Early Gains in Motor Learning Measured Through Two Coordination Tests: A Retrospective Analysis of Gender Differences

Q3 Health Professions Sport Mont Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.26773/smj.231005
Ivan Jurak, Ozren Rađenović, Vjeran Švaić, Ivan Vrbik, Dalibor Kiseljak
{"title":"Early Gains in Motor Learning Measured Through Two Coordination Tests: A Retrospective Analysis of Gender Differences","authors":"Ivan Jurak, Ozren Rađenović, Vjeran Švaić, Ivan Vrbik, Dalibor Kiseljak","doi":"10.26773/smj.231005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Motor skills can be improved through rapid on-the-job training or slower multi-session learning. The objective of this study was to determine the rapid learning differences between male and female university students during the execution of two motor coordination tests. Available data from 716 female and 331 male college students were retrospectively analyzed. The female participants had a mean age (±SD) of 19.6 (±1.55) years, while the male participants recorded a mean age of 19.8 (±1.87) years. Data were collected using two motor coordination tests, each performed in triplicate. The statistical method used in this analysis was mixed-model ANOVA. The interaction effect of gender and number of attempts was statistically significant for both motor coordination tests (F=12.446; p<0.01; η2p=0.13 &amp; F=11.169; p<0.01; η2p=0.01). Post-hoc testing showed that males performed better at the tasks in all three runs, and both genders improved their performance in subsequent trials. However, females showed a larger relative improvement from trial to trial than did males. The two coordination tests yield similar results. The observed differences in improvements in the coordination tests may be attributed to different motor learning strategies and cognitive processing between the sexes.","PeriodicalId":22150,"journal":{"name":"Sport Mont","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sport Mont","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26773/smj.231005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Motor skills can be improved through rapid on-the-job training or slower multi-session learning. The objective of this study was to determine the rapid learning differences between male and female university students during the execution of two motor coordination tests. Available data from 716 female and 331 male college students were retrospectively analyzed. The female participants had a mean age (±SD) of 19.6 (±1.55) years, while the male participants recorded a mean age of 19.8 (±1.87) years. Data were collected using two motor coordination tests, each performed in triplicate. The statistical method used in this analysis was mixed-model ANOVA. The interaction effect of gender and number of attempts was statistically significant for both motor coordination tests (F=12.446; p<0.01; η2p=0.13 & F=11.169; p<0.01; η2p=0.01). Post-hoc testing showed that males performed better at the tasks in all three runs, and both genders improved their performance in subsequent trials. However, females showed a larger relative improvement from trial to trial than did males. The two coordination tests yield similar results. The observed differences in improvements in the coordination tests may be attributed to different motor learning strategies and cognitive processing between the sexes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过两个协调测试测量运动学习的早期收益:性别差异的回顾性分析
运动技能可以通过快速的在职培训或缓慢的多阶段学习来提高。本研究的目的是确定男女大学生在执行两项运动协调测试时的快速学习差异。对716名女大学生和331名男大学生的现有资料进行回顾性分析。女性参与者的平均年龄(±SD)为19.6(±1.55)岁,男性参与者的平均年龄为19.8(±1.87)岁。通过两次运动协调测试收集数据,每次进行三次。本分析采用的统计方法为混合模型方差分析。在两项运动协调测试中,性别和尝试次数的交互效应均有统计学意义(F=12.446;术中,0.01;η2 p = 0.13,F = 11.169;术中,0.01;η2 p = 0.01)。事后测试显示,男性在所有三次测试中都表现得更好,在随后的测试中,男性和女性的表现都有所提高。然而,每次试验中,女性都比男性表现出更大的相对改善。这两个协调测试得出了相似的结果。在协调测试中观察到的差异可能归因于不同的运动学习策略和性别之间的认知加工。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sport Mont
Sport Mont Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: SM covers all aspects of sports science and medicine; all clinical aspects of exercise, health, and sport; exercise physiology and biophysical investigation of sports performance; sport biomechanics; sports nutrition; rehabilitation, physiotherapy; sports psychology; sport pedagogy, sport history, sport philosophy, sport sociology, sport management; and all aspects of scientific support of the sports coaches from the natural, social and humanistic side.
期刊最新文献
Barriers to Physical Activity (PA) in the Working Population: A Review Body Composition Variation among U-19 Futsal National Team Players from Bosnia and Herzegovina According to Playing Position Differences in the Quality of Life Relative to the Level of Cardiorespiratory Capacity of Primary School Students Differences in Trunk Muscle Strength (Lateral Flexor Group) between Male and Female Athletes Digital-Based E-module in Tennis Learning for Undergraduate Students in Sports Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1