Decomposing Difficulty of Reading Literacy Test Items

IF 0.7 Q4 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Voprosy Obrazovaniya-Educational Studies Moscow Pub Date : 2023-11-06 DOI:10.17323/vo-2023-16925
Алина Иванова, Инна Антипкина
{"title":"Decomposing Difficulty of Reading Literacy Test Items","authors":"Алина Иванова, Инна Антипкина","doi":"10.17323/vo-2023-16925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current study investigates the question of test difficulty decomposition depending on the characteristics of items (such as: format, belonging to the type of text to which the item belongs) and the reader's actions required to answer it (search for information in the text, simple conclusions, complex conclusions, critical interpretation of the text). The sample of the study consisted of fourth grade elementary school students in Krasnoyarsk, who completed the computerized test of reading literacy \"Progress\" in the spring of 2022. Research method: psychometric modeling using the LLTM+e model. Research hypothesis: the decomposition of item difficulties will help to prove that the reading actions required to complete the tasks will form a hierarchy of difficulties similar to traditional taxonomies (B. Bloom), that is, reading skills aimed at analyzing, synthesizing, interpreting information will give tasks greater difficulty than simple conclusions, and those, in turn, will make tasks more difficult than the reader's actions to find information in the text. The results show that the assignment of items to the group of reader's actions is a significant factor. The size of the effects does not allow us to speak of a strict hierarchy, but when other attributes are controlled, the tasks for information retrieval in an explicit form are easier for students than the tasks for complex conclusions and for critical understanding of the text.","PeriodicalId":54119,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy Obrazovaniya-Educational Studies Moscow","volume":"44 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voprosy Obrazovaniya-Educational Studies Moscow","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17323/vo-2023-16925","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current study investigates the question of test difficulty decomposition depending on the characteristics of items (such as: format, belonging to the type of text to which the item belongs) and the reader's actions required to answer it (search for information in the text, simple conclusions, complex conclusions, critical interpretation of the text). The sample of the study consisted of fourth grade elementary school students in Krasnoyarsk, who completed the computerized test of reading literacy "Progress" in the spring of 2022. Research method: psychometric modeling using the LLTM+e model. Research hypothesis: the decomposition of item difficulties will help to prove that the reading actions required to complete the tasks will form a hierarchy of difficulties similar to traditional taxonomies (B. Bloom), that is, reading skills aimed at analyzing, synthesizing, interpreting information will give tasks greater difficulty than simple conclusions, and those, in turn, will make tasks more difficult than the reader's actions to find information in the text. The results show that the assignment of items to the group of reader's actions is a significant factor. The size of the effects does not allow us to speak of a strict hierarchy, but when other attributes are controlled, the tasks for information retrieval in an explicit form are easier for students than the tasks for complex conclusions and for critical understanding of the text.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阅读素养测试项目难度分解
目前的研究根据题目的特征(如:格式,属于题目所属的文本类型)和读者回答问题所需的行为(在文本中搜索信息,简单结论,复杂结论,对文本的批判性解释)来调查测试难度分解问题。该研究的样本包括克拉斯诺亚尔斯克的四年级小学生,他们在2022年春天完成了阅读能力“进步”的计算机测试。研究方法:采用LLTM+e模型进行心理测量建模。研究假设:项目难度的分解将有助于证明完成任务所需的阅读动作将形成与传统分类法类似的难度层次(B. Bloom),即以分析、综合、解释信息为目的的阅读技能将使任务比简单的结论更困难,而这些又将使任务比读者在文本中查找信息的动作更困难。结果表明,项目分配对读者行为组是一个重要的影响因素。影响的大小不允许我们谈论严格的层次结构,但是当其他属性受到控制时,以明确形式检索信息的任务对学生来说比复杂结论和批判性理解文本的任务更容易。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Voprosy Obrazovaniya-Educational Studies Moscow
Voprosy Obrazovaniya-Educational Studies Moscow EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
42.90%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Power of Probability in Psychometrics. Review of the book “Bayesian Psychometric Modeling“ The Role of Context in Scenario-Based Tasks for Measuring Universal Skills: The Use of Generalizability Theory Experience of Using Bifactor Models to Reduce the Effects of Social Desirability on the Normative Questionnaire of Universal Competencies Psychometric Research: Modern Methods and New Opportunities for Education Psychometrics and Cognitive Research: Contradictions and Possibility for Cooperation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1