Ökonomien der Parodie am Wiener Vorstadttheater: Unterhaltungsdramatik in politischen und sozioökonomischen Krisenzeiten (1813–1830) by Matthias Mansky (review)

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Austrian Studies Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1353/oas.2023.a906963
{"title":"Ökonomien der Parodie am Wiener Vorstadttheater: Unterhaltungsdramatik in politischen und sozioökonomischen Krisenzeiten (1813–1830) by Matthias Mansky (review)","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/oas.2023.a906963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Ökonomien der Parodie am Wiener Vorstadttheater: Unterhaltungsdramatik in politischen und sozioökonomischen Krisenzeiten (1813–1830) by Matthias Mansky Jeffrey A. Hertel Matthias Mansky, Ökonomien der Parodie am Wiener Vorstadttheater: Unterhaltungsdramatik in politischen und sozioökonomischen Krisenzeiten (1813–1830). Hannover: Wehrhahn, 2022. 640 pp. The raucous farces, satires, and parodies of the Viennese Vorstadttheater have been an area of continual but ultimately limited research interest. The field remains understudied in spite of the stage being the primary mode of literary production for mass consumption during the first half of the nineteenth century, when the Habsburg monarchy was at its zenith of influence in Europe. Though this period is often described as a time of reactionary censorship, Biedermeier retreats into the domestic sphere, and apparent disinterest in social and political issues, there is reason to question this received narrative. One of the most important recent attempts to complicate the image [End Page 103] of Ruhe and Ordnung arrives with the publication of Matthias Mansky's Ökonomien der Parodie am Wiener Volksstadttheater. Combining a survey of the parodic \"economies\" of the Viennese stage with their relationship to bread-and-butter questions of the day, the volume introduces, contextualizes, and reproduces six of the most biting parodies of the time. The work ends with commentary on the parodies by reviewers in the original context and editorial remarks on the texts. Taken as a whole, Mansky offers an illuminating presentation of an important yet arcane corner of the nineteenth-century Viennese stage and the accompanying public sphere quite in line with recent critical approaches to the period from more researched areas of German Studies. With few exceptions, previous studies of the Viennese Vorstadttheater have focused on a handful of authors (Ferdinand Raimund, Johann Nestroy) and their relationship to received morality and government censorship. While these basic interpretive elements still animate Ökonomien der Parodie, the volume compounds the traditional picture by walking readers through the intertextual network of the parodic stage, where works exist in close relationship to referents outside of that which is on stage. This extends not just to other texts but also to the lived experiences of audiences. In this way, Mansky manages to recreate the most salient socioeconomic and discursive spheres in which parody acted as an intellectual and cultural currency of the time, offering a welcome addition to studies like Meike Wagner's Theater und Öffentlichkeit im Vormärz (Akademie Verlag, 2013). One example of the importance of Mansky's revision of established discourses comes in explaining the backhanded nature of many of the dramas' \"Happy Ende.\" Many parodies are peopled by figures of low class status, and many of the works end with that most quintessential of happy endings: a wedding. While this is a trope almost universal to the comic stage, Mansky makes a crucial point: Most of the people getting married are poor, a circumstance that aims a satiric barb directly at a legally binding \"obrigkeitliche Heiratserlaubnis\" that, aiming to prevent a \"Vermehrung der unerwünschten verarmten Massen,\" \"sollte sicherstellen, dass die Existenz des Paares von vornherein finanziell abgesichert war\" (44). This sort of insight extends the approach championed by Patrick Eiden-Offe in Poesie der Klasse (Matthes und Seitz, 2017), who argues, using the example of Ludwig Tieck, that the supposedly apolitical nature of Unterhaltungsliteratur can be [End Page 104] productively reframed by considering the socioeconomic implications of myriad topics in Biedermeier literature. Tongue-in-cheek references to Missstände in the reigning sociopolitical circumstances abound throughout the period and come into sharp relief through