Relationships of Residential Distance to Major Traffic Roads with Dementia Incidence and Brain Structure Measures: Mediation Role of Air Pollution

Chenglong Li, Darui Gao, Yutong Samuel Cai, Jie Liang, Yongqian Wang, Yang Pan, Wenya Zhang, Fanfan Zheng, Wuxiang Xie
{"title":"Relationships of Residential Distance to Major Traffic Roads with Dementia Incidence and Brain Structure Measures: Mediation Role of Air Pollution","authors":"Chenglong Li, Darui Gao, Yutong Samuel Cai, Jie Liang, Yongqian Wang, Yang Pan, Wenya Zhang, Fanfan Zheng, Wuxiang Xie","doi":"10.34133/hds.0091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Uncertainty exists regarding the operating pathways between near-roadway exposure and dementia incidence. We intend to examine relationships between proximity to major roadways with dementia incidence and brain MRI structure measures, and potential mediation roles of air and noise pollution. Methods: The cohort study was based on the UK Biobank. Baseline survey was conducted from 2006 to 2010, with linkage to electronic health records conducted for follow-up. Residential distance to major roadways was ascertained residential address postcode. A land use regression model was applied for estimating traffic-related air pollution at residence. Dementia incidence was ascertained using national administrative databases. Brain MRI measures were derived as image-derived phenotypes, including total brain, white matter, gray matter, and peripheral cortical gray matter. Results: We included 460,901 participants [mean (SD) age: 57.1 (8.1) years; men: 45.7%]. Compared with individuals living >1,000 m from major traffic roads, living ≤1,000 m was associated with a 13% to 14% higher dementia risk, accounting for 10% of dementia cases. Observed association between residential distance and dementia was substantially mediated by traffic-related air pollution, mainly nitrogen dioxide (proportion mediated: 63.6%; 95% CI, 27.0 to 89.2%) and PM 2.5 (60.9%, 26.8 to 87.0%). The shorter residential distance was associated with smaller volumes of brain structures, which was also mediated by traffic-related air pollutants. No significant mediation role was observed of noise pollution. Conclusions: The shorter residential distance to major roads was associated with elevated dementia incidence and smaller brain structure volumes, which was mainly mediated by traffic-related air pollution.","PeriodicalId":73207,"journal":{"name":"Health data science","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health data science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34133/hds.0091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Uncertainty exists regarding the operating pathways between near-roadway exposure and dementia incidence. We intend to examine relationships between proximity to major roadways with dementia incidence and brain MRI structure measures, and potential mediation roles of air and noise pollution. Methods: The cohort study was based on the UK Biobank. Baseline survey was conducted from 2006 to 2010, with linkage to electronic health records conducted for follow-up. Residential distance to major roadways was ascertained residential address postcode. A land use regression model was applied for estimating traffic-related air pollution at residence. Dementia incidence was ascertained using national administrative databases. Brain MRI measures were derived as image-derived phenotypes, including total brain, white matter, gray matter, and peripheral cortical gray matter. Results: We included 460,901 participants [mean (SD) age: 57.1 (8.1) years; men: 45.7%]. Compared with individuals living >1,000 m from major traffic roads, living ≤1,000 m was associated with a 13% to 14% higher dementia risk, accounting for 10% of dementia cases. Observed association between residential distance and dementia was substantially mediated by traffic-related air pollution, mainly nitrogen dioxide (proportion mediated: 63.6%; 95% CI, 27.0 to 89.2%) and PM 2.5 (60.9%, 26.8 to 87.0%). The shorter residential distance was associated with smaller volumes of brain structures, which was also mediated by traffic-related air pollutants. No significant mediation role was observed of noise pollution. Conclusions: The shorter residential distance to major roads was associated with elevated dementia incidence and smaller brain structure volumes, which was mainly mediated by traffic-related air pollution.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
居住距离主要交通道路与痴呆发病率和脑结构测量的关系:空气污染的中介作用
背景:近道路暴露与痴呆发病之间的作用途径存在不确定性。我们打算研究靠近主要道路与痴呆发病率和脑MRI结构测量之间的关系,以及空气和噪音污染的潜在中介作用。方法:队列研究基于UK Biobank。2006年至2010年进行了基线调查,并与电子健康记录联系起来进行后续调查。确定了住宅与主要道路的距离,确定了住宅地址和邮政编码。采用土地利用回归模型对住宅交通相关空气污染进行估算。使用国家行政数据库确定痴呆发病率。脑MRI测量结果衍生为图像衍生表型,包括全脑、白质、灰质和外周皮层灰质。结果:我们纳入了460,901名参与者[平均(SD)年龄:57.1(8.1)岁;男性:45.7%)。与居住距离主要交通道路1000米的人群相比,居住距离≤1000米的人群痴呆风险增加13% - 14%,占痴呆病例的10%。已观察到的居住距离与痴呆之间的关联基本上由交通相关的空气污染介导,主要是二氧化氮(比例介导:63.6%;95% CI, 27.0 ~ 89.2%)和PM 2.5(60.9%, 26.8 ~ 87.0%)。居住距离越短,大脑结构体积越小,这也与交通相关的空气污染物有关。噪声污染未见显著的中介作用。结论:住宅距离主干道较短与痴呆发病率升高和脑结构体积较小相关,这主要与交通相关的空气污染有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Multi-Modal CLIP-Informed Protein Editing. The Burden of Type 2 Diabetes in Adolescents and Young Adults in China: A Secondary Analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Federated Learning in Healthcare: A Benchmark Comparison of Engineering and Statistical Approaches for Structured Data Analysis. Robust Meta-Model for Predicting the Likelihood of Receiving Blood Transfusion in Non-traumatic Intensive Care Unit Patients. Survival Disparities among Cancer Patients Based on Mobility Patterns: A Population-Based Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1