Social solidarity with Ukrainian and Syrian refugees in the twitter discourse. A comparison between 2015 and 2022

IF 2.3 1区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY European Societies Pub Date : 2023-11-06 DOI:10.1080/14616696.2023.2275604
Maximilian Weber, Daniela Grunow, Yanran Chen, Steffen Eger
{"title":"Social solidarity with Ukrainian and Syrian refugees in the twitter discourse. A comparison between 2015 and 2022","authors":"Maximilian Weber, Daniela Grunow, Yanran Chen, Steffen Eger","doi":"10.1080/14616696.2023.2275604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTIncoming refugees from Ukraine are currently encountering a wave of solidarity that is seen, according to some, in stark contrast to the solidarity experienced by earlier groups of refugees i.e. from Syria during the so-called ‘immigration crisis’ in 2015. We aim to inform this debate on solidarity bias by collecting and analyzing quantitative data on (anti-)solidarity statements posted on Twitter during both waves of refugee immigration. We assess how social solidarity towards refugees differed between 2015 and the current wave of refugees fleeing Ukraine. To this end, we collect and analyze a longitudinal dataset of refugee-related tweets selected via hashtags and covering the period between January 2015 and August 2022. We first annotate the tweets for (anti-)solidarity expressions towards refugees. On these annotations, we train a supervised machine learning model and use it to automatically label over 2.3 million tweets. We assess the automatically labeled data for how statements related to refugee (anti-)solidarity developed and differed for distinct groups of refugees. Our findings show that in relative terms, refugee solidarity was expressed more often in tweets during September 2015 compared to March 2022. However, we find some evidence of solidarity bias in March 2022.KEYWORDS: Social solidaritycrisesrefugeesNatural Language Processing AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to thank the participants of the ConTrust lunch seminar 04–2022, the participants of the Workshop ‘The Comparative Politics of Solidarity’, held at Politicologenetmaal 2023 in Leuven, Belgium, and anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments on earlier drafts of this paper.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Replication filesThe Python code for data cleaning and analysis is available at https://zenodo.org/record/8232678.Additional informationFundingDaniela Grunow would like to acknowledge funding from the German Research Foundation (FOR 5173, no. 439346934) and the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (funding code 01UG2114). Steffen Eger gratefully acknowledges support from the German Research Foundation (Heisenberg grant EG 375/5–1). Steffen Eger's NLLG group is further supported by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research via the grant “Metrics4NLG”.","PeriodicalId":47392,"journal":{"name":"European Societies","volume":"41 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Societies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2023.2275604","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTIncoming refugees from Ukraine are currently encountering a wave of solidarity that is seen, according to some, in stark contrast to the solidarity experienced by earlier groups of refugees i.e. from Syria during the so-called ‘immigration crisis’ in 2015. We aim to inform this debate on solidarity bias by collecting and analyzing quantitative data on (anti-)solidarity statements posted on Twitter during both waves of refugee immigration. We assess how social solidarity towards refugees differed between 2015 and the current wave of refugees fleeing Ukraine. To this end, we collect and analyze a longitudinal dataset of refugee-related tweets selected via hashtags and covering the period between January 2015 and August 2022. We first annotate the tweets for (anti-)solidarity expressions towards refugees. On these annotations, we train a supervised machine learning model and use it to automatically label over 2.3 million tweets. We assess the automatically labeled data for how statements related to refugee (anti-)solidarity developed and differed for distinct groups of refugees. Our findings show that in relative terms, refugee solidarity was expressed more often in tweets during September 2015 compared to March 2022. However, we find some evidence of solidarity bias in March 2022.KEYWORDS: Social solidaritycrisesrefugeesNatural Language Processing AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to thank the participants of the ConTrust lunch seminar 04–2022, the participants of the Workshop ‘The Comparative Politics of Solidarity’, held at Politicologenetmaal 2023 in Leuven, Belgium, and anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments on earlier drafts of this paper.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Replication filesThe Python code for data cleaning and analysis is available at https://zenodo.org/record/8232678.Additional informationFundingDaniela Grunow would like to acknowledge funding from the German Research Foundation (FOR 5173, no. 439346934) and the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (funding code 01UG2114). Steffen Eger gratefully acknowledges support from the German Research Foundation (Heisenberg grant EG 375/5–1). Steffen Eger's NLLG group is further supported by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research via the grant “Metrics4NLG”.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在推特上,乌克兰和叙利亚难民得到了社会的声援。2015年和2022年的对比
来自乌克兰的难民目前正遭遇一波团结的浪潮,根据一些人的说法,这与2015年所谓的“移民危机”期间来自叙利亚的早期难民群体所经历的团结形成鲜明对比。我们的目标是通过收集和分析两波难民移民期间Twitter上发布的(反)团结声明的定量数据,为这场关于团结偏见的辩论提供信息。我们评估了2015年和当前逃离乌克兰的难民潮之间,社会对难民的团结有何不同。为此,我们收集并分析了一个纵向数据集,其中包括2015年1月至2022年8月期间通过标签选择的与难民相关的推文。我们首先在推特上注释(反)声援难民的表达。在这些注释上,我们训练了一个有监督的机器学习模型,并用它来自动标记超过230万条推文。我们对自动标记的数据进行评估,以了解与难民(反)团结有关的陈述如何在不同的难民群体中发展和不同。我们的研究结果表明,相对而言,与2022年3月相比,2015年9月期间,难民团结在推特上的表达频率更高。然而,我们在2022年3月发现了一些团结偏见的证据。作者要感谢4 - 2022年“社会团结”午餐研讨会的参与者,在比利时鲁汶举行的“团结的比较政治”研讨会的参与者,以及匿名审稿人对本文早期草稿的建设性意见。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。复制文件用于数据清理和分析的Python代码可在https://zenodo.org/record/8232678.Additional informationFundingDaniela Grunow感谢德国研究基金会的资助(for 5173, no。439346934)和联邦教育与研究部(资助代码01UG2114)。Steffen Eger感谢德国研究基金会(Heisenberg grant EG 375/5-1)的支持。Steffen Eger的NLLG小组通过“Metrics4NLG”拨款得到了联邦教育和研究部的进一步支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Societies
European Societies SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
1.20%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: European Societies, the flagship journal of the European Sociological Association, aims to promote and share sociological research related to Europe. As a generalist sociology journal, we welcome research from all areas of sociology. However, we have a specific focus on addressing the socio-economic and socio-political challenges faced by European societies, as well as exploring all aspects of European social life and socioculture. Our journal is committed to upholding ethical standards and academic independence. We conduct a rigorous and anonymous review process for all submitted manuscripts. This ensures the quality and integrity of the research we publish. European Societies encourages a plurality of perspectives within the sociology discipline. We embrace a wide range of sociological methods and theoretical approaches. Furthermore, we are open to articles that adopt a historical perspective and engage in comparative research involving Europe as a whole or specific European countries. We also appreciate comparative studies that include societies beyond Europe. In summary, European Societies is dedicated to promoting sociological research with a focus on European societies. We welcome diverse methodological and theoretical approaches, historical perspectives, and comparative studies involving Europe and other societies.
期刊最新文献
Settling into uncertainty and risk amidst the COVID-19 pandemic and the war in Ukraine Gender compositions of occupations and firms jointly shape switches from gender-atypical towards more gender-typical positions The effect of the month of birth on academic achievement: heterogeneity by social origin and gender Do they think that joy and misery are temporary? Comparing trajectories of current and predicted life satisfaction across life events Narrowing inequalities through redistribution. A relational inequality approach to female managers and the gender wage gap
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1