Differential Impact of Blood Pressure Control Targets on Epicardial Coronary Flow After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

IF 1.4 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Structural Heart Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.shj.2023.100230
Brennan J. Vogl BS , Alejandra Chavez-Ponce MD , Adam Wentworth MS , Eric Erie AAS , Pradeep Yadav MD , Vinod H. Thourani MD , Lakshmi Prasad Dasi PhD , Brian Lindman MD, MSc , Mohamad Alkhouli MD , Hoda Hatoum PhD
{"title":"Differential Impact of Blood Pressure Control Targets on Epicardial Coronary Flow After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement","authors":"Brennan J. Vogl BS ,&nbsp;Alejandra Chavez-Ponce MD ,&nbsp;Adam Wentworth MS ,&nbsp;Eric Erie AAS ,&nbsp;Pradeep Yadav MD ,&nbsp;Vinod H. Thourani MD ,&nbsp;Lakshmi Prasad Dasi PhD ,&nbsp;Brian Lindman MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Mohamad Alkhouli MD ,&nbsp;Hoda Hatoum PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.shj.2023.100230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The cause for the association between increased cardiovascular mortality rates and lower blood pressure (BP) after aortic valve replacement (AVR) is unclear. This study aims to assess how the epicardial coronary flow (ECF) after AVR varies as BP levels are changed in the presence of a right coronary lesion.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The hemodynamics of a 3D printed aortic root model with a SAPIEN 3 26 deployed were evaluated in an <em>in vitro</em> left heart simulator under a range of varying systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). ECF and the flow ratio index were calculated. Flow index value &lt;0.8 was considered a threshold for ischemia.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>As SBP decreased, the average ECF decreased below the physiological coronary minimum at 120 mmHg. As DBP decreased, the average ECF was still maintained above the physiological minimum. The flow ratio index was &gt;0.9 for SBP ≥130 mmHg. However, at an SBP of 120 mmHg, the flow ratio was 0.63 (<em>p</em> ≤ 0.0055). With decreasing DBP, no BP condition yielded a flow ratio index that was less than 0.91.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Reducing BP to the current recommended levels assigned for the general population after AVR in the presence of coronary artery disease may require reconsideration of levels and treatment priority. Additional studies are needed to fully understand the changes in ECF dynamics after AVR in the presence and absence of coronary artery disease.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36053,"journal":{"name":"Structural Heart","volume":"8 1","pages":"Article 100230"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2474870623001240/pdfft?md5=f196d452263fee2a8a6454519e119567&pid=1-s2.0-S2474870623001240-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structural Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2474870623001240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The cause for the association between increased cardiovascular mortality rates and lower blood pressure (BP) after aortic valve replacement (AVR) is unclear. This study aims to assess how the epicardial coronary flow (ECF) after AVR varies as BP levels are changed in the presence of a right coronary lesion.

Methods

The hemodynamics of a 3D printed aortic root model with a SAPIEN 3 26 deployed were evaluated in an in vitro left heart simulator under a range of varying systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). ECF and the flow ratio index were calculated. Flow index value <0.8 was considered a threshold for ischemia.

Results

As SBP decreased, the average ECF decreased below the physiological coronary minimum at 120 mmHg. As DBP decreased, the average ECF was still maintained above the physiological minimum. The flow ratio index was >0.9 for SBP ≥130 mmHg. However, at an SBP of 120 mmHg, the flow ratio was 0.63 (p ≤ 0.0055). With decreasing DBP, no BP condition yielded a flow ratio index that was less than 0.91.

Conclusions

Reducing BP to the current recommended levels assigned for the general population after AVR in the presence of coronary artery disease may require reconsideration of levels and treatment priority. Additional studies are needed to fully understand the changes in ECF dynamics after AVR in the presence and absence of coronary artery disease.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经导管主动脉瓣置换术后血压控制目标对心外膜冠脉流量的不同影响
背景主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)后心血管死亡率增加与血压(BP)降低之间的关联原因尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估在右冠状动脉病变的情况下,主动脉瓣置换术后心外膜冠状动脉血流(ECF)是如何随着血压水平的变化而变化的。方法在体外左心模拟器中,在收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)变化的范围内,评估了3D打印主动脉根部模型的血流动力学。计算了 ECF 和流量比率指数。结果 随着 SBP 的降低,平均 ECF 降至低于 120 mmHg 时的生理冠状动脉最小值。随着 DBP 的降低,平均 ECF 仍保持在生理最小值以上。当 SBP ≥130 mmHg 时,血流比率指数为 0.9。然而,当 SBP 为 120 mmHg 时,流量比率为 0.63(p ≤ 0.0055)。结论在有冠状动脉疾病的情况下,将血压降低到 AVR 后为普通人群指定的当前推荐水平可能需要重新考虑血压水平和治疗的优先次序。需要进行更多的研究,以充分了解存在和不存在冠状动脉疾病的情况下进行房室反流术后心 ECF 动态的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Structural Heart
Structural Heart Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
期刊最新文献
Moderate Aortic Stenosis—Advanced Imaging, Risk Assessment, and Treatment Strategies The Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement-Conduction Study: The Value of the His-Ventricular Interval in Risk Stratification for Post-TAVR Atrioventricular-Block Large Field-of-View Intravascular Ultrasound for Mitral and Tricuspid Valve-in-Valve Guidance: A Pilot Study Quantitative Aortography Analysis of JenaValve’s Trilogy Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation System in Patients With Aortic Regurgitation or Stenosis A Novel Risk Score Facilitates Femoral Artery Access in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Passage-Puncture Score
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1