Development and validation of a case definition to estimate the prevalence and incidence of cirrhosis in pan-Canadian primary care databases

Nabiha Faisal, Leanne Kosowan, Hasan Zafari, Farhana Zulkernine, Lisa Lix, Alyson Mahar, Harminder Singh, Eberhard Renner, Alexander Singer
{"title":"Development and validation of a case definition to estimate the prevalence and incidence of cirrhosis in pan-Canadian primary care databases","authors":"Nabiha Faisal, Leanne Kosowan, Hasan Zafari, Farhana Zulkernine, Lisa Lix, Alyson Mahar, Harminder Singh, Eberhard Renner, Alexander Singer","doi":"10.3138/canlivj-2023-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: To develop and validate case definitions to identify patients with cirrhosis and alcohol-related cirrhosis using primary care electronic medical records (EMRs) and to estimate cirrhosis prevalence and incidence in pan-Canadian primary care database, between 2011 and 2019. Methods: A total of 689,301 adult patients were included with ≥1 visit to a primary care provider within the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Study Network between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2018. Subsample of 17,440 patients was used to validate the case definitions. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values were calculated with their 95% confidence intervals (CI) and then determined the population-level prevalence and incidence trends with the most accurate case definition. Results: The most accurate case definition included: ≥1 health condition, billing, or encounter diagnosis for International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes 571.2, 571.5, 789.59, or 571. Sensitivity (84.6; 95% CI: 83.1–86.%), specificity (99.3; 95% CI: 99.1–99.4%), positive predictive values (94.8; 95% CI: 93.9–95.7%), and negative predictive values (97.5; 95% CI: 97.3–97.7%). Application of this definition to the overall population resulted in a crude prevalence estimate of (0.46%, 95% CI: 0.45%–0.48%). Annual incidence of patients with a clinical diagnosis of cirrhosis nearly doubled between 2011 (0.05%, 95% CI: 0.04%–0.06%) and 2019 to (0.09%, 95% CI: 0.08%–0.09%). Conclusions: The EMR-based case definition accurately captured patients diagnosed with cirrhosis in primary care. Future work to characterize patients with cirrhosis and their primary care experiences can support improvements in identification and management in primary care settings.","PeriodicalId":9527,"journal":{"name":"Canadian liver journal","volume":"162 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian liver journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/canlivj-2023-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To develop and validate case definitions to identify patients with cirrhosis and alcohol-related cirrhosis using primary care electronic medical records (EMRs) and to estimate cirrhosis prevalence and incidence in pan-Canadian primary care database, between 2011 and 2019. Methods: A total of 689,301 adult patients were included with ≥1 visit to a primary care provider within the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Study Network between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2018. Subsample of 17,440 patients was used to validate the case definitions. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values were calculated with their 95% confidence intervals (CI) and then determined the population-level prevalence and incidence trends with the most accurate case definition. Results: The most accurate case definition included: ≥1 health condition, billing, or encounter diagnosis for International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes 571.2, 571.5, 789.59, or 571. Sensitivity (84.6; 95% CI: 83.1–86.%), specificity (99.3; 95% CI: 99.1–99.4%), positive predictive values (94.8; 95% CI: 93.9–95.7%), and negative predictive values (97.5; 95% CI: 97.3–97.7%). Application of this definition to the overall population resulted in a crude prevalence estimate of (0.46%, 95% CI: 0.45%–0.48%). Annual incidence of patients with a clinical diagnosis of cirrhosis nearly doubled between 2011 (0.05%, 95% CI: 0.04%–0.06%) and 2019 to (0.09%, 95% CI: 0.08%–0.09%). Conclusions: The EMR-based case definition accurately captured patients diagnosed with cirrhosis in primary care. Future work to characterize patients with cirrhosis and their primary care experiences can support improvements in identification and management in primary care settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在泛加拿大初级保健数据库中评估肝硬化患病率和发病率的病例定义的发展和验证
目的:制定和验证病例定义,利用初级保健电子医疗记录(emr)识别肝硬化和酒精相关肝硬化患者,并估计2011年至2019年期间泛加拿大初级保健数据库中的肝硬化患病率和发病率。方法:在2017年1月1日至2018年12月31日期间,共有689,301名成年患者在加拿大初级保健哨点研究网络中进行了≥1次的初级保健提供者就诊。采用17440例患者的子样本来验证病例定义。计算灵敏度、特异性和预测值及其95%置信区间(CI),然后确定最准确病例定义的人群水平患病率和发病率趋势。结果:最准确的病例定义包括:≥1种健康状况、账单或遭遇诊断(《国际疾病分类》第九次修订代码571.2、571.5、789.59或571)。灵敏度(84.6;95% CI: 83.1 - 86%),特异性(99.3;95% CI: 99.1-99.4%),阳性预测值(94.8;95% CI: 93.9-95.7%),阴性预测值(97.5;95% ci: 97.3-97.7%)。将这一定义应用于总体人群,得出了粗略的患病率估计值(0.46%,95% CI: 0.45%-0.48%)。临床诊断为肝硬化的患者年发病率在2011年(0.05%,95% CI: 0.04%-0.06%)和2019年(0.09%,95% CI: 0.08%-0.09%)之间几乎翻了一番。结论:基于emr的病例定义准确地捕获了初级保健中诊断为肝硬化的患者。未来对肝硬化患者特征及其初级保健经历的研究,将有助于改善初级保健机构的识别和管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Population-level cascade of care for hepatitis C in Newfoundland and Labrador Isolated hepatic sarcoidosis: A case series Breaking boundaries: Unraveling metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease in children of India and Canada Exploring autoantibodies as predictors of severe fibrosis or cirrhosis in metabolic dysfunction associated steatotic liver disease Impact of statins in the liver: A bane or a boon?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1