The mathematics-based learning method and its impact on student performance in the Introductory Accounting course: cognitive load theory

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of International Education in Business Pub Date : 2023-10-19 DOI:10.1108/jieb-11-2022-0086
Sony Warsono, Ratna Candra Sari, Laura Neviyanti Kusuma Putri, Muhammad Roy Aziz Haryana
{"title":"The mathematics-based learning method and its impact on student performance in the Introductory Accounting course: cognitive load theory","authors":"Sony Warsono, Ratna Candra Sari, Laura Neviyanti Kusuma Putri, Muhammad Roy Aziz Haryana","doi":"10.1108/jieb-11-2022-0086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This study aims to describe and examine the effectiveness of the mathematics-based learning method, called Accountamatics (Accounting from Mathematics perspective). The Accountamatics method is rooted in the principles of double-entry bookkeeping and the rules of debits and credits, which were initially documented by Luca Pacioli, a Mathematics Professor, in a mathematics book. Design/methodology/approach This study uses a quasi-experimental design, spanning a duration of one semester, to examine its research objectives. The participants included 230 students from the Faculty of Economics and Business in Indonesia, who were accredited by AACSB. Control variables, including gender, majors and study backgrounds, were taken into consideration. The data was analyzed using a linear regression test, followed by a comparative t -test. Findings The study findings show a significant positive impact of the Accountamatics method on student performance when compared to traditional learning approaches. Furthermore, the analysis indicates that the control variables examined in the study did not have a significant effect on student performance. Thus, it can be inferred that the implementation of the Accountamatics method has a beneficial effect on the academic performance of college students. Practical implications The study findings provide valuable insights for faculty members in higher education institutions, highlighting the potential benefits of incorporating mathematics-based teaching in accounting as an alternative approach for business students. These findings contribute to the existing knowledge on innovative teaching methods that can enhance the study of accounting within the business curriculum. Originality/value Over the span of around 25 years, extensive research has been conducted to compare traditional teaching methods with innovative approaches. However, the results have not consistently shown that the innovative methods outperform their traditional counterparts. In response to this, the Accountamatics method has been developed, building upon the fundamental knowledge in accounting that has been used since 1494. Despite its historical significance, this method is sometimes regarded as limited to technical knowledge in the modern era.","PeriodicalId":43809,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Education in Business","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Education in Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jieb-11-2022-0086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to describe and examine the effectiveness of the mathematics-based learning method, called Accountamatics (Accounting from Mathematics perspective). The Accountamatics method is rooted in the principles of double-entry bookkeeping and the rules of debits and credits, which were initially documented by Luca Pacioli, a Mathematics Professor, in a mathematics book. Design/methodology/approach This study uses a quasi-experimental design, spanning a duration of one semester, to examine its research objectives. The participants included 230 students from the Faculty of Economics and Business in Indonesia, who were accredited by AACSB. Control variables, including gender, majors and study backgrounds, were taken into consideration. The data was analyzed using a linear regression test, followed by a comparative t -test. Findings The study findings show a significant positive impact of the Accountamatics method on student performance when compared to traditional learning approaches. Furthermore, the analysis indicates that the control variables examined in the study did not have a significant effect on student performance. Thus, it can be inferred that the implementation of the Accountamatics method has a beneficial effect on the academic performance of college students. Practical implications The study findings provide valuable insights for faculty members in higher education institutions, highlighting the potential benefits of incorporating mathematics-based teaching in accounting as an alternative approach for business students. These findings contribute to the existing knowledge on innovative teaching methods that can enhance the study of accounting within the business curriculum. Originality/value Over the span of around 25 years, extensive research has been conducted to compare traditional teaching methods with innovative approaches. However, the results have not consistently shown that the innovative methods outperform their traditional counterparts. In response to this, the Accountamatics method has been developed, building upon the fundamental knowledge in accounting that has been used since 1494. Despite its historical significance, this method is sometimes regarded as limited to technical knowledge in the modern era.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于数学的学习方法及其对会计学导论学生成绩的影响:认知负荷理论
本研究旨在描述和检验以数学为基础的学习方法,称为Accountamatics(从数学的角度来看会计)的有效性。会计学方法植根于复式记账法和借方和贷方规则,这些原则最初是由数学教授Luca Pacioli在一本数学书中记录的。设计/方法/方法本研究采用准实验设计,跨越一个学期的时间,以检查其研究目标。与会者包括230名经AACSB认证的印尼经济与商业学院的学生。包括性别、专业和学习背景在内的控制变量也被考虑在内。数据分析采用线性回归检验,然后采用比较t检验。研究结果表明,与传统的学习方法相比,会计方法对学生的学习成绩有显著的积极影响。此外,分析表明,研究中检查的控制变量对学生的表现没有显著影响。由此可以推断,会计方法的实施对大学生的学习成绩产生了有益的影响。该研究结果为高等教育机构的教师提供了有价值的见解,突出了将数学为基础的教学纳入会计作为商科学生的替代方法的潜在好处。这些发现有助于现有的知识创新的教学方法,可以加强会计在商业课程的研究。在大约25年的时间里,人们进行了广泛的研究,比较传统的教学方法和创新的教学方法。然而,结果并没有一致地表明创新方法优于传统方法。为了应对这种情况,会计学方法已经发展起来,建立在自1494年以来一直使用的会计基本知识的基础上。尽管它具有历史意义,但在现代,这种方法有时被认为仅限于技术知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of International Education in Business
Journal of International Education in Business EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: The journal of International Education in Business (JIEB) is a peer reviewed journal concerned with theoretical and pedagogic aspects of international education in business schools and its flow-on implications for the workplace. The journal publishes papers that are concerned with: - international education, - cross- and inter-cultural aspects of internationalisation, - internationalisation of business schools, - business school teaching and learning, - academic and social engagement of students, - recruitment and marketing of business education in international contexts, - quality processes with respect to internationalisation, and - global organisations as stakeholders of internationalisation. Theoretical and empirical papers (qualitative and quantitative) as well as case analyses are invited. Papers that explore micro- and macro-perspectives in business and international education are also included.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing business education: neurodiversity informed faculty development practices Teaching and learning in business schools post-pandemic: a digital future Short-term study abroad (STSA): a review of key risks and challenges Faculty-Led Program: Food and Beverage Supply Chain – from the first mile to the last mile Project management education in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: a multi-method approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1