European public opinion: united in supporting Ukraine, divided on the future of NATO

IF 3.9 1区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS International Affairs Pub Date : 2023-11-06 DOI:10.1093/ia/iiad241
Catarina Thomson, Matthias Mader, Felix Münchow, Jason Reifler, Harald Schoen
{"title":"European public opinion: united in supporting Ukraine, divided on the future of NATO","authors":"Catarina Thomson, Matthias Mader, Felix Münchow, Jason Reifler, Harald Schoen","doi":"10.1093/ia/iiad241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract • How strong is public support for Ukraine in Europe? Given reports that Russian President Vladimir Putin may be ‘playing for time’ in the hopes that weary publics will demand an end to supporting Ukraine, this is an important question. • In February 2023, we conducted a survey of public attitudes in ten major European countries: France, Germany, the United Kingdom, Estonia, Hungary, Poland, Finland, Sweden, Italy and Spain. • Our findings suggest that Europeans are (almost) unanimous in blaming Russia for the war and strongly in favour of standing by Ukraine in its war effort. • Only minorities of respondents are of the opinion that Ukraine should be urged to accept territorial losses that could help end the war, or that economic sanctions against Russia should be lifted. Even in countries where support for Ukraine is lower (Hungary and Italy), or among more sceptical groups, we typically find a majority or plurality on Ukraine's side (or, at worst, we find only a small majority are pro-Russia). • Regarding NATO, there is no widespread appetite for increasing its presence in eastern Europe (except in Poland and Estonia), and even less support for Ukraine joining the alliance. At least in the eyes of the public, fighting a war in Ukraine is perceived as a goal in itself that does not necessarily elicit broader changes to existing security alliances like NATO. • Looking ahead, if the gap between the expectations audiences had for the Ukrainian counter-offensive and what it actually delivers is too great, we would expect public support for Ukraine in the conflict to weaken overall. • If governments wish to keep support levels high, we recommend targeting communications to reach groups we have found to be less supportive. This could include utilizing non-traditional media platforms to reach younger audiences, or members of populist right-wing groups.","PeriodicalId":48162,"journal":{"name":"International Affairs","volume":"21 12","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiad241","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract • How strong is public support for Ukraine in Europe? Given reports that Russian President Vladimir Putin may be ‘playing for time’ in the hopes that weary publics will demand an end to supporting Ukraine, this is an important question. • In February 2023, we conducted a survey of public attitudes in ten major European countries: France, Germany, the United Kingdom, Estonia, Hungary, Poland, Finland, Sweden, Italy and Spain. • Our findings suggest that Europeans are (almost) unanimous in blaming Russia for the war and strongly in favour of standing by Ukraine in its war effort. • Only minorities of respondents are of the opinion that Ukraine should be urged to accept territorial losses that could help end the war, or that economic sanctions against Russia should be lifted. Even in countries where support for Ukraine is lower (Hungary and Italy), or among more sceptical groups, we typically find a majority or plurality on Ukraine's side (or, at worst, we find only a small majority are pro-Russia). • Regarding NATO, there is no widespread appetite for increasing its presence in eastern Europe (except in Poland and Estonia), and even less support for Ukraine joining the alliance. At least in the eyes of the public, fighting a war in Ukraine is perceived as a goal in itself that does not necessarily elicit broader changes to existing security alliances like NATO. • Looking ahead, if the gap between the expectations audiences had for the Ukrainian counter-offensive and what it actually delivers is too great, we would expect public support for Ukraine in the conflict to weaken overall. • If governments wish to keep support levels high, we recommend targeting communications to reach groups we have found to be less supportive. This could include utilizing non-traditional media platforms to reach younger audiences, or members of populist right-wing groups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲舆论:一致支持乌克兰,对北约的未来看法不一
•乌克兰在欧洲的公众支持率有多高?有报道称,俄罗斯总统普京(Vladimir Putin)可能是在“拖延时间”,希望厌倦的公众会要求停止支持乌克兰,有鉴于此,这是一个重要的问题。•2023年2月,我们在十个主要欧洲国家进行了公众态度调查:法国、德国、英国、爱沙尼亚、匈牙利、波兰、芬兰、瑞典、意大利和西班牙。•我们的调查结果表明,欧洲人(几乎)一致将战争归咎于俄罗斯,并强烈支持乌克兰的战争努力。•只有少数受访者认为,应该敦促乌克兰接受可能有助于结束战争的领土损失,或者应该取消对俄罗斯的经济制裁。即使在对乌克兰的支持率较低的国家(匈牙利和意大利),或者在更持怀疑态度的群体中,我们通常也会发现大多数人或多数人站在乌克兰一边(或者,最坏的情况是,我们发现只有一小部分人是亲俄罗斯的)。•关于北约(NATO),人们对增加其在东欧的存在(除了波兰和爱沙尼亚)没有普遍的兴趣,对乌克兰加入该联盟的支持就更少了。至少在公众眼中,在乌克兰开战本身被视为一个目标,并不一定会引发北约(NATO)等现有安全联盟发生更广泛的变化。•展望未来,如果观众对乌克兰反攻的期望与实际效果之间的差距太大,我们预计公众在冲突中对乌克兰的支持将整体减弱。•如果政府希望保持较高的支持水平,我们建议针对我们发现支持度较低的群体进行有针对性的沟通。这可能包括利用非传统媒体平台来接触更年轻的受众,或民粹主义右翼团体的成员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Affairs
International Affairs INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
24.40%
发文量
255
期刊介绍: International Affairs is Britain"s leading journal of international relations. Founded by and edited at Chatham House, the Royal Institute of International Affairs in London, it has not only developed a much valued insight into European policy debates but has also become renowned for its coverage of global policy issues. Mixing commissioned and unsolicited articles from the biggest names in international relations this lively, provocative journal will keep you up-to-date with critical thinking on the key issues shaping world economic and political change.
期刊最新文献
Alicia Moreau's socialist feminism on war: transcending western narratives? ASEAN, Russia's invasion of Ukraine and the politics of pragmatism The ethics of engaged scholarship in a complex world The Oxford handbook of history and international relations Alva Myrdal: a pioneer in nuclear disarmament
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1