The use of carbon dioxide and intense pulsed light laser for the treatment of hypertrophic burn scars: A case series

Sophia Dahm, Geoffrey Lee, Heather Cleland, Hana Menezes, Sally Ng
{"title":"The use of carbon dioxide and intense pulsed light laser for the treatment of hypertrophic burn scars: A case series","authors":"Sophia Dahm, Geoffrey Lee, Heather Cleland, Hana Menezes, Sally Ng","doi":"10.1177/20595131231202103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Hypertrophic scarring is a common and debilitating consequence of burn scars. While there is limited evidence for current treatment options, laser therapy has been shown to be effective, low risk and minimally invasive. This study assesses the use of carbon dioxide lasers and intense pulsed light devices in the treatment of hypertrophic burn scars. Methods In this case series, patients were recruited from a hypertrophic burn scar waitlist and completed a Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale prior to and six weeks after laser therapy. The Nordlys (intense pulsed light) and CO 2 RE (carbon dioxide) systems from Candela Medical were used, with a range of settings used depending on the assessment of the burn scar. The differences between scores were calculated for the total Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale score, pain, itch, colour, stiffness, thickness, irregularity and the overall opinion of the scar. Statistical analysis was completed using a paired, two-tailed student T test. Results A total of 31 patients were recruited for this trial with a range of scar locations, surface areas and mechanism of burn injury. The calculated difference in mean showed a significant reduction for the overall Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale score (1.93, p < 0.0001), pain (1.39, p = 0.0002), itch (1.84, p = 0.0002), colour (1.97, p < 0.0001), stiffness (2.47, p < 0.0001), thickness (2.1, p < 0.0001), irregularity (1.89, p < 0.0001) and overall opinion (1.58, p = 0.0003). Conclusion Current management options for hypertrophic scarring have limited evidence. Laser therapy presents a minimally invasive procedure that can be completed under topical anaesthetic and has shown to be effective following a single treatment of combined carbon dioxide laser and intense pulsed light device therapy. Lay Summary Many people will suffer a burn injury throughout their life and up to almost 3 out of 4 people with burn injuries will suffer from hypertrophic scars (a thickened, red and itchy scar). These scars cause distress both due to their appearance and their reduction of function, particularly over a joint or muscle. Laser therapy, in which different wave lengths of light (pulsed light) or gas (carbon dioxide) target the scar, has been found to be effective and have minimal side effects in the management of hypertrophic scars. While individual lasers have been assessed and found to be effective and low risk, the combined use of multiple lasers on the same scar has not been extensively studied. We studied the effectiveness of both light and gas laser therapies on hypertrophic scars. Patients with hypertrophic scars completed a questionnaire that focused on their perspective of their scar (pain, itch, stiffness, thickness, irregularity, overall opinion) prior to the treatment. The patients then underwent laser therapy (with local anaesthetic gel) with either pulsed light and/or carbon dioxide (gas) laser. The type of laser used was decided by the clinician performing the therapy depending on scar location and thickness. Patients then re-completed the subjective survey six weeks following the laser therapy, and the results compared. We learnt that laser therapy (both light, gas and a combination of both) are effective (and low risk) in reducing the subjective burden of the scar for the patient.","PeriodicalId":21495,"journal":{"name":"Scars, burns & healing","volume":"140 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scars, burns & healing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20595131231202103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Hypertrophic scarring is a common and debilitating consequence of burn scars. While there is limited evidence for current treatment options, laser therapy has been shown to be effective, low risk and minimally invasive. This study assesses the use of carbon dioxide lasers and intense pulsed light devices in the treatment of hypertrophic burn scars. Methods In this case series, patients were recruited from a hypertrophic burn scar waitlist and completed a Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale prior to and six weeks after laser therapy. The Nordlys (intense pulsed light) and CO 2 RE (carbon dioxide) systems from Candela Medical were used, with a range of settings used depending on the assessment of the burn scar. The differences between scores were calculated for the total Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale score, pain, itch, colour, stiffness, thickness, irregularity and the overall opinion of the scar. Statistical analysis was completed using a paired, two-tailed student T test. Results A total of 31 patients were recruited for this trial with a range of scar locations, surface areas and mechanism of burn injury. The calculated difference in mean showed a significant reduction for the overall Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale score (1.93, p < 0.0001), pain (1.39, p = 0.0002), itch (1.84, p = 0.0002), colour (1.97, p < 0.0001), stiffness (2.47, p < 0.0001), thickness (2.1, p < 0.0001), irregularity (1.89, p < 0.0001) and overall opinion (1.58, p = 0.0003). Conclusion Current management options for hypertrophic scarring have limited evidence. Laser therapy presents a minimally invasive procedure that can be completed under topical anaesthetic and has shown to be effective following a single treatment of combined carbon dioxide laser and intense pulsed light device therapy. Lay Summary Many people will suffer a burn injury throughout their life and up to almost 3 out of 4 people with burn injuries will suffer from hypertrophic scars (a thickened, red and itchy scar). These scars cause distress both due to their appearance and their reduction of function, particularly over a joint or muscle. Laser therapy, in which different wave lengths of light (pulsed light) or gas (carbon dioxide) target the scar, has been found to be effective and have minimal side effects in the management of hypertrophic scars. While individual lasers have been assessed and found to be effective and low risk, the combined use of multiple lasers on the same scar has not been extensively studied. We studied the effectiveness of both light and gas laser therapies on hypertrophic scars. Patients with hypertrophic scars completed a questionnaire that focused on their perspective of their scar (pain, itch, stiffness, thickness, irregularity, overall opinion) prior to the treatment. The patients then underwent laser therapy (with local anaesthetic gel) with either pulsed light and/or carbon dioxide (gas) laser. The type of laser used was decided by the clinician performing the therapy depending on scar location and thickness. Patients then re-completed the subjective survey six weeks following the laser therapy, and the results compared. We learnt that laser therapy (both light, gas and a combination of both) are effective (and low risk) in reducing the subjective burden of the scar for the patient.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用二氧化碳和强脉冲光激光治疗增生性烧伤疤痕:一个案例系列
增生性瘢痕是烧伤疤痕的常见和衰弱的后果。虽然目前的治疗方案证据有限,但激光治疗已被证明是有效、低风险和微创的。本研究评估了二氧化碳激光和强脉冲光设备在治疗肥厚性烧伤疤痕中的应用。方法在本病例系列中,从增生性烧伤瘢痕等候名单中招募患者,并在激光治疗前和治疗后6周完成患者和观察者疤痕评估量表。使用来自Candela Medical的nordys(强脉冲光)和CO 2 RE(二氧化碳)系统,根据烧伤疤痕的评估使用一系列设置。计算患者和观察者疤痕评估量表总分、疼痛、瘙痒、颜色、僵硬、厚度、不规则性和疤痕的总体看法的评分差异。统计分析采用配对双尾学生T检验完成。结果共招募了31例患者,他们的疤痕位置、表面面积和烧伤机制各不相同。计算出的平均值差异显示,患者和观察者疤痕评估量表总分显著降低(1.93,p <0.0001),疼痛(1.39,p = 0.0002),瘙痒(1.84,p = 0.0002),颜色(1.97,p <0.0001),刚度(2.47,p <0.0001),厚度(2.1,p <0.0001),不规则性(1.89,p <0.0001)和总体意见(1.58,p = 0.0003)。结论目前治疗增生性瘢痕的方法证据有限。激光治疗是一种微创手术,可以在局部麻醉下完成,并且在二氧化碳激光和强脉冲光装置治疗的单一治疗后显示有效。许多人一生中都会遭受烧伤,几乎每4个烧伤患者中就有3个患有增生性疤痕(增厚、发红、发痒的疤痕)。这些疤痕会引起痛苦,因为它们的外观和功能的减少,特别是在关节或肌肉上。激光治疗,其中不同波长的光(脉冲光)或气体(二氧化碳)的目标疤痕,已被发现是有效的,并有最小的副作用,在管理增生性疤痕。虽然对单个激光器进行了评估并发现其有效且风险低,但在同一疤痕上联合使用多个激光器尚未进行广泛研究。我们研究了光和气体激光治疗增生性疤痕的有效性。增生性疤痕患者在治疗前完成了一份调查问卷,主要是关于他们对疤痕的看法(疼痛、瘙痒、僵硬、厚度、不规则性、总体看法)。然后,患者接受脉冲光和/或二氧化碳(气体)激光治疗(局部麻醉凝胶)。使用的激光类型由临床医生根据疤痕的位置和厚度来决定。然后患者在激光治疗后6周重新完成主观调查,并比较结果。我们了解到激光治疗(包括光、气和两者的结合)在减轻患者对疤痕的主观负担方面是有效的(而且风险低)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of oral Calendula officinalis on second-degree burn wound healing. To bleed or not to bleed? Case series and discussion of haemorrhage risk with enzymatic debridement in burn injuries. An evaluation of clinical psychology input into burns multidisciplinary follow-up clinics. The efficacy of combined ultrasound and electric field stimulation therapy in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. Protocol for clinical diagnosis and empiric treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis in severely burned patients: observations and literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1