Enterococcal Infections: A Comparative Analysis between the Pandemic and the Pre-pandemic Period

Neha Sharad, Smriti Srivastava, Vandana V Kiro, Sharin Varma, Sharad Srivastav, Aparna Ningombam, Rajesh Malhotra, Purva Mathur
{"title":"Enterococcal Infections: A Comparative Analysis between the Pandemic and the Pre-pandemic Period","authors":"Neha Sharad, Smriti Srivastava, Vandana V Kiro, Sharin Varma, Sharad Srivastav, Aparna Ningombam, Rajesh Malhotra, Purva Mathur","doi":"10.2174/0126667975266889231102063923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: During the COVID-19 pandemic, higher Enterococcus bloodstream infections (BSI) rates have been reported. To establish whether these infections actually increased, we compared the incidence of Enterococcal infections before (September 2019 to February 2020) and during the pandemic (April 2020 to March 2022). Materials and Methods: This retrospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary care center converted into a COVID-19 facility. All clinical samples received in our laboratory during the study period were included. Results: In the six months preceding the pandemic, 2,243 samples were positive for bacterial growth; of the isolated organisms, 100 were Enterococcus species. During the pandemic, 39 out of 996 positive samples were Enterococcus. E. faecium was the most common isolate, 79/99 and 37/39. BSI was the most common overall infection (554/996; 55.6%) compared to the period before it (287/2243; 12.79%). Enterococcus species accounted for 30 out of 554 (5.41%) BSI in COVID-19 patients and 21/287 in the period before it (7.31%). Ten out of 39 (25.64%) isolates were vancomycin-resistant compared to the pre-COVID-19 period (9/21; 42.8%). There was an increase in antimicrobial resistance in the pandemic, except for linezolid and high-level aminoglycoside. Conclusion: Although we noted a higher percentage of BSIs, Enterococci were isolated from a lesser rate of COVID-19 patients from our center compared to pre-pandemic times. The plausible reasons for this could be the protective gut microbiota in the Indian population, and no increase in Enterococcus species in the environment of patients.","PeriodicalId":10815,"journal":{"name":"Coronaviruses","volume":"67 S1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coronaviruses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0126667975266889231102063923","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: During the COVID-19 pandemic, higher Enterococcus bloodstream infections (BSI) rates have been reported. To establish whether these infections actually increased, we compared the incidence of Enterococcal infections before (September 2019 to February 2020) and during the pandemic (April 2020 to March 2022). Materials and Methods: This retrospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary care center converted into a COVID-19 facility. All clinical samples received in our laboratory during the study period were included. Results: In the six months preceding the pandemic, 2,243 samples were positive for bacterial growth; of the isolated organisms, 100 were Enterococcus species. During the pandemic, 39 out of 996 positive samples were Enterococcus. E. faecium was the most common isolate, 79/99 and 37/39. BSI was the most common overall infection (554/996; 55.6%) compared to the period before it (287/2243; 12.79%). Enterococcus species accounted for 30 out of 554 (5.41%) BSI in COVID-19 patients and 21/287 in the period before it (7.31%). Ten out of 39 (25.64%) isolates were vancomycin-resistant compared to the pre-COVID-19 period (9/21; 42.8%). There was an increase in antimicrobial resistance in the pandemic, except for linezolid and high-level aminoglycoside. Conclusion: Although we noted a higher percentage of BSIs, Enterococci were isolated from a lesser rate of COVID-19 patients from our center compared to pre-pandemic times. The plausible reasons for this could be the protective gut microbiota in the Indian population, and no increase in Enterococcus species in the environment of patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肠球菌感染:大流行与大流行前时期的比较分析
导言:在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,有报道称血液肠球菌感染(BSI)率较高。为了确定这些感染是否真的增加了,我们比较了大流行之前(2019年9月至2020年2月)和期间(2020年4月至2022年3月)肠球菌感染的发病率。材料和方法:本回顾性观察性研究在由三级保健中心改建的COVID-19设施中进行。纳入研究期间在本实验室收到的所有临床样本。结果:大流行前6个月,2243份样本细菌生长呈阳性;其中肠球菌100种。在流感大流行期间,996个阳性样本中有39个是肠球菌。粪肠杆菌是最常见的分离菌,分别为79/99和37/39。BSI是最常见的整体感染(554/996;55.6%),与前一时期相比(287/2243;12.79%)。在新冠肺炎患者的554个BSI中,肠球菌占30个(5.41%),而在新冠肺炎之前,肠球菌占21个(7.31%)。与covid -19前相比,39株中有10株(25.64%)对万古霉素耐药(9/21;42.8%)。除利奈唑胺和高水平氨基糖苷外,大流行中抗菌素耐药性有所增加。结论:虽然我们注意到bsi的比例较高,但与大流行前相比,我们中心的COVID-19患者中分离到肠球菌的比例较低。这种现象的合理原因可能是印度人群中的保护性肠道微生物群,以及患者环境中肠球菌种类没有增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness on the Severity of Disease: A Case-control Study in Southeastern Iran Evaluation of Influenza Vaccination Coverage Among Healthcare Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Analysis of Motivating and Hindering Factors Novel Coronavirus: An Overview of the History, Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management of the Pandemic COVID-19 Catastrophe, with Special Emphasis on Herbal Treatment Alternatives Spectrum of Long COVID Symptoms and Management Approaches in Europe and Latin America Identification of Epitope Against Omicron Variant of SARS-CoV-2: In Silico Vaccine Design Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1