The analysis of TIMSS 2015 data with confirmatory mixture item response theory: A multidimensional approach

IF 1 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY International Journal of Testing Pub Date : 2023-05-30 DOI:10.1080/15305058.2023.2214648
Fatima Munevver Saatcioglu, Sedat Sen
{"title":"The analysis of TIMSS 2015 data with confirmatory mixture item response theory: A multidimensional approach","authors":"Fatima Munevver Saatcioglu, Sedat Sen","doi":"10.1080/15305058.2023.2214648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractIn this study, we illustrated an application of the confirmatory mixture IRT model for multidimensional tests. We aimed to examine the differences in student performance by domains with a confirmatory mixture IRT modeling approach. A three-dimensional and three-class model was analyzed by assuming content domains as dimensions and cognitive domains as item groups. We estimated the item performance differences among the students through structural parameters. There were 463 students from Turkey and 880 students from Canada who participated in the TIMSS 2015 4th-grade mathematics assessment. Results for Turkey indicated, students in Class 2 had better performance in knowing and reasoning compared to those in Classes 1 and 3. Students in Class 2 and Class 3 were similar in applying math concepts compared to students in Class 1. For the Canadian sample, students in Class 2 had better performance in knowing, applying, and reasoning compared to those in Class 1 and 3. Also, Class 3 students were better at applying domain than Class 1. Also, mean values were obtained for all content domains in the two countries. Confirmatory mixture IRT modeling approaches appear to differentiate students’ mathematics competencies.Keywords: Confirmatory mixture IRT modelinglatent classmultidimensional modelTIMSS 2015","PeriodicalId":46615,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Testing","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Testing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2023.2214648","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractIn this study, we illustrated an application of the confirmatory mixture IRT model for multidimensional tests. We aimed to examine the differences in student performance by domains with a confirmatory mixture IRT modeling approach. A three-dimensional and three-class model was analyzed by assuming content domains as dimensions and cognitive domains as item groups. We estimated the item performance differences among the students through structural parameters. There were 463 students from Turkey and 880 students from Canada who participated in the TIMSS 2015 4th-grade mathematics assessment. Results for Turkey indicated, students in Class 2 had better performance in knowing and reasoning compared to those in Classes 1 and 3. Students in Class 2 and Class 3 were similar in applying math concepts compared to students in Class 1. For the Canadian sample, students in Class 2 had better performance in knowing, applying, and reasoning compared to those in Class 1 and 3. Also, Class 3 students were better at applying domain than Class 1. Also, mean values were obtained for all content domains in the two countries. Confirmatory mixture IRT modeling approaches appear to differentiate students’ mathematics competencies.Keywords: Confirmatory mixture IRT modelinglatent classmultidimensional modelTIMSS 2015
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
验证性混合项目反应理论对2015年TIMSS数据的多维分析
摘要在本研究中,我们展示了验证性混合IRT模型在多维测试中的应用。我们的目的是通过验证性混合IRT建模方法来检查不同领域学生表现的差异。以内容域为维度,认知域为项目组,分析了三维三类模型。我们通过结构参数来估计学生之间的项目绩效差异。有463名土耳其学生和880名加拿大学生参加了TIMSS 2015年四年级数学评估。结果显示,土耳其2班学生的认知和推理能力优于1班和3班学生。二、三班学生在应用数学概念方面与一班学生相似。在加拿大的样本中,2班的学生比1班和3班的学生在认知、应用和推理方面表现更好。此外,三班学生在应用领域方面也优于一班。此外,还获得了两国所有内容域的平均值。验证性混合IRT建模方法似乎可以区分学生的数学能力。关键词:验证性混合IRT模型;潜在分类;多维模型
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Testing
International Journal of Testing SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Combining Mokken Scale Analysis with and rasch measurement theory to explore differences in measurement quality between subgroups Examining the construct validity of the MIDUS version of the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire (MPQ) Beyond group comparisons: Accounting for intersectional sources of bias in international survey measures Can the dark core of personality be measured briefly, multidimensionally, and invariantly? The D25 measure Investigating the acquiescent responding impact in empathy measures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1