Safety and efficacy of anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation in cirrhotic patients

IF 35.6 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS European Heart Journal Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad655.548
J J Song, K Boulier, H Shang, N J Jackson, A Shetty, V Xia, H M Honda
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation in cirrhotic patients","authors":"J J Song, K Boulier, H Shang, N J Jackson, A Shetty, V Xia, H M Honda","doi":"10.1093/eurheartj/ehad655.548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent sustained arrhythmia and increases thromboembolism risk. AF is more prevalent in patients with cirrhosis and cirrhotics are at higher risk for ischemic stroke from thromboembolic mechanisms such as AF. Cirrhotics have complex pathophysiology of coagulation which can lead to bleeding diathesis or hypercoagulability. Cirrhotics have been excluded from major trials of anticoagulants (AC), thus there are currently no guidelines for AC in cirrhotics with AF. We aim to investigate how the incidence of ischemic stroke, major bleeding, hospitalizations, and mortality vary in patients with AF and cirrhosis between AC choices including no AC. Methods De-identified electronic health records from a U.S. health system between March 2013 and December 2022 were reviewed to identify patients with International Classification of Diseases (ICD) diagnoses of both AF and cirrhosis and who also had Creatinine, Bilirubin, and INR values within 6 months of their second diagnosis (either AF or cirrhosis). Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores were calculated from these values and patients were followed from the first date of their second diagnosis. Incidences of ICD-coded ischemic stroke, ICD-coded bleeds, Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) coded transfusions, all-cause mortality, and hospitalizations were recorded. Propensity score weighting between AC and non-AC groups balanced covariates (Table 1). Bivariate analyses for outcomes were conducted between AC and non-AC groups and among warfarin, DOAC, and injectable AC subgroups. Results 1,205 patients with AF and cirrhosis were included. 605 patients were prescribed AC (50.2%), 384 were prescribed DOACs (63.5%), 275 were prescribed Warfarin (45.4%), and 131 (21.7%) were prescribed injectable AC. After propensity weighting, patients prescribed AC had similar rates of bleed (p=0.607), transfusion (p=0.225), and death (p=0.779) but decreased rates of ischemic stroke (p=0.001) and number of hospitalizations (p<0.001) compared to non-AC patients. Patients prescribed DOACs had similar rates of bleed (p=0.529), ischemic stroke (p=0.108), number of hospitalizations (p=0.870), and death (p=0.230) but decreased rates of transfusion (p<0.001) compared to patients on other forms of AC. Patients prescribed warfarin had similar rates of death (p=0.230) and decreased rates of bleed (p=0.013) but increased rates of transfusion (p<0.001), ischemic stroke (p<0.001), and number of hospitalizations (p = 0.024) (Table 2). Conclusions Patients with AF and cirrhosis receiving AC experienced decreased rates of ischemic stroke and number of hospitalizations compared to patients who did not receive AC. Among AC subgroups, patients prescribed DOACs had lower rates of transfusion compared to other AC therapies while patients prescribed warfarin had increased rates of transfusion, ischemic stroke, and number of hospitalizations compared to other AC therapies.","PeriodicalId":11976,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":35.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad655.548","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent sustained arrhythmia and increases thromboembolism risk. AF is more prevalent in patients with cirrhosis and cirrhotics are at higher risk for ischemic stroke from thromboembolic mechanisms such as AF. Cirrhotics have complex pathophysiology of coagulation which can lead to bleeding diathesis or hypercoagulability. Cirrhotics have been excluded from major trials of anticoagulants (AC), thus there are currently no guidelines for AC in cirrhotics with AF. We aim to investigate how the incidence of ischemic stroke, major bleeding, hospitalizations, and mortality vary in patients with AF and cirrhosis between AC choices including no AC. Methods De-identified electronic health records from a U.S. health system between March 2013 and December 2022 were reviewed to identify patients with International Classification of Diseases (ICD) diagnoses of both AF and cirrhosis and who also had Creatinine, Bilirubin, and INR values within 6 months of their second diagnosis (either AF or cirrhosis). Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores were calculated from these values and patients were followed from the first date of their second diagnosis. Incidences of ICD-coded ischemic stroke, ICD-coded bleeds, Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) coded transfusions, all-cause mortality, and hospitalizations were recorded. Propensity score weighting between AC and non-AC groups balanced covariates (Table 1). Bivariate analyses for outcomes were conducted between AC and non-AC groups and among warfarin, DOAC, and injectable AC subgroups. Results 1,205 patients with AF and cirrhosis were included. 605 patients were prescribed AC (50.2%), 384 were prescribed DOACs (63.5%), 275 were prescribed Warfarin (45.4%), and 131 (21.7%) were prescribed injectable AC. After propensity weighting, patients prescribed AC had similar rates of bleed (p=0.607), transfusion (p=0.225), and death (p=0.779) but decreased rates of ischemic stroke (p=0.001) and number of hospitalizations (p<0.001) compared to non-AC patients. Patients prescribed DOACs had similar rates of bleed (p=0.529), ischemic stroke (p=0.108), number of hospitalizations (p=0.870), and death (p=0.230) but decreased rates of transfusion (p<0.001) compared to patients on other forms of AC. Patients prescribed warfarin had similar rates of death (p=0.230) and decreased rates of bleed (p=0.013) but increased rates of transfusion (p<0.001), ischemic stroke (p<0.001), and number of hospitalizations (p = 0.024) (Table 2). Conclusions Patients with AF and cirrhosis receiving AC experienced decreased rates of ischemic stroke and number of hospitalizations compared to patients who did not receive AC. Among AC subgroups, patients prescribed DOACs had lower rates of transfusion compared to other AC therapies while patients prescribed warfarin had increased rates of transfusion, ischemic stroke, and number of hospitalizations compared to other AC therapies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肝硬化心房颤动患者抗凝治疗的安全性和有效性
心房颤动(AF)是最常见的持续性心律失常,并增加血栓栓塞的风险。房颤在肝硬化患者中更为普遍,肝硬化患者因房颤等血栓栓塞机制而发生缺血性卒中的风险更高。肝硬化具有复杂的凝血病理生理,可导致出血性或高凝性。肝硬化已被排除在抗凝血剂(AC)的主要试验之外,因此目前尚无针对肝硬化合并房颤的抗凝血剂的指南。我们的目的是研究缺血性卒中、大出血、住院治疗、方法回顾2013年3月至2022年12月来自美国卫生系统的去识别电子健康记录,以识别国际疾病分类(ICD)诊断为房颤和肝硬化的患者,以及在第二次诊断(房颤或肝硬化)后6个月内有肌酐、胆红素和INR值的患者。根据这些值计算终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分,并从患者第二次诊断的第一天起对其进行随访。记录了icd编码的缺血性卒中、icd编码的出血、当前程序术语(CPT)编码的输血、全因死亡率和住院率。AC组和非AC组之间的倾向评分加权平衡了协变量(表1)。AC组和非AC组之间以及华法林、DOAC和注射AC亚组之间的结果进行了双变量分析。结果纳入房颤合并肝硬化患者1205例。605例患者服用AC(50.2%), 384例患者服用doac(63.5%), 275例患者服用华法林(45.4%),131例患者服用注射AC(21.7%)。倾向加权后,服用AC的患者出血(p=0.607)、输血(p=0.225)和死亡(p=0.779)的发生率相似,但缺血性卒中的发生率(p=0.001)和住院次数(p<0.001)较未服用AC的患者有所降低。服用doac的患者出血(p=0.529)、缺血性卒中(p=0.108)、住院次数(p=0.870)和死亡率(p=0.230)相似,但与服用其他形式AC的患者相比,输血率(p=0.230)降低(p=0.013)。服用华法林的患者死亡率相似(p=0.230),出血率降低(p=0.013),但输血率(p amp;lt;0.001)、缺血性卒中(p amp;lt;0.001)增加。结论:与未接受AC治疗的患者相比,接受AC治疗的房颤和肝硬化患者缺血性卒中发生率和住院次数降低。在AC亚组中,与其他AC治疗相比,使用doac治疗的患者输血率较低,而使用华法林治疗的患者输血率、缺血性卒中发生率和住院次数较其他AC治疗增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Heart Journal
European Heart Journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
39.30
自引率
6.90%
发文量
3942
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The European Heart Journal is a renowned international journal that focuses on cardiovascular medicine. It is published weekly and is the official journal of the European Society of Cardiology. This peer-reviewed journal is committed to publishing high-quality clinical and scientific material pertaining to all aspects of cardiovascular medicine. It covers a diverse range of topics including research findings, technical evaluations, and reviews. Moreover, the journal serves as a platform for the exchange of information and discussions on various aspects of cardiovascular medicine, including educational matters. In addition to original papers on cardiovascular medicine and surgery, the European Heart Journal also presents reviews, clinical perspectives, ESC Guidelines, and editorial articles that highlight recent advancements in cardiology. Additionally, the journal actively encourages readers to share their thoughts and opinions through correspondence.
期刊最新文献
New-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation management and outcomes: the VISION Cardiac Surgery cohort. Perioperative dapagliflozin in diabetic patients undergoing cardiac surgery: the DAPA-CS trial. Post-operative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: reversible, provoked, or predictive? Time to reframe a persistent challenge. Weekly Journal Scan: Aldosterone synthase inhibition with baxdrostat improves 24-hour blood pressure control in patients with treatment resistant hypertension. Correction to: Balloon pericardiotomy for malignant pericardial effusion: the PMAP trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1