Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on bystander CPR in patient with OHCA: a registry-based before and after study in Daegu, Korea

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Signa Vitae Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.22514/sv.2023.116
{"title":"Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on bystander CPR in patient with OHCA: a registry-based before and after study in Daegu, Korea","authors":"","doi":"10.22514/sv.2023.116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR) is a significant factor in the chain of survival; however, various potential barriers are observed. We aimed to identify the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on BCPR. This retrospective observational study used Daegu out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) registry data of patients aged over 18 years with cardiac etiology in Daegu, Korea from 18 February 2019 to 17 February 2021. We divided BCPR into self-led (SBCPR) and dispatcher-assisted BCPR (DACPR). To determine changes in the effect of BCPR on OHCA outcomes from the COVID-19 pandemic, we performed multivariable logistic regression analyses by BCPR type. Furthermore, we performed the Wald test to identify differences in logistic regression analysis results between the two periods. A total of 1680 OHCAs were included (before-pandemic, 804; during pandemic, 876). The BCPR rate was not different between the two periods (DACPR, 43.9% vs. 42.0%; SBCPR, 18.7% vs. 18.4; p = 0.643). SBCPR showed effectiveness for OHCA outcomes before the pandemic (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 2.59; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.09–6.18 for survival to hospital discharge; aOR, 2.58; 95% CI, 1.03–6.46 for favorable neurological outcomes); however, it disappeared after the pandemic (aOR, 1.88; 95% CI, 0.88–4.00 for survival to hospital discharge; aOR, 1.67; 95% CI, 0.69–4.05 for favorable neurological outcomes). However, no statistical difference was observed in the Wald test (survival to hospital discharge, p = 0.586; favorable neurologic outcomes, p = 0.504). A decreasing trend in the effect of SBCPR on OHCA outcomes was observed during the COVID-19 pandemic; however, no statistically significant difference was observed compared with that before the pandemic.","PeriodicalId":49522,"journal":{"name":"Signa Vitae","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Signa Vitae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22514/sv.2023.116","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR) is a significant factor in the chain of survival; however, various potential barriers are observed. We aimed to identify the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on BCPR. This retrospective observational study used Daegu out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) registry data of patients aged over 18 years with cardiac etiology in Daegu, Korea from 18 February 2019 to 17 February 2021. We divided BCPR into self-led (SBCPR) and dispatcher-assisted BCPR (DACPR). To determine changes in the effect of BCPR on OHCA outcomes from the COVID-19 pandemic, we performed multivariable logistic regression analyses by BCPR type. Furthermore, we performed the Wald test to identify differences in logistic regression analysis results between the two periods. A total of 1680 OHCAs were included (before-pandemic, 804; during pandemic, 876). The BCPR rate was not different between the two periods (DACPR, 43.9% vs. 42.0%; SBCPR, 18.7% vs. 18.4; p = 0.643). SBCPR showed effectiveness for OHCA outcomes before the pandemic (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 2.59; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.09–6.18 for survival to hospital discharge; aOR, 2.58; 95% CI, 1.03–6.46 for favorable neurological outcomes); however, it disappeared after the pandemic (aOR, 1.88; 95% CI, 0.88–4.00 for survival to hospital discharge; aOR, 1.67; 95% CI, 0.69–4.05 for favorable neurological outcomes). However, no statistical difference was observed in the Wald test (survival to hospital discharge, p = 0.586; favorable neurologic outcomes, p = 0.504). A decreasing trend in the effect of SBCPR on OHCA outcomes was observed during the COVID-19 pandemic; however, no statistically significant difference was observed compared with that before the pandemic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19大流行对OHCA患者旁观者心肺复苏的影响:韩国大邱基于登记的前后研究
旁观者心肺复苏(BCPR)是生存链中的一个重要因素,然而,观察到各种潜在的障碍。我们旨在确定2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行对BCPR的影响。这项回顾性观察性研究使用了2019年2月18日至2021年2月17日韩国大邱18岁以上心脏病因患者的院外心脏骤停(OHCA)登记数据。我们将BCPR分为自主导型(SBCPR)和调度员辅助型(DACPR)。为了确定BCPR对COVID-19大流行后OHCA结局影响的变化,我们按BCPR类型进行了多变量logistic回归分析。此外,我们进行了Wald检验,以确定两个时期之间逻辑回归分析结果的差异。共纳入了1680个ohca(大流行前804个;大流行期间876个)。两期BCPR率无差异(DACPR 43.9% vs 42.0%; SBCPR 18.7% vs 18.4; p = 0.643)。SBCPR在大流行前显示了OHCA结局的有效性(调整优势比(aOR), 2.59; 95%可信区间(CI),生存至出院1.09-6.18;aOR, 2.58;神经系统良好结局95% CI, 1.03-6.46);然而,在大流行后消失(aOR, 1.88;生存至出院95% CI, 0.88-4.00; aOR, 1.67;神经系统良好结局95% CI, 0.69-4.05)。然而,Wald检验无统计学差异(生存至出院,p = 0.586;良好的神经系统预后,p = 0.504)。在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,SBCPR对OHCA结果的影响呈下降趋势,但与大流行前相比无统计学差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Signa Vitae
Signa Vitae 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Signa Vitae is a completely open-access,peer-reviewed journal dedicate to deliver the leading edge research in anaesthesia, intensive care and emergency medicine to publics. The journal’s intention is to be practice-oriented, so we focus on the clinical practice and fundamental understanding of adult, pediatric and neonatal intensive care, as well as anesthesia and emergency medicine. Although Signa Vitae is primarily a clinical journal, we welcome submissions of basic science papers if the authors can demonstrate their clinical relevance. The Signa Vitae journal encourages scientists and academicians all around the world to share their original writings in the form of original research, review, mini-review, systematic review, short communication, case report, letter to the editor, commentary, rapid report, news and views, as well as meeting report. Full texts of all published articles, can be downloaded for free from our web site.
期刊最新文献
Emergency treatment for iatrogenic lumbar arterial injury occurred during posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a case report The effects of perioperative low-dose magnesium sulfate infusion on postoperative pain in lumbar surgery Effect of volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation modes on cerebral oximetry in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial Risk factors for ground-level fall injuries during active activity in older patients An early presentation of neurogenic pulmonary edema in acute subarachnoid hemorrhage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1