The quality of older adults’ involvement in clinical communication with general practitioners: evidence from rural towns in Australia

Mohammad Hamiduzzaman , Noore Siddiquee , Harry James Gaffney , Muhammad Aziz Rahman , Jennene Greenhill
{"title":"The quality of older adults’ involvement in clinical communication with general practitioners: evidence from rural towns in Australia","authors":"Mohammad Hamiduzzaman ,&nbsp;Noore Siddiquee ,&nbsp;Harry James Gaffney ,&nbsp;Muhammad Aziz Rahman ,&nbsp;Jennene Greenhill","doi":"10.1016/j.glohj.2023.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>A study was conducted about the putative links of older rural Australians’ health knowledge and preparation with their quality of involvement in patient-general practitioner (GP) communication during health intake visits.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>It was a cross-sectional study between January 2021 and April 2022. The 32-item quality of involvement in communication scale was designed and incorporated into the SurveyGizmo software. This online survey was administered by sending an email request to the Renmark Rotary Club, which actively promoted this study across five rural towns in South Australia. 121 participants completed the surveys. Mean-sum scores were calculated based on the questionnaire responses to evaluate outcomes, specifically initiation of information, active participation, and emotional expression. We employed different methods including <em>t</em>-tests, ANOVA, and leaner regressions to analyse data.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The demographic profile of participants characterised by a female predominance (58.7%, 71/121), a majority falling within the 65‒&lt; 70 age bracket (47.1%, 57/121), and a high level of educational attainment (58.7% had completed high school or higher, 71/121). Additionally, 35% of the participants predominantly spoke a language other than English at home. Regarding the initiation of information with GPs, the mean sum-score was (20.5 ± 3.7), indicating a marginally above-average level of engagement. Contrarily, the active participation was suboptimal, as suggested by a mean sum score of (35.9 ± 6.3). Furthermore, the emotional expression was relatively low, with a mean score of (13.9 ± 1.8). Substantial variations were discerned in the quality of patient-GP communication, contingent upon factors such as educational background, language spoken at home, health literacy, and preparatory measures for clinical visits. Participants who predominantly spoke a language other than English at home demonstrated significantly lower levels of information initiation with their GPs (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Higher educational attainment was positively correlated with increased active participation (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Enhanced health literacy and thorough visit preparation were significantly associated with increased levels of active participation (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Meaningful engagement through recognition, empowerment, and support (health literacy programs) for older rural adults is suggested for improving their quality of involvement in communication with GPs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73164,"journal":{"name":"Global health journal (Amsterdam, Netherlands)","volume":"7 4","pages":"Pages 186-193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2414644723000891/pdfft?md5=2fcfabf373e13824e3acd99471724c99&pid=1-s2.0-S2414644723000891-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global health journal (Amsterdam, Netherlands)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2414644723000891","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

A study was conducted about the putative links of older rural Australians’ health knowledge and preparation with their quality of involvement in patient-general practitioner (GP) communication during health intake visits.

Methods

It was a cross-sectional study between January 2021 and April 2022. The 32-item quality of involvement in communication scale was designed and incorporated into the SurveyGizmo software. This online survey was administered by sending an email request to the Renmark Rotary Club, which actively promoted this study across five rural towns in South Australia. 121 participants completed the surveys. Mean-sum scores were calculated based on the questionnaire responses to evaluate outcomes, specifically initiation of information, active participation, and emotional expression. We employed different methods including t-tests, ANOVA, and leaner regressions to analyse data.

Results

The demographic profile of participants characterised by a female predominance (58.7%, 71/121), a majority falling within the 65‒< 70 age bracket (47.1%, 57/121), and a high level of educational attainment (58.7% had completed high school or higher, 71/121). Additionally, 35% of the participants predominantly spoke a language other than English at home. Regarding the initiation of information with GPs, the mean sum-score was (20.5 ± 3.7), indicating a marginally above-average level of engagement. Contrarily, the active participation was suboptimal, as suggested by a mean sum score of (35.9 ± 6.3). Furthermore, the emotional expression was relatively low, with a mean score of (13.9 ± 1.8). Substantial variations were discerned in the quality of patient-GP communication, contingent upon factors such as educational background, language spoken at home, health literacy, and preparatory measures for clinical visits. Participants who predominantly spoke a language other than English at home demonstrated significantly lower levels of information initiation with their GPs (P < 0.001). Higher educational attainment was positively correlated with increased active participation (P < 0.001). Enhanced health literacy and thorough visit preparation were significantly associated with increased levels of active participation (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Meaningful engagement through recognition, empowerment, and support (health literacy programs) for older rural adults is suggested for improving their quality of involvement in communication with GPs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年人参与全科医生临床沟通的质量:来自澳大利亚农村城镇的证据
目的 研究了澳大利亚农村老年人的健康知识和准备情况与他们在就诊期间参与患者与全科医生(GP)沟通的质量之间的潜在联系。方法 这是一项横断面研究,研究时间为 2021 年 1 月至 2022 年 4 月。设计了32个项目的沟通参与质量量表,并将其纳入SurveyGizmo软件。这项在线调查是通过向伦马克扶轮社(Renmark Rotary Club)发送电子邮件的方式进行的,该扶轮社在南澳大利亚的五个乡镇积极推广这项研究。121 名参与者完成了调查。我们根据调查问卷的回答计算了平均和分数,以评估结果,特别是信息启动、积极参与和情感表达。我们采用了不同的方法来分析数据,包括 t 检验、方差分析和精益回归。结果参与者的人口统计学特征为女性居多(58.7%,71/121),大多数人属于 65-< 70 岁年龄段(47.1%,57/121),教育程度较高(58.7% 完成了高中或高中以上学业,71/121)。此外,35%的参与者在家中主要讲英语以外的语言。关于向全科医生主动提供信息,平均总分为(20.5 ± 3.7),表明参与程度略高于平均水平。相反,平均总分为(35.9 ± 6.3),表明积极参与程度不理想。此外,情感表达相对较低,平均得分为(13.9 ± 1.8)。患者与医生之间的沟通质量存在很大差异,这取决于教育背景、家庭常用语言、健康素养以及临床就诊前的准备措施等因素。在家主要讲英语以外语言的参与者与全科医生进行信息交流的水平明显较低(P < 0.001)。受教育程度越高,积极参与程度越高(P < 0.001)。结论建议通过认可、授权和支持(健康素养计划)让农村老年人有意义地参与,以提高他们与全科医生沟通的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global health journal (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
Global health journal (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Building a transdisciplinary science of One Health with a global vision Mobile health interventions for improving maternal and child health outcomes in South Africa: a systematic review Plain language in the healthcare of Japan: a systematic review of “plain Japanese” Demographic and socioeconomic determinants of urinary arsenic concentration for elementary school children in Bangladesh Shared decision making in rural general practices: a qualitative exploration of older rural South Australians’ perceived involvement in clinical consultations with doctors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1