{"title":"Seismic Responses of Concrete Building Subjected to Out-of-phase Ground Motions","authors":"Yohanes Karyanto, Dario Rosidi, Pamuda Pudjisuryadi","doi":"10.9744/ced.25.2.96-105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Seismic performance of a building is commonly evaluated by applying same design ground motions at each building foundation. However, local soil conditions beneath a building likely vary, and these variations could result in out-of-phased design ground motions at each of the foundation locations. In this study, building’s responses during earthquakes were analyzed and compared using same and out-of-phase ground motions. The building is 10-story, 90m-wide, reinforced concrete structure supported on isolated footings with tie beams. Dynamic time response analyses were performed using five earthquake records which were scaled to a design response spectrum for a location in Surabaya. Seismic modification factor, R, of 8 was used. The results indicate that the use of out-of-phase ground motions does not have significant impacts on building inter-story drifts; it results, however in significantly higher column base shears and tie beam axial forces compared to those calculated using same ground motions.","PeriodicalId":30107,"journal":{"name":"Civil Engineering Dimension","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Civil Engineering Dimension","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9744/ced.25.2.96-105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Seismic performance of a building is commonly evaluated by applying same design ground motions at each building foundation. However, local soil conditions beneath a building likely vary, and these variations could result in out-of-phased design ground motions at each of the foundation locations. In this study, building’s responses during earthquakes were analyzed and compared using same and out-of-phase ground motions. The building is 10-story, 90m-wide, reinforced concrete structure supported on isolated footings with tie beams. Dynamic time response analyses were performed using five earthquake records which were scaled to a design response spectrum for a location in Surabaya. Seismic modification factor, R, of 8 was used. The results indicate that the use of out-of-phase ground motions does not have significant impacts on building inter-story drifts; it results, however in significantly higher column base shears and tie beam axial forces compared to those calculated using same ground motions.