Assessment of Interobserver Agreement in the Interpretation of <sup>99m</sup>Tc-PYP SPECT Imaging of Cardiac Amyloidosis

Aiganym Imakhanova, Reiko Ideguchi, Akiyo Chiba, Takashi Kudo
{"title":"Assessment of Interobserver Agreement in the Interpretation of &lt;sup&gt;99m&lt;/sup&gt;Tc-PYP SPECT Imaging of Cardiac Amyloidosis","authors":"Aiganym Imakhanova, Reiko Ideguchi, Akiyo Chiba, Takashi Kudo","doi":"10.17996/anc.23-00004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Technetium-99m pyrophosphate single photon emission computed tomography (99mTc-PYP SPECT) imaging is widely used to diagnose cardiac amyloidosis, a disease characterized by amyloid protein deposits in the myocardium. The effects of viewing perspectives on interobserver agreement in the interpretation of 99mTc-PYP SPECT images for the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis remain unclear.Methods: A retrospective analysis of 32 consecutive patients who underwent 99mTc-PYP imaging for the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis at Nagasaki University Hospital between October 2017 and February 2020 was performed. Four evaluators independently reviewed coronal, sagittal, and transaxial images and then all images together and made a categorical diagnosis based on predefined criteria. Interobserver agreement was analyzed using Cohen's Kappa analysis.Results: Kappa coefficient values in the four-grade grading system (grades 0–3) ranged between 0.31 and 0.95, while those in the binary grading system (positive/negative) ranged between 0.88 and 1. The sagittal view showed the highest value in the four-grade grading system (0.95) and the lowest in the binary grading system (0.88). The transaxial view was more likely to show a consistently high kappa value in both the four-grade and binary grading systems. The use of the multiplanar view reduced the number of subjects classified as grade 1.Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that the transaxial view provides the most consistent interpretation of 99mTc-PYP SPECT images for the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis. The use of the multiplanar view may also reduce equivocal interpretations, which are graded as grade 1. Further studies with larger sample sizes and a quantitative analysis are needed to confirm the present results.","PeriodicalId":72228,"journal":{"name":"Annals of nuclear cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of nuclear cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17996/anc.23-00004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Technetium-99m pyrophosphate single photon emission computed tomography (99mTc-PYP SPECT) imaging is widely used to diagnose cardiac amyloidosis, a disease characterized by amyloid protein deposits in the myocardium. The effects of viewing perspectives on interobserver agreement in the interpretation of 99mTc-PYP SPECT images for the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis remain unclear.Methods: A retrospective analysis of 32 consecutive patients who underwent 99mTc-PYP imaging for the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis at Nagasaki University Hospital between October 2017 and February 2020 was performed. Four evaluators independently reviewed coronal, sagittal, and transaxial images and then all images together and made a categorical diagnosis based on predefined criteria. Interobserver agreement was analyzed using Cohen's Kappa analysis.Results: Kappa coefficient values in the four-grade grading system (grades 0–3) ranged between 0.31 and 0.95, while those in the binary grading system (positive/negative) ranged between 0.88 and 1. The sagittal view showed the highest value in the four-grade grading system (0.95) and the lowest in the binary grading system (0.88). The transaxial view was more likely to show a consistently high kappa value in both the four-grade and binary grading systems. The use of the multiplanar view reduced the number of subjects classified as grade 1.Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that the transaxial view provides the most consistent interpretation of 99mTc-PYP SPECT images for the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis. The use of the multiplanar view may also reduce equivocal interpretations, which are graded as grade 1. Further studies with larger sample sizes and a quantitative analysis are needed to confirm the present results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对心脏淀粉样变性<sup> 99m>/sup>Tc-PYP SPECT成像解释的观察者间一致性评估
背景:锝-99m焦磷酸单光子发射计算机断层扫描(99mTc-PYP SPECT)成像被广泛用于诊断心脏淀粉样变性,这是一种以心肌中淀粉样蛋白沉积为特征的疾病。在99mTc-PYP SPECT图像诊断心脏淀粉样变性的解释中,观察视角对观察者间一致性的影响尚不清楚。方法:回顾性分析2017年10月至2020年2月在长崎大学医院连续接受99mTc-PYP成像诊断心脏淀粉样变性的32例患者。四名评估人员独立审查冠状、矢状和横轴图像,然后将所有图像放在一起,并根据预定义的标准进行分类诊断。使用Cohen的Kappa分析来分析观察者间的一致性。结果:4级(0 ~ 3级)评分体系的Kappa系数值在0.31 ~ 0.95之间,2级(正/负)评分体系的Kappa系数值在0.88 ~ 1之间。矢状面4级评分最高(0.95),2级评分最低(0.88)。在四级和二元分级系统中,跨轴视图更有可能显示一致的高kappa值。多平面视图的使用减少了被分类为1级的受试者数量。结论:我们的研究表明,99mTc-PYP SPECT图像在诊断心脏淀粉样变性方面提供了最一致的解释。多平面视图的使用也可以减少模棱两可的解释,这被评为1级。需要更大样本量的进一步研究和定量分析来证实目前的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Myocardial Strain Derived from 13N-ammonia Positron Emission Tomography: Detection of Ischemia-Related Wall Motion Abnormality. Phantom-Based Standardization Method for 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine Heart-to-Mediastinum Ratio Validated by D-SPECT Versus Anger Camera. Modified Algorithm Using Total Count for Calculating Myocardial Washout Rate in Single-Photon Emission Computerized Tomography. The Application of Conditional Probability to Harmonize Nuclear Cardiology Test Results. Validation of a Five-Year Prognostic Model Using 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine Scintigraphy in Patients with Heart Failure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1