this volume's six parodies. The works lampoon a range of material from highbrow dramatic works such as Schiller's Die Verschwörung des Fiesco zu Genua and Die Jungfrau von Orleans—retooled as Fiesko der Salamikrämer by Joseph Alois Gleich and Die Jungfrau von Wien by Hermann Herzenskron—to more lowbrow fare like August von Kotzebue's Menschenhass und Reue, reinterpreted by Adolf Bäuerle as Der Leopoldstag oder: Kein Menschenhass und keine Reue. In each of these titles, we see one of the most salient mechanisms by which parodic culture flourished: the localization or parodic provincialization of aesthetic content, which ridiculed a universal aesthetic and simultaneously made...","PeriodicalId":40350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Austrian Studies","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Austrian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/oas.2023.a906963","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reviewed by: Ökonomien der Parodie am Wiener Vorstadttheater: Unterhaltungsdramatik in politischen und sozioökonomischen Krisenzeiten (1813–1830) by Matthias Mansky Jeffrey A. Hertel Matthias Mansky, Ökonomien der Parodie am Wiener Vorstadttheater: Unterhaltungsdramatik in politischen und sozioökonomischen Krisenzeiten (1813–1830). Hannover: Wehrhahn, 2022. 640 pp. The raucous farces, satires, and parodies of the Viennese Vorstadttheater have been an area of continual but ultimately limited research interest. The field remains understudied in spite of the stage being the primary mode of literary production for mass consumption during the first half of the nineteenth century, when the Habsburg monarchy was at its zenith of influence in Europe. Though this period is often described as a time of reactionary censorship, Biedermeier retreats into the domestic sphere, and apparent disinterest in social and political issues, there is reason to question this received narrative. One of the most important recent attempts to complicate the image [End Page 103] of Ruhe and Ordnung arrives with the publication of Matthias Mansky's Ökonomien der Parodie am Wiener Volksstadttheater. Combining a survey of the parodic "economies" of the Viennese stage with their relationship to bread-and-butter questions of the day, the volume introduces, contextualizes, and reproduces six of the most biting parodies of the time. The work ends with commentary on the parodies by reviewers in the original context and editorial remarks on the texts. Taken as a whole, Mansky offers an illuminating presentation of an important yet arcane corner of the nineteenth-century Viennese stage and the accompanying public sphere quite in line with recent critical approaches to the period from more researched areas of German Studies. With few exceptions, previous studies of the Viennese Vorstadttheater have focused on a handful of authors (Ferdinand Raimund, Johann Nestroy) and their relationship to received morality and government censorship. While these basic interpretive elements still animate Ökonomien der Parodie, the volume compounds the traditional picture by walking readers through the intertextual network of the parodic stage, where works exist in close relationship to referents outside of that which is on stage. This extends not just to other texts but also to the lived experiences of audiences. In this way, Mansky manages to recreate the most salient socioeconomic and discursive spheres in which parody acted as an intellectual and cultural currency of the time, offering a welcome addition to studies like Meike Wagner's Theater und Öffentlichkeit im Vormärz (Akademie Verlag, 2013). One example of the importance of Mansky's revision of established discourses comes in explaining the backhanded nature of many of the dramas' "Happy Ende." Many parodies are peopled by figures of low class status, and many of the works end with that most quintessential of happy endings: a wedding. While this is a trope almost universal to the comic stage, Mansky makes a crucial point: Most of the people getting married are poor, a circumstance that aims a satiric barb directly at a legally binding "obrigkeitliche Heiratserlaubnis" that, aiming to prevent a "Vermehrung der unerwünschten verarmten Massen," "sollte sicherstellen, dass die Existenz des Paares von vornherein finanziell abgesichert war" (44). This sort of insight extends the approach championed by Patrick Eiden-Offe in Poesie der Klasse (Matthes und Seitz, 2017), who argues, using the example