Early Clinical Experience with a New Hydrophobic Acrylic Single-Piece Monofocal Intraocular Lens

IF 1.8 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Clinical ophthalmology Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.2147/opth.s433530
Steven Schallhorn, David Teenan, Jan Venter, Julie Schallhorn, Stephen Hannan
{"title":"Early Clinical Experience with a New Hydrophobic Acrylic Single-Piece Monofocal Intraocular Lens","authors":"Steven Schallhorn, David Teenan, Jan Venter, Julie Schallhorn, Stephen Hannan","doi":"10.2147/opth.s433530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To evaluate early clinical outcomes and adverse events (AEs) in cataract patients following implantation of a monofocal hydrophobic acrylic IOL with a new optimized non-constant aberration-correcting design (CT LUCIA 621P). Methods: This retrospective study included patients with visually significant cataracts who underwent implantation of the CT LUCIA 621P IOL. Refraction, corrected (CDVA) and uncorrected (UDVA) visual acuity of the last available visit were used in the analysis. Intraoperative and postoperative AEs of the cohort were reviewed. Results: A total of 191 eyes of 133 patients with the mean age of 70.2± 11.2 years were included in this study. The mean follow-up time of the last available visit was 1.7± 1.3 months. The mean postoperative monocular UDVA was 0.09± 0.16 logMAR (≈20/25), and 74.9% (143/191) eyes achieved ≥ 20/25 UDVA. The percentage of eyes with manifest spherical equivalent (MSE) within ± 0.50D and ± 1.00D of emmetropia was 84.8% (162/191) and 98.4% (188/191), respectively. Linear regression of attempted vs achieved MSE showed a tight relationship, with the coefficient of determination close to 1 (R 2 =0.99), indicating a very predictable refractive correction. The reported AEs were those typically expected after cataract surgery. There were no AEs related to intraoperative manipulation with the IOL/injector or to postoperative stability of the IOL in the capsular bag. No eye lost ≥ 2 lines of CDVA. Conclusion: The implantation of CT LUCIA 621P resulted in good refractive predictability and visual outcomes. No IOL-related adverse events were reported. Keywords: monofocal IOL, non-constant aberration-correcting optic design, cataract surgery","PeriodicalId":10442,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology","volume":"28 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/opth.s433530","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate early clinical outcomes and adverse events (AEs) in cataract patients following implantation of a monofocal hydrophobic acrylic IOL with a new optimized non-constant aberration-correcting design (CT LUCIA 621P). Methods: This retrospective study included patients with visually significant cataracts who underwent implantation of the CT LUCIA 621P IOL. Refraction, corrected (CDVA) and uncorrected (UDVA) visual acuity of the last available visit were used in the analysis. Intraoperative and postoperative AEs of the cohort were reviewed. Results: A total of 191 eyes of 133 patients with the mean age of 70.2± 11.2 years were included in this study. The mean follow-up time of the last available visit was 1.7± 1.3 months. The mean postoperative monocular UDVA was 0.09± 0.16 logMAR (≈20/25), and 74.9% (143/191) eyes achieved ≥ 20/25 UDVA. The percentage of eyes with manifest spherical equivalent (MSE) within ± 0.50D and ± 1.00D of emmetropia was 84.8% (162/191) and 98.4% (188/191), respectively. Linear regression of attempted vs achieved MSE showed a tight relationship, with the coefficient of determination close to 1 (R 2 =0.99), indicating a very predictable refractive correction. The reported AEs were those typically expected after cataract surgery. There were no AEs related to intraoperative manipulation with the IOL/injector or to postoperative stability of the IOL in the capsular bag. No eye lost ≥ 2 lines of CDVA. Conclusion: The implantation of CT LUCIA 621P resulted in good refractive predictability and visual outcomes. No IOL-related adverse events were reported. Keywords: monofocal IOL, non-constant aberration-correcting optic design, cataract surgery
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新型疏水丙烯酸单片单焦点人工晶状体的早期临床应用
目的:评价新型优化非恒定像差校正设计(CT LUCIA 621P)单焦疏水性丙烯酸人工晶体植入术后白内障患者的早期临床结果和不良事件(ae)。方法:采用CT LUCIA 621P人工晶状体植入术对视力显著的白内障患者进行回顾性研究。最后一次就诊的屈光、矫正视力(CDVA)和未矫正视力(UDVA)用于分析。回顾了该队列的术中和术后ae。结果:共纳入133例患者191只眼,平均年龄70.2±11.2岁。最后一次可访问的平均随访时间为1.7±1.3个月。术后平均单眼UDVA为0.09±0.16 logMAR (≈20/25), 74.9%(143/191)眼UDVA≥20/25。在远视±0.50D和±1.00D范围内的明显球面等效度(MSE)分别为84.8%(162/191)和98.4%(188/191)。尝试与实现的MSE线性回归显示出紧密的关系,决定系数接近1 (r2 =0.99),表明非常可预测的屈光矫正。报告的ae是白内障手术后的典型ae。术中操作人工晶状体/注射器或术后囊袋内人工晶状体稳定性无不良反应。无眼丢失≥2行CDVA。结论:LUCIA 621P CT植入术具有良好的屈光预见性和视力效果。无人工晶状体相关不良事件报道。关键词:单焦点人工晶体,非恒定像差校正光学设计,白内障手术
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical ophthalmology
Clinical ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
499
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Optimal Duration of Monocular Occlusion to Eliminate Fusion Effect in Intermittent Exotropia Time Savings Using a Digital Workflow versus a Conventional for Intraocular Lens Implantation in a Corporate Chain Hospital Setting The Prevalence and Severity of Acquired Blepharoptosis in US Eye Care Clinic Patients and Their Receptivity to Treatment Fungal Keratitis: Diagnosis, Management, and Recent Advances Evaluation of Foveal Avascular Zone After Strabismic and Anisometropic Amblyopia Therapy in Saudi Children Using Optic Coherence Tomography Angiography: A Cohort Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1