. H. J. Scholte,&nbsp;G. J. J. M. Stams","doi":"10.1111/1467-8578.12494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Assessment and monitoring of safety in special education schools is imperative to establish and maintain a safe environment in which students can develop academic and social–emotional skills. The present study describes the development of a student self-report measure, the Safe at School questionnaire. Factorial validity, reliability and concurrent validity was examined in a construction sample of 280 students (68.6% male, age <i>M</i> = 13.29, <i>SD</i> = 2.52) and a validation sample of 1572 students (77.4% male; age <i>M</i> = 14.33, <i>SD</i> = 2.04), representing 233 classes from 20 schools for special education in the Netherlands. Multilevel confirmatory factor analysis was used to examine the factor structure of the Safe at School questionnaire. A model with three correlating factors at the within- and between-group level (Rules and Social Norms, Perceived Own Safety and Perceived Safety of Other Students) showed a satisfactory fit to the data. Reliabilities of the scales were good. Also, measurement invariance for gender was demonstrated, indicating no differences in latent means between boys and girls. Implications for practice and future research are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":46054,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Special Education","volume":"51 1","pages":"60-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8578.12494","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Special Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8578.12494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Assessment and monitoring of safety in special education schools is imperative to establish and maintain a safe environment in which students can develop academic and social–emotional skills. The present study describes the development of a student self-report measure, the Safe at School questionnaire. Factorial validity, reliability and concurrent validity was examined in a construction sample of 280 students (68.6% male, age M = 13.29, SD = 2.52) and a validation sample of 1572 students (77.4% male; age M = 14.33, SD = 2.04), representing 233 classes from 20 schools for special education in the Netherlands. Multilevel confirmatory factor analysis was used to examine the factor structure of the Safe at School questionnaire. A model with three correlating factors at the within- and between-group level (Rules and Social Norms, Perceived Own Safety and Perceived Safety of Other Students) showed a satisfactory fit to the data. Reliabilities of the scales were good. Also, measurement invariance for gender was demonstrated, indicating no differences in latent means between boys and girls. Implications for practice and future research are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
测量有行为问题的特殊教育学生的安全感:学校安全问卷验证研究
特殊教育学校的安全评估和监测对于建立和维护一个安全的环境,使学生能够发展学术和社会情感技能来说是必不可少的。本研究介绍了学生自我报告测量方法--"学校安全 "问卷的开发情况。研究人员对来自荷兰 20 所特殊教育学校 233 个班级的 280 名学生(68.6% 为男性,年龄中位数 = 13.29,标准差 = 2.52)的构建样本和 1572 名学生(77.4% 为男性,年龄中位数 = 14.33,标准差 = 2.04)的验证样本进行了因子效度、信度和并发效度检验。多层次确认性因素分析用于研究 "校园安全 "问卷的因素结构。一个包含三个组内和组间相关因子(规则和社会规范、自身安全感和其他学生安全感)的模型对数据的拟合效果令人满意。量表的信度良好。此外,性别测量不变性也得到了证明,表明男生和女生之间的潜在平均值没有差异。本文讨论了对实践和未来研究的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
15.40%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: This well-established and respected journal covers the whole range of learning difficulties relating to children in mainstream and special schools. It is widely read by nasen members as well as other practitioners, administrators advisers, teacher educators and researchers in the UK and overseas. The British Journal of Special Education is concerned with a wide range of special educational needs, and covers all levels of education pre-school, school, and post-school.
期刊最新文献
Social barriers faced by students with sensory impairment in higher education in Tanzania Issue Information Translational science in the science of reading: A case study Education policy development in England: Effective ‘mainstreaming’ of SEND provision Editorial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1