Literary Engagement and the Contemplative Disposition

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION Spiritus-A Journal of Christian Spirituality Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1353/scs.2023.a909103
Dennis Kinlaw
{"title":"Literary Engagement and the Contemplative Disposition","authors":"Dennis Kinlaw","doi":"10.1353/scs.2023.a909103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Literary Engagement and the Contemplative Disposition Dennis Kinlaw (bio) In his 2010 essay \"Reading in a Digital Age,\" literary critic Sven Birkets surveys media consumption and internet usage's devastating effects on the human attention span in general and literary engagement in particular.1 Awash in a torrent of information streams, readers have largely abandoned their capacity for immersive engagement to adopt more practical modes of textual consumption: grazing, clicking, skimming, and layering windows on computer screens, primarily. What appears at first another paean to less technologically saturated times, exactly the type of piece one might skim on a screen, takes on new depths when Birkets pivots from the general paranoia such technology produces to address his primary concern: contemplation. \"My real worry has less to do with the overthrow of human intelligence by Google-powered artificial intelligence and more with the rapid erosion of certain ways of thinking,\" Birkets writes, concluding, \"I find myself especially fixated on the idea that contemplative thought is endangered.\" As a \"non-instrumental\" mode of thinking that elevates reflection as an end in itself, contemplation emerges as uniquely imperiled in an age that favors rapid information over reflective self-formation. Contemplation, it seems, is the real casualty at the heart of our attention crisis. Cloaked in a quietude seemingly lost in contemporary culture, literature emerges less as a temporary respite from the shallows of contemporary life than as an aesthetic outpost whereby readers are equipped with the cognitive skills required for contemplative thought. Reading works of fiction, this essay intends to argue, resuscitates a self-modifying form of attention at the heart of the contemplative tradition. While writing from outside this tradition, Birkets recognizes as much when he describes the novel as a \"a mode of contemplation, its purpose being to create for the author and reader a terrain, an arena of liberation, where mind can be different.\"2 As scholars across disciplines develop compelling evidence for the mental,3 emotional,4 and social benefits5 of literary engagement, how might works of fiction also be examined for their capacity to provide readers a type of contemplative calisthenics? Furthermore, to what extent are the imaginative and perceptual demands reading requires [End Page 192] analogous to and often indistinguishable from the spiritual disciplines intrinsic to the contemplative tradition? Motivated by these questions, this essay sets out to explore how literary engagement fosters and forms the cognitive and spiritual resources prioritized in the contemplative tradition. Understood as a \"way of seeing things\" characterized by self-surrender and attuned to the \"hidden nonfinite\" depths latent in the finite world we live within, contemplation requires an altered outlook whereby one's self-interested and ends-oriented approach to reality is radically reframed.6 Achieving this outlook, however, entails a certain recalibration in the ways one typically attunes oneself to the world. In hopes of illuminating some of the ways literary engagement resources contemplative modes of knowing, I address the following three stages of reading as distinct stages of contemplative recalibration: (1) self-surrender, (2) perceptual attunement, and (3) narrative absorption. Each of these stages, I argue, invites readers into a type of contemplative posture