Maximilian Weber, Daniela Grunow, Yanran Chen, Steffen Eger
{"title":"Social solidarity with Ukrainian and Syrian refugees in the twitter discourse. A comparison between 2015 and 2022","authors":"Maximilian Weber, Daniela Grunow, Yanran Chen, Steffen Eger","doi":"10.1080/14616696.2023.2275604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTIncoming refugees from Ukraine are currently encountering a wave of solidarity that is seen, according to some, in stark contrast to the solidarity experienced by earlier groups of refugees i.e. from Syria during the so-called ‘immigration crisis’ in 2015. We aim to inform this debate on solidarity bias by collecting and analyzing quantitative data on (anti-)solidarity statements posted on Twitter during both waves of refugee immigration. We assess how social solidarity towards refugees differed between 2015 and the current wave of refugees fleeing Ukraine. To this end, we collect and analyze a longitudinal dataset of refugee-related tweets selected via hashtags and covering the period between January 2015 and August 2022. We first annotate the tweets for (anti-)solidarity expressions towards refugees. On these annotations, we train a supervised machine learning model and use it to automatically label over 2.3 million tweets. We assess the automatically labeled data for how statements related to refugee (anti-)solidarity developed and differed for distinct groups of refugees. Our findings show that in relative terms, refugee solidarity was expressed more often in tweets during September 2015 compared to March 2022. However, we find some evidence of solidarity bias in March 2022.KEYWORDS: Social solidaritycrisesrefugeesNatural Language Processing AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to thank the participants of the ConTrust lunch seminar 04–2022, the participants of the Workshop ‘The Comparative Politics of Solidarity’, held at Politicologenetmaal 2023 in Leuven, Belgium, and anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments on earlier drafts of this paper.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Replication filesThe Python code for data cleaning and analysis is available at https://zenodo.org/record/8232678.Additional informationFundingDaniela Grunow would like to acknowledge funding from the German Research Foundation (FOR 5173, no. 439346934) and the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (funding code 01UG2114). Steffen Eger gratefully acknowledges support from the German Research Foundation (Heisenberg grant EG 375/5–1). Steffen Eger's NLLG group is further supported by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research via the grant “Metrics4NLG”.","PeriodicalId":47392,"journal":{"name":"European Societies","volume":"41 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Societies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2023.2275604","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACTIncoming refugees from Ukraine are currently encountering a wave of solidarity that is seen, according to some, in stark contrast to the solidarity experienced by earlier groups of refugees i.e. from Syria during the so-called ‘immigration crisis’ in 2015. We aim to inform this debate on solidarity bias by collecting and analyzing quantitative data on (anti-)solidarity statements posted on Twitter during both waves of refugee immigration. We assess how social solidarity towards refugees differed between 2015 and the current wave of refugees fleeing Ukraine. To this end, we collect and analyze a longitudinal dataset of refugee-related tweets selected via hashtags and covering the period between January 2015 and August 2022. We first annotate the tweets for (anti-)solidarity expressions towards refugees. On these annotations, we train a supervised machine learning model and use it to automatically label over 2.3 million tweets. We assess the automatically labeled data for how statements related to refugee (anti-)solidarity developed and differed for distinct groups of refugees. Our findings show that in relative terms, refugee solidarity was expressed more often in tweets during September 2015 compared to March 2022. However, we find some evidence of solidarity bias in March 2022.KEYWORDS: Social solidaritycrisesrefugeesNatural Language Processing AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to thank the participants of the ConTrust lunch seminar 04–2022, the participants of the Workshop ‘The Comparative Politics of Solidarity’, held at Politicologenetmaal 2023 in Leuven, Belgium, and anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments on earlier drafts of this paper.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Replication filesThe Python code for data cleaning and analysis is available at https://zenodo.org/record/8232678.Additional informationFundingDaniela Grunow would like to acknowledge funding from the German Research Foundation (FOR 5173, no. 439346934) and the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (funding code 01UG2114). Steffen Eger gratefully acknowledges support from the German Research Foundation (Heisenberg grant EG 375/5–1). Steffen Eger's NLLG group is further supported by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research via the grant “Metrics4NLG”.
期刊介绍:
European Societies, the flagship journal of the European Sociological Association, aims to promote and share sociological research related to Europe. As a generalist sociology journal, we welcome research from all areas of sociology. However, we have a specific focus on addressing the socio-economic and socio-political challenges faced by European societies, as well as exploring all aspects of European social life and socioculture.
Our journal is committed to upholding ethical standards and academic independence. We conduct a rigorous and anonymous review process for all submitted manuscripts. This ensures the quality and integrity of the research we publish.
European Societies encourages a plurality of perspectives within the sociology discipline. We embrace a wide range of sociological methods and theoretical approaches. Furthermore, we are open to articles that adopt a historical perspective and engage in comparative research involving Europe as a whole or specific European countries. We also appreciate comparative studies that include societies beyond Europe.
In summary, European Societies is dedicated to promoting sociological research with a focus on European societies. We welcome diverse methodological and theoretical approaches, historical perspectives, and comparative studies involving Europe and other societies.