Effect of microrelief features of tillage methods under different rainfall intensities on runoff and soil erosion in slopes

IF 7.3 1区 农林科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES International Soil and Water Conservation Research Pub Date : 2023-10-13 DOI:10.1016/j.iswcr.2023.10.001
Xinkai Zhao , Xiaoyu Song , Lanjun Li , Danyang Wang , Pengfei Meng , Huaiyou Li
{"title":"Effect of microrelief features of tillage methods under different rainfall intensities on runoff and soil erosion in slopes","authors":"Xinkai Zhao ,&nbsp;Xiaoyu Song ,&nbsp;Lanjun Li ,&nbsp;Danyang Wang ,&nbsp;Pengfei Meng ,&nbsp;Huaiyou Li","doi":"10.1016/j.iswcr.2023.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Tillage methods play a crucial role in controlling rainwater partitioning and soil erosion. This study utilized rainfall simulation experiments to investigate the impact of four tillage methods (manual digging (MD), manual hoeing (MH), traditional ploughing (TP), and ridged ploughing (RP)) on runoff and soil erosion at the plot scale. The smooth slope (SS) was used as a benchmark. Rainfall intensities of 30, 60, 90, and 120 mm h<sup>−1</sup> were considered. The study revealed that tillage altered rainwater distribution into depression storage, infiltration, and runoff. Tillage reduces runoff and increases infiltration. The four tillage methods (30–73%) increased the proportion of rainwater converted to infiltration to varying degrees compared to the SS (22–53%). Microrelief features influenced the role of tillage methods in soil erosion. Surface roughness and depression storage accounted for 79% of the variation in sediment yield. The four tillage methods reduced runoff by 2.1–64.7% and sediment yield by 2.5–77.2%. Moreover, increased rainfall intensity weakens the ability of tillage to control soil erosion. When rainfall intensity increased to 120 mm h<sup>−1</sup>, there was no significant difference in runoff yield among RP, TP, MH, and SS. Therefore, assessing the effectiveness of tillage in reducing soil erosion should consider changes in rainfall intensity. Additionally, the cover management (C) factor of the RUSLE was used to assess the effects of different tillage methods on soil loss. Overall, the C factor values for tilled slopes are in the order MH &gt; TP &gt; RP &gt; MD with a range of 0.23–0.97. As the surface roughness increases, the C factor tends to decrease, and the two are exponential functions (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.86). These studies contribute to our understanding of how different tillage methods impact runoff and soil erosion in sloped farmland and provide guidance for selecting appropriate local manual tillage methods.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48622,"journal":{"name":"International Soil and Water Conservation Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095633923000916/pdfft?md5=5ca203a316d53e0a85aaa8473e604c80&pid=1-s2.0-S2095633923000916-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Soil and Water Conservation Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095633923000916","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tillage methods play a crucial role in controlling rainwater partitioning and soil erosion. This study utilized rainfall simulation experiments to investigate the impact of four tillage methods (manual digging (MD), manual hoeing (MH), traditional ploughing (TP), and ridged ploughing (RP)) on runoff and soil erosion at the plot scale. The smooth slope (SS) was used as a benchmark. Rainfall intensities of 30, 60, 90, and 120 mm h−1 were considered. The study revealed that tillage altered rainwater distribution into depression storage, infiltration, and runoff. Tillage reduces runoff and increases infiltration. The four tillage methods (30–73%) increased the proportion of rainwater converted to infiltration to varying degrees compared to the SS (22–53%). Microrelief features influenced the role of tillage methods in soil erosion. Surface roughness and depression storage accounted for 79% of the variation in sediment yield. The four tillage methods reduced runoff by 2.1–64.7% and sediment yield by 2.5–77.2%. Moreover, increased rainfall intensity weakens the ability of tillage to control soil erosion. When rainfall intensity increased to 120 mm h−1, there was no significant difference in runoff yield among RP, TP, MH, and SS. Therefore, assessing the effectiveness of tillage in reducing soil erosion should consider changes in rainfall intensity. Additionally, the cover management (C) factor of the RUSLE was used to assess the effects of different tillage methods on soil loss. Overall, the C factor values for tilled slopes are in the order MH > TP > RP > MD with a range of 0.23–0.97. As the surface roughness increases, the C factor tends to decrease, and the two are exponential functions (R2 = 0.86). These studies contribute to our understanding of how different tillage methods impact runoff and soil erosion in sloped farmland and provide guidance for selecting appropriate local manual tillage methods.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同降雨强度下耕作方法的微缓解特征对坡地径流和土壤侵蚀的影响
耕作方法在控制雨水分配和土壤侵蚀方面起着至关重要的作用。本研究利用降雨模拟实验研究了四种耕作方法(人工挖掘法(MD)、人工锄草法(MH)、传统犁耕法(TP)和脊状犁耕法(RP))对地块尺度径流和土壤侵蚀的影响。以平滑坡(SS)为基准。降雨强度分别为 30、60、90 和 120 毫米/小时。研究表明,耕作改变了雨水在洼地的储存、渗透和径流分布。耕作减少了径流,增加了渗透。与 SS(22-53%)相比,四种耕作方法(30-73%)在不同程度上增加了雨水转化为渗透的比例。微凹陷特征影响了耕作方法在土壤侵蚀中的作用。地表粗糙度和洼地贮存占泥沙产量变化的 79%。四种耕作方法使径流量减少了 2.1-64.7%,泥沙产量减少了 2.5-77.2%。此外,降雨强度的增加会削弱耕作控制土壤侵蚀的能力。当降雨强度增加到 120 mm h-1 时,RP、TP、MH 和 SS 的径流产量没有显著差异。因此,在评估耕作对减少土壤侵蚀的效果时,应考虑降雨强度的变化。此外,RUSLE 的覆盖管理(C)因子也用于评估不同耕作方法对土壤流失的影响。总体而言,耕作斜坡的 C 因子值依次为 MH > TP > RP > MD,范围为 0.23-0.97。随着表面粗糙度的增加,C 系数呈下降趋势,两者呈指数函数关系(R2 = 0.86)。这些研究有助于我们了解不同耕作方法如何影响坡耕地的径流和土壤侵蚀,并为当地选择适当的人工耕作方法提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Soil and Water Conservation Research
International Soil and Water Conservation Research Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
171
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: The International Soil and Water Conservation Research (ISWCR), the official journal of World Association of Soil and Water Conservation (WASWAC) http://www.waswac.org, is a multidisciplinary journal of soil and water conservation research, practice, policy, and perspectives. It aims to disseminate new knowledge and promote the practice of soil and water conservation. The scope of International Soil and Water Conservation Research includes research, strategies, and technologies for prediction, prevention, and protection of soil and water resources. It deals with identification, characterization, and modeling; dynamic monitoring and evaluation; assessment and management of conservation practice and creation and implementation of quality standards. Examples of appropriate topical areas include (but are not limited to): • Conservation models, tools, and technologies • Conservation agricultural • Soil health resources, indicators, assessment, and management • Land degradation • Sustainable development • Soil erosion and its control • Soil erosion processes • Water resources assessment and management • Watershed management • Soil erosion models • Literature review on topics related soil and water conservation research
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Wind and rainfall erosion energy in large sediment generating and coarse sediment class areas of the middle Yellow River Can hydraulic-energy-indices be effectively used to describe the saturated hydraulic conductivity? National Variability in Soil Organic Carbon Stock Predictions: Impact of Bulk Density Pedotransfer Functions Three-dimensional spatiotemporal variation of soil organic carbon and its influencing factors at the basin scale
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1