#35908 Cerebrospinal fluid lavage for inadvertent intrathecal inyections. An option to be considered

Silvia De Miguel Manso, Carlota Gordaliza Pastor, Rocío Gutiérrez Bustillo, Beatriz Martínez Rafael
{"title":"#35908 Cerebrospinal fluid lavage for inadvertent intrathecal inyections. An option to be considered","authors":"Silvia De Miguel Manso, Carlota Gordaliza Pastor, Rocío Gutiérrez Bustillo, Beatriz Martínez Rafael","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2023-esra.443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3></h3> <b>Please confirm that an ethics committee approval has been applied for or granted:</b> Not relevant (see information at the bottom of this page) <h3>Background and Aims</h3> Intrathecal administration of wrong drugs (IAWD) can have catastrophic consequences. Reported IAWD in literature are mainly individual cases or small case-series reports. In most of them cerebral spinal fluid lavage (CSFL) seems to be a choice of management, added to support measures. The aim of this work is to know if CSFL could be considered as a safe and effective treatment in case of IAWD. <h3>Methods</h3> The author searched published reports of IAWD using Pubmed database from January 2017 to January 2023. Those in which CSFL was used as a treatment were selected. The main study founded was a review article that identifyed potential sources of IAWD and its appropriate management. Other studies described individual cases of IAWD managed with CSFL. <h3>Results</h3> Immediate CSFL is related to good outcomes in many of the studies reviewed. It involves CSF aspiration with a spinal catheter or a needle at the volume of 10–20 ml each time and replaced with an equal volume of normal saline, so the drug is diluted and removed. It´s usually make in emergency situations so it´s difficult to perform a propper randomized clinical trial evaluation. Maybe that’s why it is not considered as a standard treatment for IAWD. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Despite of the lack of studies published, early CSFL should be considered, in addition to supportive and symptomatic treatment, especially if life- threatening consecuences are anticipated. It is needed to balance the risks and benefits case-by-case before using CSFL, but does not seem to have major complications in an emergency situation.","PeriodicalId":80519,"journal":{"name":"Archaeologia aeliana, or, Miscellaneous tracts relating to antiquity","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeologia aeliana, or, Miscellaneous tracts relating to antiquity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2023-esra.443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Please confirm that an ethics committee approval has been applied for or granted: Not relevant (see information at the bottom of this page)

Background and Aims

Intrathecal administration of wrong drugs (IAWD) can have catastrophic consequences. Reported IAWD in literature are mainly individual cases or small case-series reports. In most of them cerebral spinal fluid lavage (CSFL) seems to be a choice of management, added to support measures. The aim of this work is to know if CSFL could be considered as a safe and effective treatment in case of IAWD.

Methods

The author searched published reports of IAWD using Pubmed database from January 2017 to January 2023. Those in which CSFL was used as a treatment were selected. The main study founded was a review article that identifyed potential sources of IAWD and its appropriate management. Other studies described individual cases of IAWD managed with CSFL.

Results

Immediate CSFL is related to good outcomes in many of the studies reviewed. It involves CSF aspiration with a spinal catheter or a needle at the volume of 10–20 ml each time and replaced with an equal volume of normal saline, so the drug is diluted and removed. It´s usually make in emergency situations so it´s difficult to perform a propper randomized clinical trial evaluation. Maybe that’s why it is not considered as a standard treatment for IAWD.

Conclusions

Despite of the lack of studies published, early CSFL should be considered, in addition to supportive and symptomatic treatment, especially if life- threatening consecuences are anticipated. It is needed to balance the risks and benefits case-by-case before using CSFL, but does not seem to have major complications in an emergency situation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
#35908因意外鞘内注射而进行脑脊液灌洗。一个可以考虑的选择
请确认已申请或批准伦理委员会批准:不相关(见本页底部的信息)背景和目的鞘内给药错误(IAWD)可能会造成灾难性后果。文献报道的IAWD主要是个案或小病例系列报道。在大多数情况下,脑脊液灌洗(CSFL)似乎是一种选择的管理,加上支持措施。这项工作的目的是了解CSFL是否可以被认为是一种安全有效的治疗IAWD的方法。方法利用Pubmed数据库检索2017年1月至2023年1月已发表的IAWD报告。选择使用CSFL作为治疗的病例。建立的主要研究是一篇综述文章,该文章确定了IAWD的潜在来源及其适当管理。其他研究描述了用CSFL治疗IAWD的个别病例。结果在许多研究中,即时CSFL与良好的结果有关。每次用脊髓导管或针抽吸10 - 20ml的脑脊液,用等量生理盐水代替,将药物稀释后取出。它通常是在紧急情况下进行的,因此很难进行适当的随机临床试验评估。也许这就是为什么它不被认为是IAWD的标准治疗方法。结论:尽管缺乏相关研究发表,但除了支持和对症治疗外,早期CSFL应该被考虑,特别是如果预期会发生危及生命的后果。在使用CSFL之前,需要逐个权衡风险和益处,但在紧急情况下似乎不会产生重大并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
#35807 Erector spinae block for percutaneous kyphoplasty anesthetic management in high-risk patients: a case report #35918 A randomized control trial to evaluate the effects of Ketofol versus propofol on cerebral oxygenation in patients undergoing Trans-sphenoidal pituitary surgery under total intravenous anesthesia #35931 Regional anaesthesia for intubation and maintenance in myasthenia gravis patient with bilateral renal calculi #34666 Case report: Ablation of renal tumour in high bmi patient under single shot paravertebral and remifentanil #35938 Venovenous ECMO in near fatal ashtma: case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1