A Scoping Review of Workplace Interventions to Promote Positive Attitudes Toward Older Workers and Reduce Age-Based Discrimination

IF 2.7 2区 经济学 Q2 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR Work Aging and Retirement Pub Date : 2023-05-30 DOI:10.1093/workar/waad013
Craig Sinclair, Tomer Joffe, Natasha Ginnivan, Sharon K Parker, Kaarin J Anstey
{"title":"A Scoping Review of Workplace Interventions to Promote Positive Attitudes Toward Older Workers and Reduce Age-Based Discrimination","authors":"Craig Sinclair, Tomer Joffe, Natasha Ginnivan, Sharon K Parker, Kaarin J Anstey","doi":"10.1093/workar/waad013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Population aging trends have created a need for effective policies to extend adult working lives. Previous research has identified the prevalence of negative attitudes (age-related stereotypes, prejudice, and discriminatory behaviors) directed toward older workers in the workplace context. The current scoping review aimed to describe and assess the current evidence in support of different types of interventions aimed at promoting positive attitudes and reducing age-based discrimination in the workplace context. A search of peer-reviewed and grey literature databases identified 22 relevant studies, including data from 5,078 adult participants, across laboratory and field settings. From examination of these studies, we propose and describe four thematic categories of interventions, as a way of organizing this literature: “de-biasing interventions,” “brief attitudinal interventions,” “age diversity workshop interventions,” and “structural or contextual interventions.” At the current point in time, studies assessing age diversity workshop interventions appear to be the strongest, having a clear theoretical basis, having a focus on interventions that can be delivered in workplace settings, and providing evidence for positive effects on measures that are meaningful for organizations and older workers. While a number of promising interventions have been tested, most studies were only able to demonstrate improvements in explicit measurements of attitudes toward older adults, immediately following the intervention. Collaborative partnerships with organizations and further high-quality studies (particularly in field settings) are required to support the development, evaluation, and implementation of interventions to promote positive attitudes toward older adults in real-world workplace settings.","PeriodicalId":46486,"journal":{"name":"Work Aging and Retirement","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work Aging and Retirement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waad013","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Population aging trends have created a need for effective policies to extend adult working lives. Previous research has identified the prevalence of negative attitudes (age-related stereotypes, prejudice, and discriminatory behaviors) directed toward older workers in the workplace context. The current scoping review aimed to describe and assess the current evidence in support of different types of interventions aimed at promoting positive attitudes and reducing age-based discrimination in the workplace context. A search of peer-reviewed and grey literature databases identified 22 relevant studies, including data from 5,078 adult participants, across laboratory and field settings. From examination of these studies, we propose and describe four thematic categories of interventions, as a way of organizing this literature: “de-biasing interventions,” “brief attitudinal interventions,” “age diversity workshop interventions,” and “structural or contextual interventions.” At the current point in time, studies assessing age diversity workshop interventions appear to be the strongest, having a clear theoretical basis, having a focus on interventions that can be delivered in workplace settings, and providing evidence for positive effects on measures that are meaningful for organizations and older workers. While a number of promising interventions have been tested, most studies were only able to demonstrate improvements in explicit measurements of attitudes toward older adults, immediately following the intervention. Collaborative partnerships with organizations and further high-quality studies (particularly in field settings) are required to support the development, evaluation, and implementation of interventions to promote positive attitudes toward older adults in real-world workplace settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
促进对老年工人的积极态度和减少年龄歧视的工作场所干预的范围审查
人口老龄化趋势已经产生了有效的政策,以延长成年人的工作寿命的需求。之前的研究已经发现,职场中普遍存在针对年长员工的负面态度(与年龄有关的刻板印象、偏见和歧视行为)。当前的范围审查旨在描述和评估支持不同类型的干预措施的现有证据,这些干预措施旨在促进积极态度和减少工作场所中基于年龄的歧视。对同行评审和灰色文献数据库的搜索确定了22项相关研究,包括来自实验室和现场设置的5,078名成人参与者的数据。通过对这些研究的考察,我们提出并描述了四个主题干预类别,作为组织文献的一种方式:“去偏见干预”、“简短态度干预”、“年龄多样性研讨会干预”和“结构或情境干预”。在目前的时间点上,评估年龄多样性研讨会干预措施的研究似乎是最强的,具有明确的理论基础,专注于可以在工作场所环境中提供的干预措施,并为对组织和老年工人有意义的措施的积极影响提供证据。虽然许多有希望的干预措施已经得到了测试,但大多数研究只能证明,在干预之后,对老年人的态度的明确测量结果有所改善。需要与组织的合作伙伴关系和进一步的高质量研究(特别是在实地环境中)来支持干预措施的发展、评估和实施,以促进在现实世界的工作场所环境中对老年人的积极态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
21.60%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Empowering the Care of Older Adults Through the Use of Technology. Aging Workforce in the Context of Technological Advancements: Toward a Socio-Ecological Model Employment Effects of Incentivized Gradual Retirement Plans The Road to Retirement: A Life Course Perspective on Labor Market Trajectories and Retirement Behaviors Cognitive Health Disparities by Race and Ethnicity: The Role of Occupational Complexity and Occupational Status
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1