Neutrosophic Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methodology to Identify Key Barriers in Education

Fatma Taher
{"title":"Neutrosophic Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methodology to Identify Key Barriers in Education","authors":"Fatma Taher","doi":"10.54216/ijns.220410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Various educational barriers have negative impacts on teachers, organizations, and students. Identify these barriers and introduce some strategies that give benefits to organizations. There are different conflicting barriers, so the concept of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) is used to deal with these barriers. We proposed an MCDM Framework to evaluate the education barriers and rank strategies to select the best one. We suggest a TOPSIS method to rank the alternatives. The TOPSIS method is integrated with the neutrosophic set to deal with uncertain information. The weights of the criteria are computed with the mean method. We collected ten barriers and nine strategies in this study. The results show that Promoting teacher motivation is the best of the nine strategies. We created a sensitivity analysis to show the model's effectiveness and the results' stability. The sensitivity analysis is made by changing the criteria weights and ranking the strategies. The results show that promoting teacher motivation is the best in all cases in sensitivity analysis.","PeriodicalId":192295,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Neutrosophic Science","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Neutrosophic Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54216/ijns.220410","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Various educational barriers have negative impacts on teachers, organizations, and students. Identify these barriers and introduce some strategies that give benefits to organizations. There are different conflicting barriers, so the concept of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) is used to deal with these barriers. We proposed an MCDM Framework to evaluate the education barriers and rank strategies to select the best one. We suggest a TOPSIS method to rank the alternatives. The TOPSIS method is integrated with the neutrosophic set to deal with uncertain information. The weights of the criteria are computed with the mean method. We collected ten barriers and nine strategies in this study. The results show that Promoting teacher motivation is the best of the nine strategies. We created a sensitivity analysis to show the model's effectiveness and the results' stability. The sensitivity analysis is made by changing the criteria weights and ranking the strategies. The results show that promoting teacher motivation is the best in all cases in sensitivity analysis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中性多标准决策方法识别教育中的关键障碍
各种教育障碍对教师、组织和学生都产生了负面影响。识别这些障碍,并引入一些给组织带来好处的策略。由于存在不同的冲突障碍,因此采用多准则决策(MCDM)的概念来处理这些障碍。我们提出了一个MCDM框架来评估教育障碍,并对策略进行排序以选择最佳策略。我们建议使用TOPSIS方法对备选方案进行排序。将TOPSIS方法与嗜中性集相结合,处理不确定信息。采用均值法计算各指标的权重。本研究收集了10个障碍和9个策略。结果表明,促进教师动机是九种策略中效果最好的一种。我们创建了一个敏感性分析来显示模型的有效性和结果的稳定性。通过改变指标权重,对策略进行排序,进行敏感性分析。结果表明,在所有情况下,促进教师动机是最好的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unveiling an Innovative Approach to Q-Complex Neutrosophic Soft Rings A Note on Invertible Neutrosophic Square Matrices Selection of neutral networks using q-rung neutrosophic vague soft set TOPSIS aggregating operator setting multi-criteria group decision making Polynomial ideals of a ring based on neutrosophic sets SEE Transform in Difference Equations and Differential-Difference Equations Compared With Neutrosophic Difference Equations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1