Exploring growth mindset experiences in university students

Anita L. Campbell
{"title":"Exploring growth mindset experiences in university students","authors":"Anita L. Campbell","doi":"10.1080/0020739x.2023.2255212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractStudents that classify as having growth mindsets rather than fixed mindsets enjoy greater academic success. This finding has been repeated in a variety of contexts and encourages teachers and researchers to develop growth mindsets in students. However, neutral and negative conclusions from some mindset intervention studies raise questions about the conditions in which growth mindsets develop. This study contributes evidence and suggestions to guide the development and assessment of growth mindsets in university students. The five-stage behaviour change model provides a framework to explain why mindset interventions may cause shifts that are not detected in the short term. Mindset assessment methods with original and adapted scales are presented and critiqued. I compare literature-sourced experiences used in growth mindset interventions with interview data from seven first-year engineering students at a South African university to help determine if growth mindset interventions for university students are worth implementing. I summarise implications for practice when assessing mindsets or using growth mindset interventions.KEYWORDS: Academic achievementuniversity studentsfixed mindsetimplicit theories of intelligencestudent successinterventionbehaviour change AcknowledgementsI am grateful to helpful suggestions from my PhD supervisors Tracy Craig and Brandon Collier-Reed, anonymous reviewers, and members of Helen Sword's WriteSPACE. Special thanks to the students who generously volunteered their time for interviews. This work is adapted from a chapter in my PhD (Campbell, Citation2020).Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by National Research Foundation [grant number TTK160531166788]; University of Cape Town.","PeriodicalId":14026,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739x.2023.2255212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractStudents that classify as having growth mindsets rather than fixed mindsets enjoy greater academic success. This finding has been repeated in a variety of contexts and encourages teachers and researchers to develop growth mindsets in students. However, neutral and negative conclusions from some mindset intervention studies raise questions about the conditions in which growth mindsets develop. This study contributes evidence and suggestions to guide the development and assessment of growth mindsets in university students. The five-stage behaviour change model provides a framework to explain why mindset interventions may cause shifts that are not detected in the short term. Mindset assessment methods with original and adapted scales are presented and critiqued. I compare literature-sourced experiences used in growth mindset interventions with interview data from seven first-year engineering students at a South African university to help determine if growth mindset interventions for university students are worth implementing. I summarise implications for practice when assessing mindsets or using growth mindset interventions.KEYWORDS: Academic achievementuniversity studentsfixed mindsetimplicit theories of intelligencestudent successinterventionbehaviour change AcknowledgementsI am grateful to helpful suggestions from my PhD supervisors Tracy Craig and Brandon Collier-Reed, anonymous reviewers, and members of Helen Sword's WriteSPACE. Special thanks to the students who generously volunteered their time for interviews. This work is adapted from a chapter in my PhD (Campbell, Citation2020).Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by National Research Foundation [grant number TTK160531166788]; University of Cape Town.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索大学生成长心态的体验
【摘要】拥有成长型思维模式的学生比拥有固定型思维模式的学生在学业上更成功。这一发现已经在各种情况下重复,并鼓励教师和研究人员培养学生的成长心态。然而,从一些心态干预研究中得出的中立和消极的结论提出了关于成长心态形成的条件的问题。本研究为指导大学生成长心态的发展与评估提供了依据与建议。五阶段行为改变模型提供了一个框架来解释为什么心态干预可能会导致短期内无法察觉的转变。提出并批判了原有的和适应的心态评估方法。我将成长型心态干预中使用的文献经验与来自南非一所大学七名一年级工程专业学生的访谈数据进行了比较,以帮助确定对大学生实施成长型心态干预是否值得。我总结了在评估心态或使用成长型心态干预时对实践的影响。关键词:学业成就大学生固定思维内隐智力理论学生成功干预行为改变致谢感谢我的博士导师Tracy Craig和Brandon Collier-Reed,匿名审稿人,以及Helen Sword的WriteSPACE的成员给我提供的有益建议。特别感谢那些慷慨地自愿参加面试的学生。这项工作改编自我博士论文中的一章(Campbell, Citation2020)。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。本研究由国家研究基金资助[批准号:TTK160531166788];开普敦大学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: Mathematics is pervading every study and technique in our modern world, bringing ever more sharply into focus the responsibilities laid upon those whose task it is to teach it. Most prominent among these is the difficulty of presenting an interdisciplinary approach so that one professional group may benefit from the experience of others. The International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology provides a medium by which a wide range of experience in mathematical education can be presented, assimilated and eventually adapted to everyday needs in schools, colleges, polytechnics, universities, industry and commerce. Contributions will be welcomed from lecturers, teachers and users of mathematics at all levels on the contents of syllabuses and methods of presentation.
期刊最新文献
  A meta-analysis on the effectiveness of Dynamic mathematics Software on K-12 students' mathematics learning Proof exploration using dynamic geometry systems with integrated automated deduction capabilities Fostering preservice teachers’ mathematical discourse through virtual simulation teaching Application of the method of lines to the wave equation for simulating vibrating strings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1