Aptis Distal Radioulnar Joint Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Evaluation of Functional Outcomes, Complications, and Patient Satisfaction

Pub Date : 2023-09-13 DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1774317
Shirley D. Stougie, Leonieke C. van Boekel, Annechien Beumer, Peter Hoogvliet, Simon D. Strackee, J. Henk Coert
{"title":"Aptis Distal Radioulnar Joint Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Evaluation of Functional Outcomes, Complications, and Patient Satisfaction","authors":"Shirley D. Stougie, Leonieke C. van Boekel, Annechien Beumer, Peter Hoogvliet, Simon D. Strackee, J. Henk Coert","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1774317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background The Aptis distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) implant has been commonly used to replace the DRUJ and restore wrist function in patients with a severely destroyed DRUJ. Objective Promising results have been described in the literature. However, the clinical results in a multicenter setting are sparse and variable. This study evaluates the short- to midterm clinical results of 53 patients with a (mean) follow-up of 51 months. Patients and Methods Fifty-three patients (59 implants) treated between 2011 and 2020 in three different institutions were retrospectively identified in a prospectively collected database. The main indication for Aptis DRUJ arthroplasty was a destroyed DRUJ and gross distal radioulnar instability and isolated DRUJ osteoarthritis. Functional outcome, complications, and patient satisfaction were evaluated. Patients completed the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) questionnaire and an additional questionnaire about patient satisfaction and return to hobby/work. Results Implant survival was 92%, the surgical follow-up showed many complications (64,4%), and revision surgery was needed frequently (40.7%). In 13 cases, the follow-up was longer than 5 years. Three reimplantations had to be performed and two implants were permanently explanted. In spite of this all, wrist and forearm motion as well as pain reduction was adequate and patient satisfaction was reasonable (72.2%). Conclusion The Aptis DRUJ arthroplasty is a viable option that can provide adequate wrist and forearm function after secure patient selection and surgical placement of the implant in the wrist with a good bone stock of the radius. The complication rate was found to be high, yet patient satisfaction was reasonable. In the case of secondary surgery, additional surgery seems to be needed. For primary surgery, the implant seems to be successful without complications. Different complications have been described, but further analysis is warranted to find the causes of complications and to objectify the performance of the Aptis DRUJ implant. Level of Evidence IV.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1774317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Background The Aptis distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) implant has been commonly used to replace the DRUJ and restore wrist function in patients with a severely destroyed DRUJ. Objective Promising results have been described in the literature. However, the clinical results in a multicenter setting are sparse and variable. This study evaluates the short- to midterm clinical results of 53 patients with a (mean) follow-up of 51 months. Patients and Methods Fifty-three patients (59 implants) treated between 2011 and 2020 in three different institutions were retrospectively identified in a prospectively collected database. The main indication for Aptis DRUJ arthroplasty was a destroyed DRUJ and gross distal radioulnar instability and isolated DRUJ osteoarthritis. Functional outcome, complications, and patient satisfaction were evaluated. Patients completed the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) questionnaire and an additional questionnaire about patient satisfaction and return to hobby/work. Results Implant survival was 92%, the surgical follow-up showed many complications (64,4%), and revision surgery was needed frequently (40.7%). In 13 cases, the follow-up was longer than 5 years. Three reimplantations had to be performed and two implants were permanently explanted. In spite of this all, wrist and forearm motion as well as pain reduction was adequate and patient satisfaction was reasonable (72.2%). Conclusion The Aptis DRUJ arthroplasty is a viable option that can provide adequate wrist and forearm function after secure patient selection and surgical placement of the implant in the wrist with a good bone stock of the radius. The complication rate was found to be high, yet patient satisfaction was reasonable. In the case of secondary surgery, additional surgery seems to be needed. For primary surgery, the implant seems to be successful without complications. Different complications have been described, but further analysis is warranted to find the causes of complications and to objectify the performance of the Aptis DRUJ implant. Level of Evidence IV.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
远端尺桡关节置换术:功能结果、并发症和患者满意度的多中心评估
摘要背景Aptis远端桡尺关节(Aptis distal radioulnar joint, DRUJ)种植体已被广泛应用于重度桡尺关节破坏患者的腕部功能修复。目的在文献中描述了一些有希望的结果。然而,临床结果在多中心设置是稀疏和可变的。本研究评估了53例患者的中短期临床结果,平均随访时间为51个月。患者和方法回顾性分析了2011年至2020年间在三家不同机构接受治疗的53例患者(59例植入物)。Aptis DRUJ关节置换术的主要适应症是破坏的DRUJ、尺桡远端不稳定和孤立的DRUJ骨关节炎。评估功能结局、并发症和患者满意度。患者完成了患者评定腕关节评估(PRWE)问卷和另外一份关于患者满意度和爱好/工作回归的问卷。结果种植体成活率为92%,术后并发症较多(64.4%),需翻修手术较多(40.7%)。13例随访时间超过5年。三次再植,两次植入物被永久移除。尽管如此,手腕和前臂的活动以及疼痛的减轻是足够的,患者满意度是合理的(72.2%)。结论Aptis DRUJ关节置换术是一种可行的选择,在患者选择安全并手术植入具有良好桡骨的腕关节后,可以提供足够的腕和前臂功能。术后并发症发生率较高,但患者满意度较好。在二次手术的情况下,似乎需要额外的手术。对于初次手术,植入似乎是成功的,没有并发症。不同的并发症已被描述,但需要进一步分析以找到并发症的原因并客观评价Aptis DRUJ假体的性能。证据级别IV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1