Understanding how they really feel: Lesson learned from four approaches to soliciting user preferences for new contraceptive products in development

Aurélie Brunie, Rebecca Callahan
{"title":"Understanding how they really feel: Lesson learned from four approaches to soliciting user preferences for new contraceptive products in development","authors":"Aurélie Brunie, Rebecca Callahan","doi":"10.12688/gatesopenres.14679.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<ns3:p><ns3:bold>Background</ns3:bold>: An expanded range of contraceptive methods could reduce unintended pregnancies. User preferences research is important for successful development of products people want to us. This paper describes four approaches to preferences research soliciting user input in different ways: 1) perspectives on contraceptive method characteristics, 2) reactions to products in development, 3) trade-offs between contraceptive method characteristics, and 4) “blue-sky” ideas on novel contraceptive technologies.</ns3:p><ns3:p> </ns3:p><ns3:p> <ns3:bold>Methods</ns3:bold>: We conducted two mixed-method studies: one implemented in Burkina Faso and Uganda combining three of these approaches, and the other implemented in India and Nigeria using two approaches. We share observations on the strengths and weaknesses of each approach and draw on our experience to highlight lessons learned for future user preferences studies.</ns3:p><ns3:p> </ns3:p><ns3:p> <ns3:bold>Results</ns3:bold>: Each approach contributes to product development in different ways, and the usefulness of each methodology depends on the product development stage and corresponding informational needs.</ns3:p><ns3:p> </ns3:p><ns3:p> <ns3:bold>Conclusions</ns3:bold>: Recommendations for future research include combining different methods, angles, and perspectives; using sequential designs whenever possible; tailoring product descriptions to user understanding for optimal feedback; and acknowledging the value and limitations of both quantitative results for modeling demand and idiosyncratic ideas to inspire development of new products.</ns3:p>","PeriodicalId":12593,"journal":{"name":"Gates Open Research","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gates Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.14679.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: An expanded range of contraceptive methods could reduce unintended pregnancies. User preferences research is important for successful development of products people want to us. This paper describes four approaches to preferences research soliciting user input in different ways: 1) perspectives on contraceptive method characteristics, 2) reactions to products in development, 3) trade-offs between contraceptive method characteristics, and 4) “blue-sky” ideas on novel contraceptive technologies. Methods: We conducted two mixed-method studies: one implemented in Burkina Faso and Uganda combining three of these approaches, and the other implemented in India and Nigeria using two approaches. We share observations on the strengths and weaknesses of each approach and draw on our experience to highlight lessons learned for future user preferences studies. Results: Each approach contributes to product development in different ways, and the usefulness of each methodology depends on the product development stage and corresponding informational needs. Conclusions: Recommendations for future research include combining different methods, angles, and perspectives; using sequential designs whenever possible; tailoring product descriptions to user understanding for optimal feedback; and acknowledging the value and limitations of both quantitative results for modeling demand and idiosyncratic ideas to inspire development of new products.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解他们的真实感受:从征求用户对开发中的新避孕产品偏好的四种方法中获得的经验教训
背景:扩大避孕方法的范围可以减少意外怀孕。用户偏好研究对于成功开发人们想要的产品非常重要。本文描述了四种偏好研究方法,以不同的方式征求用户的意见:1)对避孕方法特性的看法,2)对开发产品的反应,3)避孕方法特性之间的权衡,以及4)对新避孕技术的“蓝天”想法。方法:我们进行了两项混合方法研究:一项在布基纳法索和乌干达实施,结合了其中三种方法,另一项在印度和尼日利亚实施,使用两种方法。我们分享了对每种方法的优缺点的观察,并利用我们的经验来强调对未来用户偏好研究的经验教训。结果:每种方法以不同的方式对产品开发做出贡献,每种方法的有用性取决于产品开发阶段和相应的信息需求。结论:对未来研究的建议包括结合不同的方法、角度和视角;尽可能采用顺序设计;根据用户理解定制产品描述,以获得最佳反馈;并承认对需求建模的定量结果和激发新产品开发的特殊想法的价值和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gates Open Research
Gates Open Research Immunology and Microbiology-Immunology and Microbiology (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
期刊最新文献
Developing a framework for understanding policy decision-making behaviors in the transition of an HIV prevention program towards sustainability: a case study from Zambia's voluntary medical male circumcision program. Knowledge and uptake of contraceptive and other sexual reproductive health services among in-school adolescents in three South African townships: Baseline findings from the Girls Achieve Power (GAP Year) Trial. Using models and maps to inform Target Product Profiles and Preferred Product Characteristics: the example of Wolbachia replacement. Vaccine decision-making among pregnant women: a protocol for a cross-sectional mixed-method study in Brazil, Ghana, Kenya and Pakistan. Simulated data for census-scale entity resolution research without privacy restrictions: a large-scale dataset generated by individual-based modeling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1