Study of Central Nervous System Malformations of Perinatal Autopsies

Anuradha G Patil, Shweta Ghatapanadi, Safura Batul, Anita A M
{"title":"Study of Central Nervous System Malformations of Perinatal Autopsies","authors":"Anuradha G Patil, Shweta Ghatapanadi, Safura Batul, Anita A M","doi":"10.47799/pimr.1101.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: Congenital malformations remain a common cause of perinatal deaths accounting for 10-15% in developing countries like India. They are the most severe disorders of the central nervous system. Although antenatal screening for congenital anomalies has been improved over the years, fetal autopsy remains the gold standard for the identification and confirmation of congenital malformations. The present study emphasizes the importance of perinatal autopsy for understanding the cause of death and also conformation of the antenatal diagnosis of the spectrum of various congenital CNS malformations. Methods: We studied 644 perinatal autopsies conducted in our hospital. The duration of the study was 5 years, from 1 st August 2015 to 31 st July 2020 that included all perinatal autopsies with gestational age of 22 weeks to less than 7 days. Results: Out of 644 perinatal autopsies 125 cases (19.4%) had congenital anomalies, of which 62 cases (9.6%) showed CNS malformations. The most common CNS anomalies encountered were anencephaly 14 cases (22.6%) followed by 10 cases (16.1%) each of spina bifida and meningocele, and 8 cases (12.9%) of meningomyelocele. In the present study, 6 (9.7%) cases of CNS malformations were associated with known syndromes namely Edward syndrome, Potter’s syndrome, and KlippelFeil syndrome. Along with CNS in 21 (33.9%) cases we observed associated malformations of other systems with 7 cases involving the musculoskeletal system, 3 cases involving the genitourinary system, and 5 (8.1%) cases showing multisystem involvement. Conclusion: Antenatal screening for congenital anomalies has been improved over the years. Even then fetal autopsy remains the gold standard for the identification and confirmation of congenital malformations. Understanding this gives valuable information that can be further helpful in the genetic counseling of the parents.","PeriodicalId":30624,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives In Medical Research","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives In Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47799/pimr.1101.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background: Congenital malformations remain a common cause of perinatal deaths accounting for 10-15% in developing countries like India. They are the most severe disorders of the central nervous system. Although antenatal screening for congenital anomalies has been improved over the years, fetal autopsy remains the gold standard for the identification and confirmation of congenital malformations. The present study emphasizes the importance of perinatal autopsy for understanding the cause of death and also conformation of the antenatal diagnosis of the spectrum of various congenital CNS malformations. Methods: We studied 644 perinatal autopsies conducted in our hospital. The duration of the study was 5 years, from 1 st August 2015 to 31 st July 2020 that included all perinatal autopsies with gestational age of 22 weeks to less than 7 days. Results: Out of 644 perinatal autopsies 125 cases (19.4%) had congenital anomalies, of which 62 cases (9.6%) showed CNS malformations. The most common CNS anomalies encountered were anencephaly 14 cases (22.6%) followed by 10 cases (16.1%) each of spina bifida and meningocele, and 8 cases (12.9%) of meningomyelocele. In the present study, 6 (9.7%) cases of CNS malformations were associated with known syndromes namely Edward syndrome, Potter’s syndrome, and KlippelFeil syndrome. Along with CNS in 21 (33.9%) cases we observed associated malformations of other systems with 7 cases involving the musculoskeletal system, 3 cases involving the genitourinary system, and 5 (8.1%) cases showing multisystem involvement. Conclusion: Antenatal screening for congenital anomalies has been improved over the years. Even then fetal autopsy remains the gold standard for the identification and confirmation of congenital malformations. Understanding this gives valuable information that can be further helpful in the genetic counseling of the parents.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
围产期尸检中中枢神经系统畸形的研究
背景:先天性畸形仍然是围产期死亡的常见原因,在印度等发展中国家占10-15%。它们是中枢神经系统最严重的紊乱。虽然先天性畸形的产前筛查多年来已经有所改善,但胎儿尸检仍然是鉴定和确认先天性畸形的金标准。本研究强调围产期尸检对了解死亡原因的重要性,以及对各种先天性中枢神经系统畸形的产前诊断的一致性。方法:对我院644例围产儿尸检进行分析。研究持续时间为5年,从2015年8月1日至2020年7月31日,包括所有胎龄为22周至小于7天的围产期尸检。结果:644例围产儿尸检中,先天性异常125例(19.4%),其中中枢神经系统畸形62例(9.6%)。最常见的中枢神经系统异常是无脑畸形14例(22.6%),其次是脊柱裂和脑膜膨出各10例(16.1%),脑膜脊膜膨出8例(12.9%)。在本研究中,6例(9.7%)中枢神经系统畸形伴有已知综合征,即爱德华综合征、波特综合征和KlippelFeil综合征。除中枢神经系统外,21例(33.9%)患者伴有其他系统畸形,其中7例累及肌肉骨骼系统,3例累及泌尿生殖系统,5例(8.1%)患者累及多系统。结论:近年来,先天性异常的产前筛查有所改善。即使如此,胎儿解剖仍然是鉴定和确认先天性畸形的金标准。了解这一点可以提供有价值的信息,可以进一步帮助父母的遗传咨询。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessment of peripheral lymph node tuberculosis: a prospective study of 24 cases Histopathological study on the spectrum of various sinonasal lesions Socio-demographic correlates and psychosocial stressors among suicide attempters attending a tertiary care general hospital Radiological study of foramen arcuale: implications for screw insertion via posterior arch for fixation of C1 vertebrae in atlantoaxial instability using plain radiograph Artificial Intelligence and Computational Pathology: A comprehensive review of advancements and applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1