Comparing Reservoir Artificial and Spiking Neural Networks in Machine Fault Detection Tasks

IF 3.7 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Big Data and Cognitive Computing Pub Date : 2023-06-05 DOI:10.3390/bdcc7020110
Vladislav Kholkin, Olga Druzhina, Valerii Vatnik, Maksim Kulagin, Timur Karimov, Denis Butusov
{"title":"Comparing Reservoir Artificial and Spiking Neural Networks in Machine Fault Detection Tasks","authors":"Vladislav Kholkin, Olga Druzhina, Valerii Vatnik, Maksim Kulagin, Timur Karimov, Denis Butusov","doi":"10.3390/bdcc7020110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For the last two decades, artificial neural networks (ANNs) of the third generation, also known as spiking neural networks (SNN), have remained a subject of interest for researchers. A significant difficulty for the practical application of SNNs is their poor suitability for von Neumann computer architecture, so many researchers are currently focusing on the development of alternative hardware. Nevertheless, today several experimental libraries implementing SNNs for conventional computers are available. In this paper, using the RCNet library, we compare the performance of reservoir computing architectures based on artificial and spiking neural networks. We explicitly show that, despite the higher execution time, SNNs can demonstrate outstanding classification accuracy in the case of complicated datasets, such as data from industrial sensors used for the fault detection of bearings and gears. For one of the test problems, namely, ball bearing diagnosis using an accelerometer, the accuracy of the classification using reservoir SNN almost reached 100%, while the reservoir ANN was able to achieve recognition accuracy up to only 61%. The results of the study clearly demonstrate the superiority and benefits of SNN classificators.","PeriodicalId":36397,"journal":{"name":"Big Data and Cognitive Computing","volume":"68 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Big Data and Cognitive Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc7020110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

For the last two decades, artificial neural networks (ANNs) of the third generation, also known as spiking neural networks (SNN), have remained a subject of interest for researchers. A significant difficulty for the practical application of SNNs is their poor suitability for von Neumann computer architecture, so many researchers are currently focusing on the development of alternative hardware. Nevertheless, today several experimental libraries implementing SNNs for conventional computers are available. In this paper, using the RCNet library, we compare the performance of reservoir computing architectures based on artificial and spiking neural networks. We explicitly show that, despite the higher execution time, SNNs can demonstrate outstanding classification accuracy in the case of complicated datasets, such as data from industrial sensors used for the fault detection of bearings and gears. For one of the test problems, namely, ball bearing diagnosis using an accelerometer, the accuracy of the classification using reservoir SNN almost reached 100%, while the reservoir ANN was able to achieve recognition accuracy up to only 61%. The results of the study clearly demonstrate the superiority and benefits of SNN classificators.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
水库人工神经网络与峰值神经网络在机械故障检测任务中的比较
在过去的二十年里,第三代人工神经网络(ANNs),也被称为峰值神经网络(SNN),一直是研究人员感兴趣的课题。snn在实际应用中的一个重大困难是其对von Neumann计算机体系结构的适用性较差,因此目前许多研究人员都在关注替代硬件的开发。尽管如此,目前已有几个在传统计算机上实现snn的实验库。在本文中,我们使用RCNet库,比较了基于人工和峰值神经网络的油藏计算架构的性能。我们明确地表明,尽管执行时间更长,snn在复杂数据集的情况下可以表现出出色的分类精度,例如用于轴承和齿轮故障检测的工业传感器的数据。对于其中一个测试问题,即使用加速度计诊断滚珠轴承,使用储层SNN的分类准确率几乎达到100%,而储层ANN的识别准确率仅为61%。研究结果清楚地证明了SNN分类器的优越性和优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Big Data and Cognitive Computing
Big Data and Cognitive Computing Business, Management and Accounting-Management Information Systems
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.10%
发文量
128
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Survey of Incremental Deep Learning for Defect Detection in Manufacturing BNMI-DINA: A Bayesian Cognitive Diagnosis Model for Enhanced Personalized Learning Semantic Similarity of Common Verbal Expressions in Older Adults through a Pre-Trained Model Knowledge-Based and Generative-AI-Driven Pedagogical Conversational Agents: A Comparative Study of Grice’s Cooperative Principles and Trust Distributed Bayesian Inference for Large-Scale IoT Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1