{"title":"Two-sample test for ambivalent subset relationship in fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis","authors":"Francesco Veri","doi":"10.1007/s11135-023-01687-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA), ambivalent subset relationships (ASR), occur when solution term X is in subset relation with the outcome Y and its absence ~ Y, leading to false-positive results. While ASR can be empirically detected in small-N and medium-N cases through in-depth case knowledge, it is challenging to identify them in large-N case designs. QCA parameters such as proportion reduction inconsistency (PRI) and consistency are commonly used to identify simultaneous subset relationships (SSR), but they are not specifically designed to detect ASR. To address this issue, this article introduces the DTS test, a new test based on two-sample statistics. The DTS test identifies distributional convergence between a solution term’s empirical cumulative distribution function (eCDF) and an eCDF of solution formulas with asymptotic ASR characteristics. By comparing empirical solutions’ patterns with spurious artificially built solutions' patterns, the DTS test reduces the risk of causal fallacies in interpreting the empirical results. Overall, the DTS test provides a valuable tool for identifying and addressing potential ASR bias in fsQCA, particularly in large-N case designs.","PeriodicalId":49649,"journal":{"name":"Quality & Quantity","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality & Quantity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01687-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract In fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA), ambivalent subset relationships (ASR), occur when solution term X is in subset relation with the outcome Y and its absence ~ Y, leading to false-positive results. While ASR can be empirically detected in small-N and medium-N cases through in-depth case knowledge, it is challenging to identify them in large-N case designs. QCA parameters such as proportion reduction inconsistency (PRI) and consistency are commonly used to identify simultaneous subset relationships (SSR), but they are not specifically designed to detect ASR. To address this issue, this article introduces the DTS test, a new test based on two-sample statistics. The DTS test identifies distributional convergence between a solution term’s empirical cumulative distribution function (eCDF) and an eCDF of solution formulas with asymptotic ASR characteristics. By comparing empirical solutions’ patterns with spurious artificially built solutions' patterns, the DTS test reduces the risk of causal fallacies in interpreting the empirical results. Overall, the DTS test provides a valuable tool for identifying and addressing potential ASR bias in fsQCA, particularly in large-N case designs.
期刊介绍:
Quality and Quantity constitutes a point of reference for European and non-European scholars to discuss instruments of methodology for more rigorous scientific results in the social sciences. In the era of biggish data, the journal also provides a publication venue for data scientists who are interested in proposing a new indicator to measure the latent aspects of social, cultural, and political events. Rather than leaning towards one specific methodological school, the journal publishes papers on a mixed method of quantitative and qualitative data. Furthermore, the journal’s key aim is to tackle some methodological pluralism across research cultures. In this context, the journal is open to papers addressing some general logic of empirical research and analysis of the validity and verification of social laws. Thus The journal accepts papers on science metrics and publication ethics and, their related issues affecting methodological practices among researchers.
Quality and Quantity is an interdisciplinary journal which systematically correlates disciplines such as data and information sciences with the other humanities and social sciences. The journal extends discussion of interesting contributions in methodology to scholars worldwide, to promote the scientific development of social research.