Spatiotemporal variability in the C-factor: An analysis using high resolution satellite imagery

IF 3.5 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES International Journal of Sediment Research Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijsrc.2023.10.002
Nabil Allataifeh , Ramesh Rudra , Prasad Daggupati , Jaskaran Dhiman , Pradeep Goel , Shiv Prasher
{"title":"Spatiotemporal variability in the C-factor: An analysis using high resolution satellite imagery","authors":"Nabil Allataifeh ,&nbsp;Ramesh Rudra ,&nbsp;Prasad Daggupati ,&nbsp;Jaskaran Dhiman ,&nbsp;Pradeep Goel ,&nbsp;Shiv Prasher","doi":"10.1016/j.ijsrc.2023.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Estimating the cover and management factor (<em>C</em>-factor) for Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) that varies spatially and temporally within a watershed is time-consuming and resource-intensive. The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) approach can offer a potential alternative for this process. The current study examines nine NDVI models to compare and evaluate their performance in estimating the <em>C</em>-factor values for an agricultural watershed in southwestern Ontario, Canada. Satellite imagery from 2013 to 2020 was used to analyze the models’ similarities and differences on a detailed spatial and temporal scale. The results showed different <em>C-</em>factor values for each model, reflecting that they were developed for different geographical areas and purposes. While the Karaburun model differed from all other models on an annual basis, a detailed combined analysis of different spatial and temporal scales revealed that it was similar to other models. Seasonal analysis was found to be adequate for the current study, as it reduced the resources required and provided an overall view of the vegetation situation. However, a detailed monthly analysis may be necessary when investigating a specific season. The current analysis found that the summer months of June, July, and August have similar trends when comparing different models for different land uses and individual months, which aligns with the seasonal analysis. In conclusion, the current study highlights the importance of incorporating spatial and temporal scales in hydrological modeling and provides valuable insight into the applicability of different NDVI models for estimating the <em>C-</em>factor for southwestern Ontario watersheds. These findings can help inform future research and aid in developing accurate models for estimating soil erosion in this region. The results also emphasize that the NDVI approach has the potential for estimating the USLE <em>C-</em>factor and improving the estimation of soil erosion from agricultural watersheds by incorporating a variable <em>C-</em>factor over time and space. However, further research is needed to validate each model and determine which model best suits the study area.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50290,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sediment Research","volume":"39 1","pages":"Pages 83-99"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1001627923000677/pdfft?md5=d8a33367072d50e5523779ba3b666d43&pid=1-s2.0-S1001627923000677-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sediment Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1001627923000677","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Estimating the cover and management factor (C-factor) for Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) that varies spatially and temporally within a watershed is time-consuming and resource-intensive. The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) approach can offer a potential alternative for this process. The current study examines nine NDVI models to compare and evaluate their performance in estimating the C-factor values for an agricultural watershed in southwestern Ontario, Canada. Satellite imagery from 2013 to 2020 was used to analyze the models’ similarities and differences on a detailed spatial and temporal scale. The results showed different C-factor values for each model, reflecting that they were developed for different geographical areas and purposes. While the Karaburun model differed from all other models on an annual basis, a detailed combined analysis of different spatial and temporal scales revealed that it was similar to other models. Seasonal analysis was found to be adequate for the current study, as it reduced the resources required and provided an overall view of the vegetation situation. However, a detailed monthly analysis may be necessary when investigating a specific season. The current analysis found that the summer months of June, July, and August have similar trends when comparing different models for different land uses and individual months, which aligns with the seasonal analysis. In conclusion, the current study highlights the importance of incorporating spatial and temporal scales in hydrological modeling and provides valuable insight into the applicability of different NDVI models for estimating the C-factor for southwestern Ontario watersheds. These findings can help inform future research and aid in developing accurate models for estimating soil erosion in this region. The results also emphasize that the NDVI approach has the potential for estimating the USLE C-factor and improving the estimation of soil erosion from agricultural watersheds by incorporating a variable C-factor over time and space. However, further research is needed to validate each model and determine which model best suits the study area.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
C因子的时空变异性:利用高分辨率卫星图像进行分析
估算流域内随空间和时间变化的通用土壤流失方程(USLE)的覆盖和管理因子(C-因子)既费时又耗费资源。归一化植被指数 (NDVI) 方法可为这一过程提供潜在的替代方案。本研究考察了九种归一化差异植被指数模型,以比较和评估它们在估算加拿大安大略省西南部一个农业流域的碳因子值方面的性能。研究使用了 2013 年至 2020 年的卫星图像,以详细的空间和时间尺度分析模型的异同。结果显示,每个模型的碳因子值都不同,这反映出它们是针对不同的地理区域和目的而开发的。虽然卡拉布伦模式在年度基础上与所有其他模式不同,但对不同空间和时间尺度的详细综合分析表明,它与其他模式相似。研究发现,季节分析足以满足当前研究的需要,因为它减少了所需的资源,并提供了植被状况的整体视图。不过,在调查特定季节时,可能有必要进行详细的月度分析。目前的分析发现,在比较不同土地用途和单个月份的不同模型时,6 月、7 月和 8 月这三个夏季月份的趋势相似,这与季节分析相一致。总之,当前的研究强调了在水文建模中纳入空间和时间尺度的重要性,并就不同的 NDVI 模型在估算安大略省西南部流域的碳因子方面的适用性提供了宝贵的见解。这些发现有助于为未来的研究提供信息,并帮助开发用于估算该地区土壤侵蚀的精确模型。研究结果还强调,NDVI 方法具有估算 USLE 碳因子的潜力,并可通过纳入随时间和空间变化的碳因子来改进对农业流域土壤侵蚀的估算。不过,还需要进一步研究来验证每种模型,并确定哪种模型最适合研究区域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Sediment Research
International Journal of Sediment Research 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
88
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: International Journal of Sediment Research, the Official Journal of The International Research and Training Center on Erosion and Sedimentation and The World Association for Sedimentation and Erosion Research, publishes scientific and technical papers on all aspects of erosion and sedimentation interpreted in its widest sense. The subject matter is to include not only the mechanics of sediment transport and fluvial processes, but also what is related to geography, geomorphology, soil erosion, watershed management, sedimentology, environmental and ecological impacts of sedimentation, social and economical effects of sedimentation and its assessment, etc. Special attention is paid to engineering problems related to sedimentation and erosion.
期刊最新文献
TOC Quantification of bedload transport in the Hungarian Danube using multiple analysis methods Biogenic “phosphorus” effect of terrestrial lakes and its significance to oil shale during the Carnian period in the late Triassic Potential reuse of fine sediment from hydroelectric dams and recycled concrete sand in road subgrades Response of tenuous clay-polysaccharide flocs to hydrodynamic shearing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1