grounded in an enhanced receptivity to otherness. If an exploration into the phenomenology of reading falls terrifically short of the beatific vision at the heart of historic forms of contemplatio, this essay makes the case that it is precisely upon one's capacity for the types of cognitive skills reading requires that such exalted states are largely determined. While grace is a gift given without warning, there remains merit in the making-ready to receive this gift. Literary engagement, through cognitive processes whose spiritual dimension is implicit, resources this making-ready within the receptive reader. Before I examine the three stages of contemplative recalibration literature affords, I would like to begin at a more fundamental point that connects the contemplative and literary traditions. Whether coming from a contemporary literary critic or a twelfth-century Carthusian monk, the first step to reclaiming one's capacity for contemplation remains the same: read. READING ON THE FIRST RUNG Reading holds a privileged place within the contemplative tradition. Grounded in the recognition of reading's potential to lead...","PeriodicalId":42348,"journal":{"name":"Spiritus-A Journal of Christian Spirituality","volume":"104 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spiritus-A Journal of Christian Spirituality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/scs.2023.a909103","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Literary Engagement and the Contemplative Disposition Dennis Kinlaw (bio) In his 2010 essay "Reading in a Digital Age," literary critic Sven Birkets surveys media consumption and internet usage's devastating effects on the human attention span in general and literary engagement in particular.1 Awash in a torrent of information streams, readers have largely abandoned their capacity for immersive engagement to adopt more practical modes of textual consumption: grazing, clicking, skimming, and layering windows on computer screens, primarily. What appears at first another paean to less technologically saturated times, exactly the type of piece one might skim on a screen, takes on new depths when Birkets pivots from the general paranoia such technology produces to address his primary concern: contemplation. "My real worry has less to do with the overthrow of human intelligence by Google-powered artificial intelligence and more with the rapid erosion of certain ways of thinking," Birkets writes, concluding, "I find myself especially fixated on the idea that contemplative thought is endangered." As a "non-instrumental" mode of thinking that elevates reflection as an end in itself, contemplation emerges as uniquely imperiled in an age that favors rapid information over reflective self-formation. Contemplation, it seems, is the real casualty at the heart of our attention crisis. Cloaked in a quietude seemingly lost in contemporary culture, literature emerges less as a temporary respite from the shallows of contemporary life than as an aesthetic outpost whereby readers are equipped with the cognitive skills required for contemplative thought. Reading works of fiction, this essay intends to argue, resuscitates a self-modifying form of attention at the heart of the contemplative tradition. While writing from outside this tradition, Birkets recognizes as much when he describes the novel as a "a mode of contemplation, its purpose being to create for the author and reader a terrain, an arena of liberation, where mind can be different."2 As scholars across disciplines develop compelling evidence for the mental,3 emotional,4 and social benefits5 of literary engagement, how might works of fiction also be examined for their capacity to provide readers a type of contemplative calisthenics? Furthermore, to what extent are the imaginative and perceptual demands reading requires [End Page 192] analogous to and often indistinguishable from the