Rescuing the liberal international order: crisis, resilience and EU security policy

IF 3.9 1区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS International Affairs Pub Date : 2023-11-06 DOI:10.1093/ia/iiad222
Pol Bargués, Jonathan Joseph, Ana E Juncos
{"title":"Rescuing the liberal international order: crisis, resilience and EU security policy","authors":"Pol Bargués, Jonathan Joseph, Ana E Juncos","doi":"10.1093/ia/iiad222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article reflects on how European Union (EU) narratives of the crisis of the liberal international order (LIO) have reshaped its resilience approach and its foreign and security policy more broadly. Drawing on qualitative textual analysis, we trace the evolution of the EU's resilience approach over time and the way it has been shaped by crisis narratives. While the idea of resilience was introduced in EU foreign policy to foster the resilience of crisis-affected societies from the bottom up, the perception of an increasingly contested world first led to a reinterpretation of resilience in pragmatic ways, with values and interests combined selectively to protect the rules-based international order. More recently, on the grounds of a worsening crisis of the LIO, resilience has taken a defensive turn, adopting a more geopolitical stance to strengthen the EU's own resilience and that of the LIO. We argue that EU crisis narratives about the LIO thus serve to sustain and to rescue it. Furthermore, we conclude that the defensive reinterpretation of resilience is eroding the normative character of EU foreign and security policy. It also challenges the persistence of the LIO in the long term.","PeriodicalId":48162,"journal":{"name":"International Affairs","volume":"23 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiad222","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This article reflects on how European Union (EU) narratives of the crisis of the liberal international order (LIO) have reshaped its resilience approach and its foreign and security policy more broadly. Drawing on qualitative textual analysis, we trace the evolution of the EU's resilience approach over time and the way it has been shaped by crisis narratives. While the idea of resilience was introduced in EU foreign policy to foster the resilience of crisis-affected societies from the bottom up, the perception of an increasingly contested world first led to a reinterpretation of resilience in pragmatic ways, with values and interests combined selectively to protect the rules-based international order. More recently, on the grounds of a worsening crisis of the LIO, resilience has taken a defensive turn, adopting a more geopolitical stance to strengthen the EU's own resilience and that of the LIO. We argue that EU crisis narratives about the LIO thus serve to sustain and to rescue it. Furthermore, we conclude that the defensive reinterpretation of resilience is eroding the normative character of EU foreign and security policy. It also challenges the persistence of the LIO in the long term.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拯救自由国际秩序:危机、韧性与欧盟安全政策
摘要本文反思了欧盟(EU)关于自由国际秩序(LIO)危机的叙述如何在更广泛的范围内重塑了其弹性方法及其外交和安全政策。通过定性文本分析,我们追溯了欧盟弹性方法随时间的演变,以及危机叙事对其形成的方式。虽然欧盟在外交政策中引入弹性的概念是为了自下而上地培养受危机影响的社会的弹性,但对世界竞争日益激烈的看法首先导致了以务实的方式重新解释弹性,将价值观和利益选择性地结合起来,以保护基于规则的国际秩序。最近,在imf危机恶化的基础上,弹性转向了防御,采取了更具地缘政治色彩的立场,以加强欧盟自身和imf的弹性。因此,我们认为,欧盟关于LIO的危机叙述有助于维持和拯救它。此外,我们得出结论,对弹性的防御性重新解释正在侵蚀欧盟外交和安全政策的规范性。从长远来看,这也对LIO的持久性提出了挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Affairs
International Affairs INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
24.40%
发文量
255
期刊介绍: International Affairs is Britain"s leading journal of international relations. Founded by and edited at Chatham House, the Royal Institute of International Affairs in London, it has not only developed a much valued insight into European policy debates but has also become renowned for its coverage of global policy issues. Mixing commissioned and unsolicited articles from the biggest names in international relations this lively, provocative journal will keep you up-to-date with critical thinking on the key issues shaping world economic and political change.
期刊最新文献
Alicia Moreau's socialist feminism on war: transcending western narratives? ASEAN, Russia's invasion of Ukraine and the politics of pragmatism The ethics of engaged scholarship in a complex world The Oxford handbook of history and international relations Alva Myrdal: a pioneer in nuclear disarmament
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1