A comparison of conventional and accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy in definitive chemoradiation for locally advanced head and neck carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study

IF 1.8 Q3 ONCOLOGY Radiation Oncology Journal Pub Date : 2023-10-19 DOI:10.3857/roj.2023.00248
Arkaja Tripathy, Sandeep Muzumder, Nirmala Srikantia, Ajay Babu, MG John Sebastian, Avinash H. Udayashankar, Ganesha Dev Vashishta, John Michael Raj
{"title":"A comparison of conventional and accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy in definitive chemoradiation for locally advanced head and neck carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study","authors":"Arkaja Tripathy, Sandeep Muzumder, Nirmala Srikantia, Ajay Babu, MG John Sebastian, Avinash H. Udayashankar, Ganesha Dev Vashishta, John Michael Raj","doi":"10.3857/roj.2023.00248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose The study evaluates accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy (AHRT) compared to conventional fractionation radiotherapy (CFRT) in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC) receiving definitive chemoradiation therapy. Materials and Methods The study includes a retrospective cohort analysis of 120 patients. CFRT arm (n = 65) received 2 Gy per fraction to a dose of 70 Gy over 7 weeks in a three-volume approach, whereas the AHRT arm (n = 55) received 2.2 Gy per fraction to a dose of 66 Gy in 6 weeks with a two-volume approach. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Results With a median follow-up of 18.9 months, 23 patients died in the AHRT arm, and 45 deaths in the CFRT arm. The median OS was 23.4 and 37.63 months in the CFRT and AHRT arms, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.709; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.425–1.18; p = 0.189). The median time to loco-regional control was 33.3 months in the CFRT arm and was not reached in the patient group receiving AHRT (HR = 0.558; 95% CI, 0.30–1.03; p = 0.065). The median progression-free survival was 15.9 months in the CFRT arm and 26.9 months in the AFRT arm (HR = 0.801; 95% CI, 0.49–1.28; p = 0.357). Out of 11 acute toxic deaths, eight were in the CFRT arm. Conclusion The study showed a trend towards benefit in terms of locoregional control in the AHRT arm and similar OS. A longer follow-up of patients receiving AHRT is required to assess the benefit. Keywords: Radiotherapy, Altered fractionation, Survival, Locoregional neoplasm recurrence","PeriodicalId":46572,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Oncology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3857/roj.2023.00248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The study evaluates accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy (AHRT) compared to conventional fractionation radiotherapy (CFRT) in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC) receiving definitive chemoradiation therapy. Materials and Methods The study includes a retrospective cohort analysis of 120 patients. CFRT arm (n = 65) received 2 Gy per fraction to a dose of 70 Gy over 7 weeks in a three-volume approach, whereas the AHRT arm (n = 55) received 2.2 Gy per fraction to a dose of 66 Gy in 6 weeks with a two-volume approach. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Results With a median follow-up of 18.9 months, 23 patients died in the AHRT arm, and 45 deaths in the CFRT arm. The median OS was 23.4 and 37.63 months in the CFRT and AHRT arms, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.709; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.425–1.18; p = 0.189). The median time to loco-regional control was 33.3 months in the CFRT arm and was not reached in the patient group receiving AHRT (HR = 0.558; 95% CI, 0.30–1.03; p = 0.065). The median progression-free survival was 15.9 months in the CFRT arm and 26.9 months in the AFRT arm (HR = 0.801; 95% CI, 0.49–1.28; p = 0.357). Out of 11 acute toxic deaths, eight were in the CFRT arm. Conclusion The study showed a trend towards benefit in terms of locoregional control in the AHRT arm and similar OS. A longer follow-up of patients receiving AHRT is required to assess the benefit. Keywords: Radiotherapy, Altered fractionation, Survival, Locoregional neoplasm recurrence
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
传统和加速低分割放疗在局部晚期头颈部癌决定性放化疗中的比较:一项回顾性队列研究
目的:研究评估局部晚期头颈癌(LAHNC)患者接受最终放化疗时,加速低分割放疗(AHRT)与传统分割放疗(CFRT)的比较。材料与方法本研究对120例患者进行回顾性队列分析。CFRT组(n = 65)在7周内接受2 Gy /分数至70 Gy的剂量,采用三容积方法,而AHRT组(n = 55)在6周内接受2.2 Gy /分数至66 Gy的剂量,采用两容积方法。主要终点是总生存期(OS)。结果中位随访时间为18.9个月,AHRT组有23例患者死亡,CFRT组有45例死亡。CFRT组和AHRT组的中位OS分别为23.4和37.63个月(风险比[HR] = 0.709;95%置信区间[CI], 0.425 , 1.18;P = 0.189)。CFRT组达到局部-区域控制的中位时间为33.3个月,而接受AHRT的患者组没有达到局部-区域控制(HR = 0.558;95% ci, 0.30 1.03;P = 0.065)。中位无进展生存期在CFRT组为15.9个月,在AFRT组为26.9个月(HR = 0.801;95% ci, 0.49 1.28;P = 0.357)。在11例急性中毒死亡病例中,有8例发生在CFRT组。结论本研究显示,在AHRT组和类似OS中,在局部区域控制方面有获益的趋势。需要对接受AHRT的患者进行更长时间的随访以评估其益处。关键词:放疗,改变分割,生存,局部肿瘤复发
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Implementing high-dose rate surface mould brachytherapy for carcinoma of eyelid: a practical approach and weekly review The effects of high-dose radiation therapy on bone: a scoping review Validation of Combs prognostic scoring system in Indian recurrent glioma patients treated with re-radiation Long-term toxicities after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with or without total body irradiation: a population-based study in Korea Proton beam therapy as a promising option for high-risk limited stage small cell lung cancer: revealing potential of future novel agents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1