Abortion

IF 0.5 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Contemporary Psychoanalysis Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI:10.1080/00107530.2023.2258062
Rosemary H. Balsam
{"title":"Abortion","authors":"Rosemary H. Balsam","doi":"10.1080/00107530.2023.2258062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractA deprivation of women’s reproductive rights has occurred by the right-wing turn in recent United States’ politics. Looking at the details of Roe v. Wade, (1973), and Dobbs (2022), the author notes the limited legal, but predominantly emotional, thinking in the Supreme Court’s opinions that led to the overturn. The contemporary legal coup is seen here as yet another age-old attempt to control the female body’s reproductive powers and capacities. Using an example, the author notes the unconscious male fear of female’s bodily self-governance that inhibits any empathy for “the other.” She also reflects on a widespread archaic unconscious horror – and thus hostility – toward the female qua female, akin to Kristeva’s description of “the abject,” which the author likens to the raw products of an aborted conception. Such graphic unconscious reactions seem to skew the Law, which here fails to uphold the logic of equal status among adult humans.Keywords: Roe v. Wade (1973)Dobbs (2022)misogynymale fear of femalesfemale autonomyarchaic female body horrors“the abject” Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Pender, a psychoanalyst, was the 2021 president of the American Psychiatric Association, and Chair of the NGO Committee on the Status of Women in the United Nations.Additional informationNotes on contributorsRosemary H. BalsamRosemary H. Balsam F.R.C.Psych (Lond), M.R. C. P. (Edin), (originally from Belfast, N. Ireland), is an Associate Clinical Professor of Psychiatry in the Yale Medical School; staff psychiatrist in the Yale Department of Student Mental Health and Counseling, and a Training and Supervising Analyst at the Western New England Institute for Psychoanalysis, New Haven, Conn. Her special interests are female gender developments; young adulthoods; the body in psychic life; the work of Hans Loewald. She is on the editorial boards of PQ and American Imago. Among her honors in 2018, she received the Sigourney Award,—the first female awardee in the United States). Her most recent book is: Women’s Bodies in Psychoanalysis (2012, Routledge) and she is co-editing 2 books on Hans Loewald’s work, at present.","PeriodicalId":46058,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Psychoanalysis","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Psychoanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00107530.2023.2258062","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractA deprivation of women’s reproductive rights has occurred by the right-wing turn in recent United States’ politics. Looking at the details of Roe v. Wade, (1973), and Dobbs (2022), the author notes the limited legal, but predominantly emotional, thinking in the Supreme Court’s opinions that led to the overturn. The contemporary legal coup is seen here as yet another age-old attempt to control the female body’s reproductive powers and capacities. Using an example, the author notes the unconscious male fear of female’s bodily self-governance that inhibits any empathy for “the other.” She also reflects on a widespread archaic unconscious horror – and thus hostility – toward the female qua female, akin to Kristeva’s description of “the abject,” which the author likens to the raw products of an aborted conception. Such graphic unconscious reactions seem to skew the Law, which here fails to uphold the logic of equal status among adult humans.Keywords: Roe v. Wade (1973)Dobbs (2022)misogynymale fear of femalesfemale autonomyarchaic female body horrors“the abject” Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Pender, a psychoanalyst, was the 2021 president of the American Psychiatric Association, and Chair of the NGO Committee on the Status of Women in the United Nations.Additional informationNotes on contributorsRosemary H. BalsamRosemary H. Balsam F.R.C.Psych (Lond), M.R. C. P. (Edin), (originally from Belfast, N. Ireland), is an Associate Clinical Professor of Psychiatry in the Yale Medical School; staff psychiatrist in the Yale Department of Student Mental Health and Counseling, and a Training and Supervising Analyst at the Western New England Institute for Psychoanalysis, New Haven, Conn. Her special interests are female gender developments; young adulthoods; the body in psychic life; the work of Hans Loewald. She is on the editorial boards of PQ and American Imago. Among her honors in 2018, she received the Sigourney Award,—the first female awardee in the United States). Her most recent book is: Women’s Bodies in Psychoanalysis (2012, Routledge) and she is co-editing 2 books on Hans Loewald’s work, at present.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
堕胎
摘要近年来,美国政治右倾化导致女性生育权被剥夺。回顾罗伊诉韦德案(1973)和多布斯案(2022)的细节,作者注意到最高法院的意见中有限的法律思维,但主要是情感思维,导致了推翻。在这里,当代的法律政变被视为另一种古老的控制女性身体生殖能力和能力的尝试。作者举了一个例子,指出男性对女性身体自我管理的无意识恐惧抑制了对“他者”的同情。她还反思了一种普遍存在的、古老的、无意识的对女性的恐惧——以及因此而产生的敌意——对女性本身的恐惧,类似于克里斯蒂娃对“下等人”的描述,作者将其比作流产的原始产物。这种形象的无意识反应似乎扭曲了法律,在这里,法律未能维护成年人平等地位的逻辑。关键词:Roe v. Wade (1973)Dobbs(2022)厌女症男性对女性的恐惧女性自主过时的女性身体恐惧“卑鄙的”披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1彭德是一名精神分析学家,曾担任美国精神病学协会2021年主席,以及联合国妇女地位非政府组织委员会主席。作者简介:rosemary H. Balsam F.R.C.Psych (Lond), m.r.c.p. (Edin),(来自北爱尔兰贝尔法斯特),耶鲁大学医学院精神病学临床副教授;耶鲁大学学生心理健康与咨询系的精神科医生,康涅狄格州纽黑文西部新英格兰精神分析研究所的培训和监督分析师。她的特别兴趣是女性性别发展;年轻的成年;精神生活中的身体;汉斯·洛瓦尔德的作品她是《PQ》和《美国形象》的编委会成员。2018年,她获得了西格尼奖(Sigourney Award),这是美国第一位获得该奖项的女性。她最近的一本书是《精神分析中的女性身体》(2012年,劳特利奇出版),目前她正在与人合编两本关于汉斯·洛瓦尔德作品的书。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
What Happens When We Talk to Each Other: Psychoanalytic Perspectives on Race and Other Difficult Conversations A Fresh Beginning to an Old Conversation: Thoughts on Leon Hoffman’s “We Don’t Trust YOU: Reflections on Anti-Racism in Psychoanalysis” Looking for Love in All the Wrong Places: Hatred as a Conflict Between Dependency and the Pseudo-Autonomous Self Surviving Hating and Being Hated On “Othering”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1