The double reduction policy and education development in China

IF 1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal of Comparative Education and Development Pub Date : 2023-10-03 DOI:10.1108/ijced-09-2022-0063
Keqing Zhong, Jae Park
{"title":"The double reduction policy and education development in China","authors":"Keqing Zhong, Jae Park","doi":"10.1108/ijced-09-2022-0063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This policy review paper is an analysis of the Double Reduction Policy (DRP) of China that was promulgated in July 2021. It looks into its rationale as well as different stakeholders' early reactions to the policy. Design/methodology/approach Critical policy analysis (CPA) method was used to identify (1) the artefacts, such as language, objects and acts, that were significant carriers of the DRP; (2) communities of meaning, interpretation, speech and practice that are relevant to the DRP and its implementation; (3) the local discourses relevant to the DRP; and (4) the tension points and their conceptual sources (affective, cognitive and/or moral) by different DRP stakeholders. As per the comparative education field, this paper compares the pre-DRP and post-DRP periods to tease out how the policy affects different stakeholders of education. Findings The DRP in China could be attributed to diverse factors such as demography, socialist economic and developmental visions and manpower structure. The implementation of the DRP has generated uneven reactions among different stakeholders and geographical regions both in speed and scale. While education stakeholders have no choice but to adopt the policy, they face challenges derived from a sudden halt of private educational resources and subsequent increased duties of parents and schools. Originality/value The significance of this early policy analysis lies in offering an insight into education development in China by analysing and deliberating the DRP from different perspectives.","PeriodicalId":51967,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Comparative Education and Development","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Comparative Education and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijced-09-2022-0063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This policy review paper is an analysis of the Double Reduction Policy (DRP) of China that was promulgated in July 2021. It looks into its rationale as well as different stakeholders' early reactions to the policy. Design/methodology/approach Critical policy analysis (CPA) method was used to identify (1) the artefacts, such as language, objects and acts, that were significant carriers of the DRP; (2) communities of meaning, interpretation, speech and practice that are relevant to the DRP and its implementation; (3) the local discourses relevant to the DRP; and (4) the tension points and their conceptual sources (affective, cognitive and/or moral) by different DRP stakeholders. As per the comparative education field, this paper compares the pre-DRP and post-DRP periods to tease out how the policy affects different stakeholders of education. Findings The DRP in China could be attributed to diverse factors such as demography, socialist economic and developmental visions and manpower structure. The implementation of the DRP has generated uneven reactions among different stakeholders and geographical regions both in speed and scale. While education stakeholders have no choice but to adopt the policy, they face challenges derived from a sudden halt of private educational resources and subsequent increased duties of parents and schools. Originality/value The significance of this early policy analysis lies in offering an insight into education development in China by analysing and deliberating the DRP from different perspectives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双十一政策与中国教育发展
本政策审查文件是对中国于2021年7月颁布的双减政策(DRP)的分析。它研究了其基本原理以及不同利益相关者对该政策的早期反应。设计/方法/方法关键政策分析(CPA)方法用于识别:(1)作为DRP重要载体的人工制品,如语言、物体和行为;(2)与DRP及其实施相关的意义、解释、言论和实践社区;(3)与DRP相关的地方话语;(4)不同DRP利益相关者的紧张点及其概念来源(情感、认知和/或道德)。在比较教育领域,本文通过对政策实施前和政策实施后的比较,梳理出政策对不同教育利益相关者的影响。研究发现,中国的农村发展滞后与人口结构、社会主义经济发展理念、人力结构等因素有关。DRP的实施在不同利益攸关方和地理区域之间产生了速度和规模不一的反应。虽然教育利益相关者别无选择,只能采取这一政策,但他们面临着私人教育资源突然停止以及随之而来的家长和学校责任增加的挑战。这一早期政策分析的意义在于,通过从不同角度分析和审议DRP,为中国的教育发展提供了一个视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
A critical evaluation of the validity of socioeconomic measures used in PISA Envisioning quality education for sustainability transformation in teacher education: perspectives from an international dialogue on Sustainable Development Goal 4 Vedic mathematics for sustainable knowledge: a systematic literature review Educational aspirations of school adolescents in Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan: how are these aspirations shaped? Reasonable adjustment for inclusive development: a cautionary case study of Australian VET teachers’ experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1