Factors Associated With Emergency Department Visits Among Patients Receiving Publicly-funded Homecare Services: A Retrospective Chart Review From Southern Taiwan Regional Hospital

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES International Journal of Health Policy and Management Pub Date : 2023-09-26 DOI:10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7377
Wen-Yi Chiu, Ta-Chuan Yeh, Chia-Chi Yang
{"title":"Factors Associated With Emergency Department Visits Among Patients Receiving Publicly-funded Homecare Services: A Retrospective Chart Review From Southern Taiwan Regional Hospital","authors":"Wen-Yi Chiu, Ta-Chuan Yeh, Chia-Chi Yang","doi":"10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The public health strategy of increasing access to comprehensive home or community-based healthcare services and emergency home visits is intent on reducing the overcrowding of emergency departments. However, scientific evidence regarding the association between home-based healthcare services and emergency department uses is surprisingly insufficient and controversial so far. The present retrospective study identified the risk factors for emergency department visits among patients receiving publicly-funded homecare services. Methods: The personal demographic and medical information, caregiver characteristics, and behaviours related to homecare services and emergency department visits from the medical records and structured questionnaires of 108 patients who were recipients of integrated homecare services in a regional hospital in southern Taiwan between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2020, were collected. After screening the potential predictor variables using the preliminary univariate analyses, the multivariate logistic regression with best subset selection approach was conducted to identify best combination of determinants to predict unplanned emergency department utilizations. Results: Best subset selection regression analysis showed Charlson Comorbidity Index (odds ratio (OR)=1.33, 95% CI=1.05 to 1.70), male caregiver (OR=0.18, 95% CI=0.05 to 0.66), duration of introducing homecare services (OR=0.97, 95% CI=0.95 to 1.00), working experience of dedicated nurses (OR=0.89, 95% CI=0.79 to 0.99) and number of emergency department utilizations within previous past year before enrollment (OR=1.54, 95% CI=1.14 to 2.10) as significant determinants for unplanned emergency department visits. Conclusions: The present evidence may help government agencies propose supportive policies to improve access to integrated homecare resources and promote appropriate care recommendations to reduce unplanned or nonurgent emergency department visits among patients receiving homecare services.","PeriodicalId":14135,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Policy and Management","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Policy and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7377","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The public health strategy of increasing access to comprehensive home or community-based healthcare services and emergency home visits is intent on reducing the overcrowding of emergency departments. However, scientific evidence regarding the association between home-based healthcare services and emergency department uses is surprisingly insufficient and controversial so far. The present retrospective study identified the risk factors for emergency department visits among patients receiving publicly-funded homecare services. Methods: The personal demographic and medical information, caregiver characteristics, and behaviours related to homecare services and emergency department visits from the medical records and structured questionnaires of 108 patients who were recipients of integrated homecare services in a regional hospital in southern Taiwan between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2020, were collected. After screening the potential predictor variables using the preliminary univariate analyses, the multivariate logistic regression with best subset selection approach was conducted to identify best combination of determinants to predict unplanned emergency department utilizations. Results: Best subset selection regression analysis showed Charlson Comorbidity Index (odds ratio (OR)=1.33, 95% CI=1.05 to 1.70), male caregiver (OR=0.18, 95% CI=0.05 to 0.66), duration of introducing homecare services (OR=0.97, 95% CI=0.95 to 1.00), working experience of dedicated nurses (OR=0.89, 95% CI=0.79 to 0.99) and number of emergency department utilizations within previous past year before enrollment (OR=1.54, 95% CI=1.14 to 2.10) as significant determinants for unplanned emergency department visits. Conclusions: The present evidence may help government agencies propose supportive policies to improve access to integrated homecare resources and promote appropriate care recommendations to reduce unplanned or nonurgent emergency department visits among patients receiving homecare services.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接受公费家庭照护服务患者急诊科就诊之相关因素:台湾南部地区医院回顾性图表回顾
背景:增加获得综合家庭或社区保健服务和紧急家访的公共卫生战略旨在减少急诊科的过度拥挤。然而,到目前为止,关于家庭保健服务与急诊科使用之间关系的科学证据令人惊讶地不足和有争议。本回顾性研究确定了接受公费家庭护理服务的患者急诊科就诊的危险因素。方法:收集2020年1月1日至2020年12月31日在台湾南部某地区医院接受综合家庭护理服务的108例患者的病历和结构化问卷,收集其个人人口统计学和医疗信息、护理人员特征、与家庭护理服务相关的行为和急诊就诊情况。在使用初步单变量分析筛选潜在的预测变量后,采用最佳子集选择方法进行多变量逻辑回归,以确定决定因素的最佳组合,以预测计划外急诊室的利用。结果:最佳亚群选择回归分析显示,Charlson共病指数(优势比(OR)=1.33, 95% CI=1.05 ~ 1.70)、男性护理员(OR=0.18, 95% CI=0.05 ~ 0.66)、引入居家护理服务的时间(OR=0.97, 95% CI=0.95 ~ 1.00)、专职护士的工作经验(OR=0.89, 95% CI=0.79 ~ 0.99)、入组前一年内急诊科就诊次数(OR=1.54,95% CI=1.14至2.10)是计划外急诊就诊的重要决定因素。结论:目前的证据可能有助于政府机构提出支持性政策,以改善获得综合家庭护理资源的机会,并促进适当的护理建议,以减少接受家庭护理服务的患者的计划外或非紧急急诊科就诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
International Journal of Health Policy and Management Health Professions-Health Information Management
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
142
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Health Policy and Management (IJHPM) is a monthly open access, peer-reviewed journal which serves as an international and interdisciplinary setting for the dissemination of health policy and management research. It brings together individual specialties from different fields, notably health management/policy/economics, epidemiology, social/public policy, and philosophy into a dynamic academic mix.
期刊最新文献
Why Are African Researchers Left Behind in Global Scientific Publications? - A Viewpoint. Grappling With the Inclusion of Patients and the Public in Consensus Building: A Commentary on Inclusion, Safety, and Accessibility; Comment on "Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study". Phase IV Drug Trials With a Canadian Site: A Comparison of Industry and Non-Industry-Funded Trials. The Rhetoric of Decolonizing Global Health Fails to Address the Reality of Settler Colonialism. Gaza as a Case in Point. Building a Systems Map: Applying Systems Thinking to Unhealthy Commodity Industry Influence on Public Health Policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1