Examining how bystanders intervene and perpetrators respond to intervention during experiences of sexual aggression

IF 1.4 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.3138/cjhs-2022-0054
Kate B. Metcalfe, Lucia F. O’Sullivan, Scott T. Ronis
{"title":"Examining how bystanders intervene and perpetrators respond to intervention during experiences of sexual aggression","authors":"Kate B. Metcalfe, Lucia F. O’Sullivan, Scott T. Ronis","doi":"10.3138/cjhs-2022-0054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite increasing uptake of bystander intervention programs to prevent sexual aggression, rates of sexual violence have remained persistently high. Those who witness sexual aggression among their peers can provide another vantage point regarding the strategies that perpetrators use and valuable information about ways in which perpetrators divert bystanders’ intervention—all information that can inform prevention programs. Participants ( N = 247) completed structured and open-ended items about occasions they had witnessed that involved efforts to force sex on a non-consenting individual. Reports were content coded for strategies leading to sexual aggression for 99 participants who had witnessed a recent alleged act of sexual aggression. Most (93%) reported perpetrators’ use of early physical pressure (e.g., unwanted grinding, following, isolating, violating personal space, pulling, blocking others) that typically escalated into more overt physical pressure and force. Verbal coercion (e.g., arguing, insisting, begging) was witnessed by 40% of participants, and 14% of participants reported witnessing the target being pressured to consume excessive levels of alcohol. Coded themes captured perpetrators’ defensive interactions with concerned bystanders, such as making excuses, minimizing their intentions, feigning innocence, and using humour to divert attention from sexually aggressive efforts. Results have implications for prevention efforts incorporating bystanders as well as education about the risk of assault.","PeriodicalId":51789,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs-2022-0054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite increasing uptake of bystander intervention programs to prevent sexual aggression, rates of sexual violence have remained persistently high. Those who witness sexual aggression among their peers can provide another vantage point regarding the strategies that perpetrators use and valuable information about ways in which perpetrators divert bystanders’ intervention—all information that can inform prevention programs. Participants ( N = 247) completed structured and open-ended items about occasions they had witnessed that involved efforts to force sex on a non-consenting individual. Reports were content coded for strategies leading to sexual aggression for 99 participants who had witnessed a recent alleged act of sexual aggression. Most (93%) reported perpetrators’ use of early physical pressure (e.g., unwanted grinding, following, isolating, violating personal space, pulling, blocking others) that typically escalated into more overt physical pressure and force. Verbal coercion (e.g., arguing, insisting, begging) was witnessed by 40% of participants, and 14% of participants reported witnessing the target being pressured to consume excessive levels of alcohol. Coded themes captured perpetrators’ defensive interactions with concerned bystanders, such as making excuses, minimizing their intentions, feigning innocence, and using humour to divert attention from sexually aggressive efforts. Results have implications for prevention efforts incorporating bystanders as well as education about the risk of assault.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究在性侵犯经历中旁观者如何干预以及犯罪者对干预的反应
尽管越来越多的旁观者介入项目来防止性侵犯,性暴力的发生率仍然居高不下。那些在同龄人中目睹性侵犯的人可以提供另一个有利位置,了解犯罪者使用的策略,以及有关犯罪者转移旁观者干预的方式的宝贵信息——所有这些信息都可以为预防计划提供信息。参与者(N = 247)完成了结构化和开放式的项目,内容涉及他们目睹的强迫与不同意的人发生性行为的场合。报告的内容编码为导致性侵犯的策略,涉及99名最近目睹了所谓的性侵犯行为的参与者。大多数(93%)报告说,施暴者早期使用身体压力(例如,不必要的磨擦、跟踪、隔离、侵犯个人空间、拉、阻挡他人),通常会升级为更明显的身体压力和武力。40%的参与者目睹了口头胁迫(如争吵、坚持、乞求),14%的参与者报告目睹了目标被强迫过量饮酒。编码主题捕捉了犯罪者与关心的旁观者之间的防御性互动,比如找借口、最小化他们的意图、假装无辜,以及用幽默来转移人们对性侵犯行为的注意力。研究结果对包括旁观者在内的预防工作以及关于袭击风险的教育具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality
Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
21.40%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality (CJHS) is a quarterly peer-reviewed academic journal focusing on the medical, psychological, social, and educational aspects of human sexuality.
期刊最新文献
“Yes doesn’t always mean yes, but no means no”: Exploring the perceived ambiguities in university students’ experiences of sexual consent Gender Differences in Duration and Location of Erotic Touch in Mainstream Heterosexual Pornography Influences on Sexting in an Intimate Relationship: Motivations, Risks, Communication, Personality Traits, and Relationship Variables Speak Out: Lessons on How to Support Canadian 2SLGBTQI Youths Who Face Gender-Based Violence Recalling, Reacting But Not So Much Regretting: How Young Adults Describe Their Sexual and Romantic Infidelity Experiences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1