spiritual disciplines intrinsic to the contemplative tradition? Motivated by these questions, this essay sets out to explore how literary engagement fosters and forms the cognitive and spiritual resources prioritized in the contemplative tradition. Understood as a "way of seeing things" characterized by self-surrender and attuned to the "hidden nonfinite" depths latent in the finite world we live within, contemplation requires an altered outlook whereby one's self-interested and ends-oriented approach to reality is radically reframed.6 Achieving this outlook, however, entails a certain recalibration in the ways one typically attunes oneself to the world. In hopes of illuminating some of the ways literary engagement resources contemplative modes of knowing, I address the following three stages of reading as distinct stages of contemplative recalibration: (1) self-surrender, (2) perceptual attunement, and (3) narrative absorption. Each of these stages, I argue, invites readers into a type of contemplative posture grounded in an enhanced receptivity to otherness. If an exploration into the phenomenology of reading falls terrifically short of the beatific vision at the heart of historic forms of contemplatio, this essay makes the case that it is precisely upon one's capacity for the types of cognitive skills reading requires that such exalted states are largely determined. While grace is a gift given without warning, there remains merit in the making-ready to receive this gift. Literary engagement, through cognitive processes whose spiritual dimension is implicit, resources this making-ready within the receptive reader. Before I examine the three stages of contemplative recalibration literature affords, I would like to begin at a more fundamental point that connects the contemplative and literary traditions. Whether coming from a contemporary literary critic or a twelfth-century Carthusian monk, the first step to reclaiming one's capacity for contemplation remains the same: read. READING ON THE FIRST RUNG Reading holds a privileged place within the contemplative tradition. Grounded in the recognition of reading's potential to lead...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
文学参与与沉思倾向
文学评论家Sven Birkets在他2010年的文章《数字时代的阅读》中调查了媒体消费和互联网使用对人类注意力持续时间的破坏性影响,尤其是对文学参与的破坏性影响在信息流的洪流中,读者已经在很大程度上放弃了沉浸式参与的能力,转而采用更实用的文本消费模式:主要是在电脑屏幕上浏览、点击、略读和分层窗口。乍一看,这是对科技不那么饱和的时代的另一首赞歌,正是人们可能会在屏幕上略读的那种作品,当Birkets从这种技术产生的普遍偏执转向解决他的主要问题时,它进入了新的深度:沉思。“我真正担心的不是谷歌驱动的人工智能对人类智慧的颠覆,而是某些思维方式的迅速侵蚀,”Birkets写道,并总结道,“我发现自己特别关注沉思思维受到威胁的观点。”作为一种“非工具性”的思维方式,沉思本身就是一种目的,在一个倾向于快速获取信息而不是反思自我形成的时代,沉思是一种独特的危险。沉思,似乎是我们注意力危机核心的真正受害者。文学被一种似乎在当代文化中消失的宁静所掩盖,与其说是作为当代生活肤浅的暂时休息,不如说是作为一个审美前哨,读者在这里可以获得沉思思考所需的认知技能。阅读小说作品,这篇文章打算论证,在沉思传统的核心,复兴一种自我修正的注意力形式。虽然伯基茨的写作方式超越了这一传统,但他把小说描述为“一种沉思的模式,其目的是为作者和读者创造一个领域,一个解放的舞台,在那里思想可以不同。”随着各个学科的学者们为文学创作在精神、情感和社会方面的益处提供了令人信服的证据,那么小说作品为读者提供一种沉思健美操的能力如何也能得到检验呢?此外,阅读所要求的想象力和感性要求在多大程度上类似于冥想传统中固有的精神纪律,并且常常难以区分?在这些问题的推动下,本文开始探讨文学参与如何培养和形成沉思传统中优先考虑的认知和精神资源。冥想被理解为一种“看事物的方式”,其特点是自我臣服,并与我们生活的有限世界中隐藏的“隐藏的非有限”深度相协调,冥想需要改变一种观点,从而从根本上重新构建一个人的自我利益和以目标为导向的现实方法然而,要实现这一愿景,就需要在某种程度上重新校准一个人与世界协调的典型方式。为了阐明文学参与资源沉思式认知模式的一些方式,我将以下三个阅读阶段作为沉思式重新校准的不同阶段:(1)自我投降,(2)感知调节,(3)叙事吸收。我认为,每一个阶段都邀请读者进入一种沉思的状态,这种状态建立在对他人的接受能力增强的基础上。如果对阅读现象学的探索远远没有达到历史上沉思形式核心的美好愿景,那么这篇文章认为,阅读所需要的认知技能类型正是一个人的能力,这种崇高状态在很大程度上是决定的。虽然恩典是一种没有警告的礼物,但在准备好接受这份礼物时,仍然有价值。文学参与,通过其精神维度是隐含的认知过程,在接受的读者中准备好资源。在我研究文学提供的沉思重新校准的三个阶段之前,我想从连接沉思和文学传统的更基本的一点开始。无论是来自当代文学评论家还是来自12世纪的卡尔萨斯修士,恢复一个人沉思能力的第一步都是一样的:阅读。阅读在沉思的传统中占有特殊的地位。基于对阅读的领导潜力的认识……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
25.00%
发文量
56
期刊最新文献
'AJ's Orbicularis Oris Stitch: A Novel and Simple Technique of Reconstructing Central Arch Mandibular Defects in Resource-Constrained Set Up'. Modern Mystics: An Introduction by Bernard McGinn (review) Art and Faith: A Theology of Making by Makoto Fujimura (review) Before Poetry O Gracious Light
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1