#36260 Machine learning to predict postoperative pain and opioid outcomes: promise or pitfall?

Julia Frederica Reichel, Haoyan Zhong, Jiabin Liu, Dale Langford
{"title":"#36260 Machine learning to predict postoperative pain and opioid outcomes: promise or pitfall?","authors":"Julia Frederica Reichel, Haoyan Zhong, Jiabin Liu, Dale Langford","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2023-esra.417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3></h3> <b>Please confirm that an ethics committee approval has been applied for or granted:</b> Not relevant (see information at the bottom of this page) <b>Application for ESRA Abstract Prizes:</b> I don’t wish to apply for the ESRA Prizes <h3>Background and Aims</h3> Machine learning enables complex patient data to be distilled into predictive diagnostic tools. This review identified studies that applied machine learning to predict acute, subacute, or chronic pain or opioid use after any surgical procedure. <h3>Methods</h3> We searched PubMed using the following search strategy and terms: ‘machine learning’ OR ‘artificial intelligence’ AND ‘pain’ OR ‘opioid’ AND ‘surgery’ OR ‘postoperative’ AND ‘predict.’ The inclusion criteria were literature written in English that used machine learning and/or artificial intelligence to predict postoperative and/or opioid use after surgery. The exclusion criteria were reviews; protocol papers, commentaries; not a pain or opioid-related outcome; not a postoperative outcome; diagnostic or measurement tool. <h3>Results</h3> Thirty-nine studies were included (figure 1). Nineteen studies (48.7%) utilized machine learning to predict the outcome of chronic postoperative pain or function after any surgical procedure, followed by 12 studies (30.8%) utilizing machine learning to predict chronic postoperative opioid use. The most common algorithms were GBDT (n = 28), random forest algorithms (n = 23) and regularization algorithms (n = 22). 27 studies (69.2%) used preoperative pain as a predictor in the initial model. 22 studies (69.2%) used preoperative pain as a predictor in the final model. 25 studies (64.1%) used preoperative opioid use as a predictor in the initial model. 19 studies (54.3%) used preoperative opioid use as a predictor in the final model. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Machine learning can contribute to personalized perioperative pain management approaches. Patient-reported variables are important, salient predictors of acute, subacute, or chronic pain or opioid use after any surgical procedure. <h3>Attachment</h3> ESRA 2023 Machine Learning Abstract_5.21.2023_final.pdf","PeriodicalId":80519,"journal":{"name":"Archaeologia aeliana, or, Miscellaneous tracts relating to antiquity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeologia aeliana, or, Miscellaneous tracts relating to antiquity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2023-esra.417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Please confirm that an ethics committee approval has been applied for or granted: Not relevant (see information at the bottom of this page) Application for ESRA Abstract Prizes: I don’t wish to apply for the ESRA Prizes

Background and Aims

Machine learning enables complex patient data to be distilled into predictive diagnostic tools. This review identified studies that applied machine learning to predict acute, subacute, or chronic pain or opioid use after any surgical procedure.

Methods

We searched PubMed using the following search strategy and terms: ‘machine learning’ OR ‘artificial intelligence’ AND ‘pain’ OR ‘opioid’ AND ‘surgery’ OR ‘postoperative’ AND ‘predict.’ The inclusion criteria were literature written in English that used machine learning and/or artificial intelligence to predict postoperative and/or opioid use after surgery. The exclusion criteria were reviews; protocol papers, commentaries; not a pain or opioid-related outcome; not a postoperative outcome; diagnostic or measurement tool.

Results

Thirty-nine studies were included (figure 1). Nineteen studies (48.7%) utilized machine learning to predict the outcome of chronic postoperative pain or function after any surgical procedure, followed by 12 studies (30.8%) utilizing machine learning to predict chronic postoperative opioid use. The most common algorithms were GBDT (n = 28), random forest algorithms (n = 23) and regularization algorithms (n = 22). 27 studies (69.2%) used preoperative pain as a predictor in the initial model. 22 studies (69.2%) used preoperative pain as a predictor in the final model. 25 studies (64.1%) used preoperative opioid use as a predictor in the initial model. 19 studies (54.3%) used preoperative opioid use as a predictor in the final model.

Conclusions

Machine learning can contribute to personalized perioperative pain management approaches. Patient-reported variables are important, salient predictors of acute, subacute, or chronic pain or opioid use after any surgical procedure.

Attachment

ESRA 2023 Machine Learning Abstract_5.21.2023_final.pdf
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
#36260机器学习预测术后疼痛和阿片类药物的结果:希望还是陷阱?
请确认已申请或授予伦理委员会批准:不相关(见本页底部的信息)申请ESRA摘要奖:我不希望申请ESRA奖背景和目的机器学习使复杂的患者数据能够被提炼成预测诊断工具。本综述确定了应用机器学习预测任何外科手术后急性、亚急性或慢性疼痛或阿片类药物使用的研究。我们使用以下搜索策略和术语在PubMed中进行搜索:“机器学习”或“人工智能”与“疼痛”或“阿片类药物”与“手术”或“术后”与“预测”。“纳入标准是使用机器学习和/或人工智能来预测手术后和/或阿片类药物使用的英文文献。”排除标准为复查;议定书文件、评论;不是疼痛或阿片类药物相关的结果;不是术后结果;诊断或测量工具。结果纳入39项研究(图1)。19项研究(48.7%)利用机器学习预测任何外科手术后慢性术后疼痛或功能的结果,随后有12项研究(30.8%)利用机器学习预测术后慢性阿片类药物使用。最常见的算法是GBDT算法(n = 28)、随机森林算法(n = 23)和正则化算法(n = 22)。27项研究(69.2%)在初始模型中使用术前疼痛作为预测因子。22项研究(69.2%)使用术前疼痛作为最终模型的预测因子。25项研究(64.1%)在初始模型中使用术前阿片类药物使用作为预测因子。19项研究(54.3%)在最终模型中使用术前阿片类药物使用作为预测因子。结论机器学习有助于个性化围手术期疼痛管理方法。患者报告的变量很重要,是任何外科手术后急性、亚急性或慢性疼痛或阿片类药物使用的显著预测因素。附件ESRA 2023机器学习Abstract_5.21.2023_final.pdf
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
#35807 Erector spinae block for percutaneous kyphoplasty anesthetic management in high-risk patients: a case report #35918 A randomized control trial to evaluate the effects of Ketofol versus propofol on cerebral oxygenation in patients undergoing Trans-sphenoidal pituitary surgery under total intravenous anesthesia #35931 Regional anaesthesia for intubation and maintenance in myasthenia gravis patient with bilateral renal calculi #34666 Case report: Ablation of renal tumour in high bmi patient under single shot paravertebral and remifentanil #35938 Venovenous ECMO in near fatal ashtma: case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1