of Ludwig Tieck, that the supposedly apolitical nature of Unterhaltungsliteratur can be [End Page 104] productively reframed by considering the socioeconomic implications of myriad topics in Biedermeier literature. Tongue-in-cheek references to Missstände in the reigning sociopolitical circumstances abound throughout the period and come into sharp relief through this volume's six parodies. The works lampoon a range of material from highbrow dramatic works such as Schiller's Die Verschwörung des Fiesco zu Genua and Die Jungfrau von Orleans—retooled as Fiesko der Salamikrämer by Joseph Alois Gleich and Die Jungfrau von Wien by Hermann Herzenskron—to more lowbrow fare like August von Kotzebue's Menschenhass und Reue, reinterpreted by Adolf Bäuerle as Der Leopoldstag oder: Kein Menschenhass und keine Reue. In each of these titles, we see one of the most salient mechanisms by which parodic culture flourished: the localization or parodic provincialization of aesthetic content, which ridiculed a universal aesthetic and simultaneously made...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《评论》1813—1830年
评论:Ökonomien der Parodie am Wiener Vorstadttheater: unterhaltungstheatrein politischen and sozioökonomischen Krisenzeiten(1813-1830)作者:Matthias Mansky Jeffrey A. Hertel Matthias Mansky Ökonomien der Parodie am Wiener Vorstadttheater: unterhaltungstheatrein politischen and sozioökonomischen Krisenzeiten(1813-1830)。汉诺威:Wehrhahn, 2022。维也纳沃尔施塔特剧院的喧闹闹剧、讽刺剧和模仿剧一直是一个持续但最终有限的研究兴趣领域。尽管在19世纪上半叶,当哈布斯堡王朝在欧洲的影响力达到顶峰时,这一阶段是大众消费文学作品的主要模式,但这一领域仍未得到充分研究。尽管这一时期经常被描述为反动审查的时期,比德迈尔退回到国内领域,对社会和政治问题明显不感兴趣,但有理由质疑这种公认的叙述。最近最重要的将《如河与奥登农》形象复杂化的尝试之一,是马提亚斯·曼斯基(Matthias Mansky)的《Ökonomien der parpardie am Wiener Volksstadttheater》的出版。结合对维也纳舞台的模仿“经济”及其与当时面包和黄油问题的关系的调查,该卷介绍,背景化,并再现了当时最尖刻的六个模仿。作品以评论家对原语境中的模仿的评论和对文本的编辑评论结束。作为一个整体,曼斯基对19世纪维也纳舞台的一个重要而神秘的角落以及随之而来的公共领域进行了启发性的展示,这与最近从德国研究的更多研究领域对这一时期的批评方法非常一致。除了少数例外,以前对维也纳Vorstadttheater的研究主要集中在少数作家(Ferdinand Raimund, Johann Nestroy)以及他们与公认道德和政府审查的关系上。虽然这些基本的解释元素仍然使Ökonomien der parpardie充满活力,但该卷通过引导读者穿越戏仿舞台的互文网络,使传统的画面更加复杂,在这里,作品与舞台之外的指涉物有着密切的关系。这不仅适用于其他文本,也适用于观众的生活体验。通过这种方式,曼斯基设法重建了最突出的社会经济和话语领域,在这些领域中,戏仿作为当时的知识和文化货币,为Meike Wagner的戏剧和Öffentlichkeit im Vormärz (Akademie Verlag, 2013)等研究提供了受欢迎的补充。曼斯基修正既定话语的重要性的一个例子是解释了许多戏剧“快乐结局”的反讽性质。许多戏仿作品中都有地位低下的人物,许多作品以最典型的幸福结局结束:婚礼。虽然这几乎是喜剧舞台上的一个普遍比喻,但曼斯基提出了一个关键的观点:大多数结婚的人都是穷人,这种情况直接讽刺了具有法律约束力的“obrigkeititliche Heiratserlaubnis”,旨在防止“Vermehrung der unerw nschten verarmten Massen”,“solte sicherstellen, dass die Existenz des Paares von vorn此处金融战争”(44)。这种见解扩展了Patrick eideno - offe在《诗歌》(Poesie der Klasse) (Matthes und Seitz, 2017)中所倡导的方法,他以路德维希·蒂克(Ludwig Tieck)为例认为,通过考虑比德梅尔文学中无数主题的社会经济含义,可以有效地重新构建所谓的非政治性质。在整个时期,对Missstände的半开玩笑的引用在当时的社会政治环境中比比皆是,并通过本卷的六个模仿得到了明显的缓解。这些作品讽刺了一系列的材料,从高雅的戏剧作品,如席勒的《舞会Verschwörung》和《奥尔兰少女》——被约瑟夫·阿洛伊斯·格列奇改编为《舞会Salamikrämer》和赫尔曼·赫森斯克伦的《维也纳少女》——到更通俗的作品,如奥古斯特·冯·科策布的《人之情深与情深》,被阿道夫·Bäuerle重新诠释为《利奥波德斯塔格德》:《人之情深与情深》。在这些标题中,我们看到了模仿文化蓬勃发展的一个最突出的机制:审美内容的本土化或模仿地方性,它嘲笑了普遍的审美,同时使……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Austrian Studies
Journal of Austrian Studies HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: The Journal of Austrian Studies is an interdisciplinary quarterly that publishes scholarly articles and book reviews on all aspects of the history and culture of Austria, Austro-Hungary, and the Habsburg territory. It is the flagship publication of the Austrian Studies Association and contains contributions in German and English from the world''s premiere scholars in the field of Austrian studies. The journal highlights scholarly work that draws on innovative methodologies and new ways of viewing Austrian history and culture. Although the journal was renamed in 2012 to reflect the increasing scope and diversity of its scholarship, it has a long lineage dating back over a half century as Modern Austrian Literature and, prior to that, The Journal of the International Arthur Schnitzler Research Association.
期刊最新文献
Paul Celan—"sah daß ein Blatt fiel und wußte, daß es eine Botschaft war": Neue Einsichten und Lektüren Hrsg. Martin A. Hainz (review) Oskar Kokoschka und Österreich: Facetten einer politischen Biografie by Bernadette Reinhold (review) WSD*: Die Bibliothek Wendelin Schmidt-Dengler und ihre Lesespuren ed. by Roland Innerhofer and Thomas Kohlwein (review) Rose Ausländers Leben im Wort by Olena Staranchuk, Oleg Gryshchenko und Oxana Matiychuk (review) Evolution of Servant Laws in the Habsburg Empire
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1