Displacement Commercial Risk (DCR) and the Level of Risk Sharing between Unrestricted Investment Account Holders (URIAHs) and Shareholders in an Islamic Bank

{"title":"Displacement Commercial Risk (DCR) and the Level of Risk Sharing between Unrestricted Investment Account Holders (URIAHs) and Shareholders in an Islamic Bank","authors":"","doi":"10.7176/ejbm/15-16-04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Islamic banks are exposed to a unique risk such as Displaced Commercial Risk (DCR). DCR arises when the Islamic banks forgo part or all its share of profits on the unrestricted investment account holders’ funds in order to increase the return to the unrestricted investment account holders. The level of risk sharing indicates the level of DCR absorbed by the shareholders of an Islamic bank for the bank pay to a competitive rate to the unrestricted investment account holders. Displacement commercial risk and level of risk sharing are two important concepts for Islamic bank and the regulatory authority. To demonstrate the concepts, this paper employs the Value at Risk (VaR) model to estimate the DCR and level of risk sharing in two Islamic banks in Bahrain. The results indicate that one of the banks experienced a DCR of between $15.342 million and $15.843 million with a risk sharing level of 97% while the second bank did not face DCR and has a risk sharing level of 0%. The paper concludes that since the capital adequacy ratios of Islamic banks are very sensitive to changes in DCR and level of risk sharing, setting a common risk sharing level for the industry is not a good idea as this will result in either overstating or understating the capital requirements of Islamic banks and this has some implications on resilience and stability of the banks as well as their competitiveness in the marketplace Keywords: Islamic bank, shareholders, displaced commercial risk, level of risk sharing, value at risk, unrestricted investment account holders DOI: 10.7176/EJBM/15-16-04 Publication date: September 30 th 2023","PeriodicalId":11878,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Business and Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Business and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7176/ejbm/15-16-04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Islamic banks are exposed to a unique risk such as Displaced Commercial Risk (DCR). DCR arises when the Islamic banks forgo part or all its share of profits on the unrestricted investment account holders’ funds in order to increase the return to the unrestricted investment account holders. The level of risk sharing indicates the level of DCR absorbed by the shareholders of an Islamic bank for the bank pay to a competitive rate to the unrestricted investment account holders. Displacement commercial risk and level of risk sharing are two important concepts for Islamic bank and the regulatory authority. To demonstrate the concepts, this paper employs the Value at Risk (VaR) model to estimate the DCR and level of risk sharing in two Islamic banks in Bahrain. The results indicate that one of the banks experienced a DCR of between $15.342 million and $15.843 million with a risk sharing level of 97% while the second bank did not face DCR and has a risk sharing level of 0%. The paper concludes that since the capital adequacy ratios of Islamic banks are very sensitive to changes in DCR and level of risk sharing, setting a common risk sharing level for the industry is not a good idea as this will result in either overstating or understating the capital requirements of Islamic banks and this has some implications on resilience and stability of the banks as well as their competitiveness in the marketplace Keywords: Islamic bank, shareholders, displaced commercial risk, level of risk sharing, value at risk, unrestricted investment account holders DOI: 10.7176/EJBM/15-16-04 Publication date: September 30 th 2023
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊斯兰银行的流离失所、商业风险(DCR)及无限制投资账户持有人与股东之间的风险分担水平
伊斯兰银行面临着一种独特的风险,如流离失所商业风险(DCR)。DCR是指伊斯兰银行为了增加不受限制的投资账户持有人的收益而放弃其在不受限制的投资账户持有人的资金上的部分或全部利润份额。风险分担水平是指伊斯兰银行的股东吸收的DCR水平,因为银行向不受限制的投资账户持有人支付有竞争力的利率。流离失所、商业风险和风险分担水平是伊斯兰银行和监管当局关注的两个重要概念。为了证明这些概念,本文采用风险价值(VaR)模型来估计巴林两家伊斯兰银行的DCR和风险分担水平。结果表明,其中一家银行的DCR在1534.2万美元至1584.3万美元之间,风险分担水平为97%,而另一家银行没有DCR,风险分担水平为0%。本文的结论是,由于伊斯兰银行的资本充足率对DCR和风险分担水平的变化非常敏感,为该行业设定一个共同的风险分担水平并不是一个好主意,因为这将导致高估或低估伊斯兰银行的资本要求,这对银行的弹性和稳定性以及它们在市场上的竞争力有一些影响。伊斯兰银行,股东,流离失所的商业风险,风险分担水平,风险价值,无限制投资账户持有人DOI: 10.7176/EJBM/15-16-04出版日期:2023年9月30日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Japan’s Software Industry and Its International Competitiveness The Usefulness of Applying Product and Service Innovations Through Quality Systems in the Food Industry Opportunities for Financing in Agriculture - The Example of the Republic of North Macedonia Export of Higher Education Services in Mongolia Addressing Cybersecurity and Privacy Concerns in E-Learning: Evidence from Kuwaiti Educational Sector
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1