Incentives in matching markets: Counting and comparing manipulating agents

IF 1.2 3区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Theoretical Economics Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3982/te5105
Somouaoga Bonkoungou, Alexander Nesterov
{"title":"Incentives in matching markets: Counting and comparing manipulating agents","authors":"Somouaoga Bonkoungou, Alexander Nesterov","doi":"10.3982/te5105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Manipulability is a threat to the successful design of centralized matching markets. However, in many applications some manipulation is inevitable and the designer wants to compare manipulable mechanisms to select the best among them. We count the number of agents with an incentive to manipulate and rank mechanisms by their level of manipulability. This ranking sheds a new light on practical design decisions such as the design of the entry‐level medical labor market in the United States, and school admissions systems in New York, Chicago, Denver, and many cities in Ghana and the United Kingdom.","PeriodicalId":46923,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical Economics","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoretical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3982/te5105","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Manipulability is a threat to the successful design of centralized matching markets. However, in many applications some manipulation is inevitable and the designer wants to compare manipulable mechanisms to select the best among them. We count the number of agents with an incentive to manipulate and rank mechanisms by their level of manipulability. This ranking sheds a new light on practical design decisions such as the design of the entry‐level medical labor market in the United States, and school admissions systems in New York, Chicago, Denver, and many cities in Ghana and the United Kingdom.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
匹配市场中的激励:计算和比较操纵主体
可操纵性对集中式匹配市场的成功设计构成威胁。然而,在许多应用中,一些操作是不可避免的,设计师希望比较可操作的机构,从中选择最好的。我们计算具有操纵动机的代理的数量,并根据其可操纵程度对机制进行排序。该排名为实际设计决策提供了新的视角,例如美国入门级医疗劳动力市场的设计,以及纽约、芝加哥、丹佛、加纳和英国许多城市的学校招生系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
35
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊介绍: Theoretical Economics publishes leading research in economic theory. It is published by the Econometric Society three times a year, in January, May, and September. All content is freely available. It is included in the Social Sciences Citation Index
期刊最新文献
NOT BY MAX WEBER ALONE: HISTORICAL TYPES OF STATE BUREAUCRACY (THE ADVANTAGES AND SHORTCOMINGS) STUDENT YOUTH’ SOCIAL ACTIVITY MASS PRACTICES On rank dominance of tie‐breaking rules UNDERSTANDING ECONOMIC SECURITY IN RUSSIA: OFFICIAL DOCTRINE AND ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES Loss aversion in sequential auctions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1