The fall after the hatching: Evolution and engagement of Greta Thunberg’s frame on Twitter

Sílvia Díaz-Pérez, Roger Soler-i-Martí, Mònica Figueras-Maz
{"title":"The fall after the hatching: Evolution and engagement of Greta Thunberg’s frame on Twitter","authors":"Sílvia Díaz-Pérez, Roger Soler-i-Martí, Mònica Figueras-Maz","doi":"10.1386/cjcs_00090_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Greta Thunberg pushed forward a new collective action frame for the climate movement with the necessary resonance to mobilize millions of people. However, the coronavirus outbreak forced Thunberg to adjust her strategy in an abrupt way, and the resonance of the activist’s frame decreased after achieving its peak in 2019. How has Thunberg’s frame evolved before, during and after the pandemic? Can we attribute the loss of resonance to a failed frame adaptation? This article studies the composition and resonance of the Swedish activist’s frame on Twitter between August 2018 and December 2022, making use of a methodological design that combines qualitative and quantitative methods to analyse 61 public interventions and 1692 tweets. The results show that, despite adapting successfully to the pandemic, the loss of the core elements of the original frame provoked a misalignment between her framing strategy and her storytelling, which reduced Thunberg’s ability to provide resonance.","PeriodicalId":53977,"journal":{"name":"Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/cjcs_00090_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Greta Thunberg pushed forward a new collective action frame for the climate movement with the necessary resonance to mobilize millions of people. However, the coronavirus outbreak forced Thunberg to adjust her strategy in an abrupt way, and the resonance of the activist’s frame decreased after achieving its peak in 2019. How has Thunberg’s frame evolved before, during and after the pandemic? Can we attribute the loss of resonance to a failed frame adaptation? This article studies the composition and resonance of the Swedish activist’s frame on Twitter between August 2018 and December 2022, making use of a methodological design that combines qualitative and quantitative methods to analyse 61 public interventions and 1692 tweets. The results show that, despite adapting successfully to the pandemic, the loss of the core elements of the original frame provoked a misalignment between her framing strategy and her storytelling, which reduced Thunberg’s ability to provide resonance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
孵化后的堕落:格蕾塔·桑伯格(Greta Thunberg)在Twitter上的框架的演变和参与
Greta Thunberg为气候运动提出了一个新的集体行动框架,引起了数百万人的共鸣。然而,冠状病毒的爆发迫使桑伯格突然调整了策略,活动家框架的共鸣在2019年达到顶峰后有所下降。在大流行之前、期间和之后,Thunberg的框架是如何演变的?我们能否将共振的丧失归因于失败的帧适应?本文研究了2018年8月至2022年12月期间瑞典活动家在推特上的框架的构成和共鸣,利用结合定性和定量方法的方法论设计来分析61次公共干预和1692条推文。结果表明,尽管成功地适应了大流行,但失去了原始框架的核心元素,导致她的框架策略和她的故事叙述之间出现了错位,这降低了滕伯格提供共鸣的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
20.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Quality journalism and advocacy in raising climate awareness: The case of The Guardian Social inequalities in the making sense of climate change narratives Analysis of climate denialism on YouTube: Refuting instead of debating El bucle invisible (The Invisible Loop), Remedios Zafra (2022) The pluriverse of the Anthropocene: One Earth, many worlds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1