Predicting Surgical Mortality After Congenital Heart Surgeries Using Risk Adjustment in Congenital Heart Surgery-1 (RACHS-1) Risk Scoring System: A Retrospective Analysis in A Single Tertiary Center

IF 0.1 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Nepalese Heart Journal Pub Date : 2023-11-05 DOI:10.3126/nhj.v20i2.59449
Smriti Mahaju Bajracharya, Dikshya Joshi, Sidhartha Pradhan
{"title":"Predicting Surgical Mortality After Congenital Heart Surgeries Using Risk Adjustment in Congenital Heart Surgery-1 (RACHS-1) Risk Scoring System: A Retrospective Analysis in A Single Tertiary Center","authors":"Smriti Mahaju Bajracharya, Dikshya Joshi, Sidhartha Pradhan","doi":"10.3126/nhj.v20i2.59449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The main objective of our study was to analyze the in-hospital mortality in children who underwent surgery for congenital heart defects in a single tertiary cardiac center in Nepal using RACHS-1 risk score during 6 year period. Methods: After approval from Institutional Review Board, retrospective data analysis were performed from June 2013 to June 2019 at Shahid Gangalal National Heart Centre. Patients younger than 14 years, who underwent cardiac surgery for congenital heart defects, were enrolled. Data from patient records regarding the age, gender, weight, diagnosis, procedures performed, cardio‑pulmonary bypass (CPB) time and aortic cross‑clamp (AoX) were obtained. The operations were classifed according to the six RACHS-1 categories and patients were allotted to RACHS-1 categories retrospectively by matching the procedure of each patient with a risk category. Results: Two thousand four hundred and seventeen patients underwent surgeries for congenital heart diseases who were classifed according to the RACHS‑1 score. Among the patients, 56.1 % were male and 20.1 % were younger than one year of age. The mortality was 1.5%,13.3%, 21.7% and 73.4% for category 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively. The overall ability of the RACHS‑1 classifcation to predict in‑hospital mortality Area under the ROC curve was 0.736 with 95% confdence interval (CI) of 0.709-0.763. Conclusion: The RACHS‑1 classification is applicable to our pediatric populations which was a useful and easily applicable tool, requiring only very few data for mortality risk in our hospital although there are other factors that have an impact on the mortality.","PeriodicalId":52010,"journal":{"name":"Nepalese Heart Journal","volume":"116 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nepalese Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/nhj.v20i2.59449","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The main objective of our study was to analyze the in-hospital mortality in children who underwent surgery for congenital heart defects in a single tertiary cardiac center in Nepal using RACHS-1 risk score during 6 year period. Methods: After approval from Institutional Review Board, retrospective data analysis were performed from June 2013 to June 2019 at Shahid Gangalal National Heart Centre. Patients younger than 14 years, who underwent cardiac surgery for congenital heart defects, were enrolled. Data from patient records regarding the age, gender, weight, diagnosis, procedures performed, cardio‑pulmonary bypass (CPB) time and aortic cross‑clamp (AoX) were obtained. The operations were classifed according to the six RACHS-1 categories and patients were allotted to RACHS-1 categories retrospectively by matching the procedure of each patient with a risk category. Results: Two thousand four hundred and seventeen patients underwent surgeries for congenital heart diseases who were classifed according to the RACHS‑1 score. Among the patients, 56.1 % were male and 20.1 % were younger than one year of age. The mortality was 1.5%,13.3%, 21.7% and 73.4% for category 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively. The overall ability of the RACHS‑1 classifcation to predict in‑hospital mortality Area under the ROC curve was 0.736 with 95% confdence interval (CI) of 0.709-0.763. Conclusion: The RACHS‑1 classification is applicable to our pediatric populations which was a useful and easily applicable tool, requiring only very few data for mortality risk in our hospital although there are other factors that have an impact on the mortality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用先心病手术风险调整-1 (RACHS-1)风险评分系统预测先心病手术后手术死亡率:单一三级中心的回顾性分析
目的:我们研究的主要目的是使用RACHS-1风险评分分析尼泊尔单一三级心脏中心6年期间接受先天性心脏缺陷手术的儿童住院死亡率。方法:经机构审查委员会批准,对2013年6月至2019年6月在Shahid Gangalal国家心脏中心进行回顾性数据分析。年龄小于14岁,因先天性心脏缺陷而接受心脏手术的患者被纳入研究。从患者记录中获得有关年龄、性别、体重、诊断、手术、心肺旁路(CPB)时间和主动脉交叉钳(AoX)的数据。根据6个RACHS-1分类对手术进行分类,通过将每个患者的手术与风险分类相匹配,回顾性地将患者分配到RACHS-1类别。结果:2417例接受先天性心脏病手术的患者根据RACHS - 1评分进行分类。其中男性占56.1%,年龄小于1岁的占20.1%。第1、2、3、4类病死率分别为1.5%、13.3%、21.7%和73.4%。RACHS - 1分类在ROC曲线下预测院内死亡面积的总体能力为0.736,95%可信区间(CI)为0.709 ~ 0.763。结论:RACHS - 1分类适用于我们的儿科人群,是一种有用且易于应用的工具,尽管存在其他影响死亡率的因素,但仅需要很少的数据即可了解我院的死亡率风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nepalese Heart Journal
Nepalese Heart Journal CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
自引率
50.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Patient blood management for cardiovascular surgery: Clinical practice consensus statement Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy in the setting of Urosepsis A Randomized Comparison of Two Doses of Tranexamic Acid in High-Risk Open-Heart Surgery Cardiovascular Disease Risk Profiling among First-Degree Relatives of Premature Coronary Artery Disease Patients Effect of an Educational Intervention for Nursing Personnel on Emergency Inventory and Drugs Checklist of Resuscitation Trolley in a Tertiary Cardiac Center, Kathmandu.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1